An in Vivo Comparison of the Debridement Efficiency of Needle Irrigation Versus Ultrasonic Irrigation
NCT ID: NCT00806273
Last Updated: 2019-06-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2009-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. The purpose of this study is to compare the Vista ultrasonic bypass system and conventional needle irrigation to effectively clean the bottom third of the root canal during root canal therapy.
2. Participants will be recruited from the general patient pool of the OHSU School of Dentistry. Patients will have to qualify for the study by meeting the following criteria: age between 18 and 75 years old, ASA status I or II, are currently planning treatment for the extraction of teeth, and the patient understands and signs the consent form. The principal investigator will conduct an interview with the patient and the student-provider, and obtain informed consent from the patient.
3. The teeth to be extracted will be numbed with local anesthetic. The teeth will be isolated with a rubber dam and disinfected. The pulp chamber will be accessed using normal dental equipment and the root canal will be cleaned and shaped using either the ultrasonic irrigation technique or needle irrigation. This is the first step of standard root canal therapy. The tooth will then be extracted and the principal investigator will retain extracted teeth to perform further examination to see how thoroughly the root canals were cleaned. The teeth will be discarded after study.
4. Not applicable
5. The investigational device (Vista ultrasonic bypass system) consists of a 30 gauge slot needle which attaches to an ultrasonic unit (Satalec P5). Irrigants will be delivered to the apical 1/3 of the root canal through the needle at the same time the needle is being activated ultrasonically. Irrigant delivery will be controlled by a standard syringe pump. Conventional needle irrigation will be delivered using a 27guage slot needle placed into the root canal. Irrigants will be expressed with positive pressure at a location in the canal short of the needle binding
6. Once the first step of root canal therapy has been completed, the tooth will be extracted, decalcified, and tissue specimens will be taken from the bottom 3 mm. These sections will be evaluated under magnification and remaining debris in the root canal will be quantified using the NIH Image software. The data will be statistically analyzed to determine and differences between the two irrigation techniques.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Investigation of Chemomechanical Parameters for an Efficient Disinfection of the Root Canal
NCT06949176
Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on the Reduction of Bacteria and Endotoxins in Root Canals
NCT02917642
Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Versus Needle Irrigation on Postoperative Pain and Periapical Healing
NCT02913937
Comparison of Obturation Quality and Lateral Canal Fill (by Sealer): Ultrasonic-Activated Versus Non-Ultrasonic Conventional Irrigation Techniques in Root Canal Treatment - A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07303478
Bacterial Load Reduction by GentleWave and EdgePro Irrigation Systems in Mandibular Necrotic Molars
NCT06554366
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 2
For Group II, the ultrasonic irrigation system involves using an initial irrigation with a conventional syringe followed by ultrasonic irrigation.
Vista Ultrasonic Bleach Bypass System
The ultrasonic needle will be activated by depressing the foot pedal which will begin the debridement process. Irrigants will be delivered constantly at the recommended rate via the syringe pump and the needle tip will be moved up and down with a 2mm amplitude for the entire 1 minute activation cycle, which will deliver a total of 3ml of irrigant. The ultrasonic unit will be turned off and the needle will be withdrawn from the canal.
Group 1
For Group I, needle irrigation will be delivered into the pulp chamber using a syringe tip placed above the access opening and removed with high volume suction.
Needle Irrigation
irrigation with 3ml 6% NaOCl is performed moving the needle from just short of binding to 2mm coronal in constant motion for 60 seconds and left untouched in a full canal for 60 seconds.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vista Ultrasonic Bleach Bypass System
The ultrasonic needle will be activated by depressing the foot pedal which will begin the debridement process. Irrigants will be delivered constantly at the recommended rate via the syringe pump and the needle tip will be moved up and down with a 2mm amplitude for the entire 1 minute activation cycle, which will deliver a total of 3ml of irrigant. The ultrasonic unit will be turned off and the needle will be withdrawn from the canal.
Needle Irrigation
irrigation with 3ml 6% NaOCl is performed moving the needle from just short of binding to 2mm coronal in constant motion for 60 seconds and left untouched in a full canal for 60 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA 2
* Pts have current treatment plan at OHSU for extraction of some or all of remaining teeth and scheduled for delivery of a removable appliance post extraction
* Teeth used are able to be isolated with rubber dam
* Understand and sign consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* No current treatment plan at OHSU
* Severely carious teeth resulting in inability to isolate for procedure
* Unable to understand or sign consent form
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig Baumgartner, DDS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health & Science University: Grad Endodontology
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00004769
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.