Effect of Fructose on Colonic Microflora

NCT ID: NCT00775567

Last Updated: 2011-08-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fructose is the principal carbohydrate in fruits and is added to many food products. This 6 carbon sugar is associated with a number of ill effects, like promotion of high triglycerides,precipitation of gout in men,possible depression in women and symptoms of intolerance in a non ethnic dose dependent fashion.However, high fruit and vegetable intake is associated with some epidemiologic evidence in prevention of some cancers like stomach and colorectum.The principal protectors in these products are thought to be antioxidants and other protective chemicals like polyphenols.In addition long chain polymers of fructose:inulin are thought to help protect against cancer through prebiotic effects. In fact poly-fructose molecules are used as prebiotic food supplements and are promoted as aids for a healthy intestine with "balanced microflora".

Polyfructose prebiotics induce some gastrointestinal symptoms of cramps gas bloating and sometimes diarrhea.To date repeated consumption of these polyfructose molecules have not been shown to induce colonic adaptation. Nor is there evidence that fructose intolerant people "adapt " to prolonged ingestion.

These findings are in contrast to findings with lactose intolerance where prolonged ingestion leads to both symptomatic and physiological adaptation.In this interventional study we evaluate whether fructose intolerant people can adapt to moderate dose daily fructose ingestion.The desired outcome is symptomatic, physiological and colonic microfloral adaptation. A failure to detect an increase in bifidobacteria on retesting may suggest that in humans like in some other mammals GLUT5 fructose transport could be induced.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The concept of Colonic Adaptation(CA) to regular carbohydrates has been linked mainly to lactose disaccharide(galactose,glucose) and lactulose(galactose, fructose), a manufactured derivative of lactose. CA is achieved in both cases by short term regular consumption of the targeted sugar which is not digested by the host. The clinical definition of CA includes a measured change in breath hydrogen, reduction of clinical symptoms (Bloat, gas, cramps and at times diarrhea) and an associated increase of bacterial lactase(β-galactosidase. The putative mechanism is through bacterial action which results in enhanced metabolism or expanded bacterial population of specific genus and species of bacteria. The act of CA may incur health benefits through physicochemical changes and especially promotion of health promoting bacteria.

Maldigestion of fructose occurs in the population probably in a dose dependent fashion. The sugar content overwhelms the principal GLUT5 intestinal carrier. In the presence of glucose this non energy dependent system works better(11). In a previous publication we found that the pre test graded ingestion of fructose had no impact on test results. These results were dramatically different from that found for pretest lactose ingestion. The investigators interpreted the results from the fructose study as being consistent with a failure to show CA to regular fructose consumption.

More recently Rao et al however, showed that there may be a threshold level of intake beyond which fructose maldigestion may rapidly increase. This value was thought to be 15-20g. In the case of lactose this was 10g(15). Since in both our studies we used the same dose response analysis(\<10,11-19, and \>20g/d), it is possible that fructose consuming individuals might not have spilt adequate quantities of fructose into the colon to properly induce and maintain CA. Moreover, there is to our knowledge no information on a possible prebiotic effect of the monosaccharide fructose. Since polymers of fructose are very good prebiotics it may be of interest to determine whether this sugar is capable of prebiotic function in its own right.

The investigators propose to carry out a short term study on 20-30 healthy participants to determine whether a 2 week period of fructose consumption alters clinical CA and intestinal microflora.

Study Outline After an overnight fast, except for water(ad libitum), participants present themselves to the GI lab around 9 am. A 50 gm fructose solution (this dose is associated with a 65% chance of maldigestion(14))will be administered. Breath hydrogen and symptoms will be recorded for 4.5 Hrs at ½ hr intervals. Participants will be asked to fill out a short 3 day diet recall questionnaire targeting fructose ingestion.

Participants will be asked to consume 30g fructose in 150ml of water (lemon juice may be added) twice a day for 14 days.They will then return for a repeat50 g fructose challenge. A small stool sample will be asked from participants at each test period.Another similar group will undergo the same tests but without taking intervening fructose.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

30g fructose dissolved in water twice a day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fructose powder

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

30g in 250ml water twice a day

No Intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fructose powder

30g in 250ml water twice a day

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy participants

Exclusion Criteria

* Antibiotics 90 days pre entry
* Use of gastrointestinal motility drugs eg loperamide, metoclopramide significant fiber supplements
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

SMBD Jewish General Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew Szilagyi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

SMBD Jewish General Hospital, McGill university School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SMBD Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Szilagyi A, Malolepszy P, Yesovitch S, Vinokuroff C, Nathwani U, Cohen A, Xue X. Fructose malabsorption may be gender dependent and fails to show compensation by colonic adaptation. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Nov;52(11):2999-3004. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9652-9. Epub 2007 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17357833 (View on PubMed)

Rao SS, Attaluri A, Anderson L, Stumbo P. Ability of the normal human small intestine to absorb fructose: evaluation by breath testing. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;5(8):959-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17625977 (View on PubMed)

Szilagyi A, Malolepszy P, Yesovitch S, Nathwani U, Vinokuroff C, Cohen A, Xue X. Inverse dose effect of pretest dietary lactose intake on breath hydrogen results and symptoms in lactase nonpersistent subjects. Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Nov;50(11):2178-82. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-3028-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16240236 (View on PubMed)

Briet F, Achour L, Flourie B, Beaugerie L, Pellier P, Franchisseur C, Bornet F, Rambaud JC. Symptomatic response to varying levels of fructo-oligosaccharides consumed occasionally or regularly. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995 Jul;49(7):501-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7588500 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

07111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fructose Intestinal Gluconeogenesis
NCT07209202 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA