A Study of Taspoglutide Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Plus Pioglitazone.

NCT ID: NCT00744367

Last Updated: 2016-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

326 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 3 arm study will assess the efficacy of taspoglutide on glycemic control (as assessed by HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin plus pioglitazone, compared to placebo after 24 weeks of treatment. Patients will be randomized to one of 3 treatment arms: taspoglutide 10mg once weekly, taspoglutide 20 mg once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg once weekly) or placebo, in addition to their continued stable metformin plus pioglitazone treatment. After the first 24 weeks patients on placebo will be switched to taspoglutide 10mg once weekly or taspoglutide 20mg once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10mg once weekly. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Placebo in addition to continued stable metformin plus pioglitazone treatment. After the first 24 weeks patients on placebo will be switched to taspoglutide 10mg once weekly or taspoglutide 20mg once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10mg once weekly.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

\>1500 mg/day or maximum tolerated dose (MTD)

pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

\>= 30 mg/day

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

sc once weekly

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg sc once weekly;

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mg sc once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg sc once weekly)

Taspoglutide 10mg

Taspoglutide 10mg once weekly in addition to continued stable metformin plus pioglitazone treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

\>1500 mg/day or maximum tolerated dose (MTD)

pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

\>= 30 mg/day

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg sc once weekly;

Taspoglutide 10mg/20mg

Taspoglutide 20 mg once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg once weekly) in addition to continued stable metformin plus pioglitazone treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

\>1500 mg/day or maximum tolerated dose (MTD)

pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

\>= 30 mg/day

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mg sc once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg sc once weekly)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

metformin

\>1500 mg/day or maximum tolerated dose (MTD)

Intervention Type DRUG

pioglitazone

\>= 30 mg/day

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

sc once weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

10 mg sc once weekly;

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

20 mg sc once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg sc once weekly)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients, 18-75 years age;
* type 2 diabetes receiving pioglitazone (\>= 30 mg/day) and metformin (\>= 1500 mg/day) for at least 12 weeks prior to screening;
* HbA1c \>=7.0% and \<=10.0% at screening;
* BMI \>= 25 (\>23 for Asians) and \<=45 kg/m2 at screening;
* stable weight +/-5% for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* history of type 1 diabetes mellitus or acute metabolic diabetic complications such as ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma in the previous 6 months;
* evidence of clinically significant diabetic complications;
* clinically symptomatic gastrointestinal disease;
* myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, post-transplantation cardiomyopathy or stroke within the previous 6 months;
* known hemoglobinopathy or chronic anemia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hamden, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chiefland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Nampa, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Libertyville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Madisonville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ferndale, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Biloxi, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Hudson, New York, United States

Site Status

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Athens, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Beaver, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Carlisle, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Cranston, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Federal Way, Washington, United States

Site Status

Brasília, , Brazil

Site Status

Forlateza, , Brazil

Site Status

Fortaleza, , Brazil

Site Status

Fortaleza, , Brazil

Site Status

Fortaleza, , Brazil

Site Status

Mogi Das Cruzes - Sp, , Brazil

Site Status

Passo Fundo, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Recife, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

San José, , Costa Rica

Site Status

Bondy, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Narbonne, , France

Site Status

Falkensee, , Germany

Site Status

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Neuwied, , Germany

Site Status

Potsdam, , Germany

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Jalisco, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Carolina, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Guyanabo, San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Brazil Canada Costa Rica France Germany Guatemala Mexico Puerto Rico

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001744-39

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BC20963

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.