Evaluation of Education in the Secondary Prevention of Foot Ulceration in Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT00729456

Last Updated: 2008-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

172 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-04-30

Study Completion Date

2006-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was an attempt to confirm the results of an earlier experiment in which the benefit of an education programme was assessed in a group of people with diabetes complicated by ulceration of the foot. Foot ulcers are the source of considerable suffering and cost and carry a high risk of amputation: they are difficult to heal and approximately 40% recur in the first 12 months. The earlier experiment (published by Malone and colleagues in 1989) indicated that a single hour-long education session appeared to lead to a three-fold reduction in the numbers of ulcers which recurred after successful treatment. It was not possible to confirm these findings in the present study in which patients from three specialist clinics in Nottingham and Derby, UK, were allocated either to receive a one-to-one, individually targeted, education programme in the own home (and reinforced after one month by a telephone call), or to receive usual care. The group who received the education reported better recommended foot care behaviour (intended to minimise the risk of injury) at 12 months but despite this, there was no difference between the two groups in the percentage who suffered either a new ulcer (41% education versus 41% usual care) or amputation (10% and 11%, respectively). While the benefit of education is undeniable in general, it was not possible to show that this particular teaching session had an impact on the occurrence of new disease in this group of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a randomised controlled trial of the effect over 12 months of a one-to-one educational package designed to improve foot care behaviour in a group of patients at the highest risk of new foot disease: those with a recently healed ulcer. The primary outcome was the incidence of new ulceration at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included self-reported footcare behaviour, new ulceration at 6 months, amputation (major or minor) at 12 and 6 months, and measures of well-being (SF36; Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale, DFS short-form). The educational intervention was based on the content of the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot, 2003, was modified following discussion with a focus group of former ulcer sufferers, and included graphic images of different forms of foot disease. Although structured, the information was targeted in discussion to the individual's circumstances, and was delivered one-to-one in the patient's own home by a single health care professional. It was reinforced after one month by a semi-structured phone conversation with the same educator. Outcomes were determined by postal questionnaire, backed up with reminders and phone calls when necessary, as well questionnaires sent to GP staff and by searching hospital records. Foot care behaviour was assessed at 12 months using a newly devised and validated measure of footcare function (NAFF) which was also delivered by post. All outcomes were assessed by researchers blind to allocation group. Mean age was 64.9 (SD 10.9) years, and there were no differences between groups at baseline in terms of demographics, diabetes type and complications. The incidence (%) of new ulcers at 6 and 12 months was 26 (30%) and 36 (41%) in the intervention group and 18 (21%) and 35 (41%) in the controls, RR 0.997 (CI 0.776-1.280). There were no differences in any of the other outcome measures although the intervention group reported a higher score in recommended foot care behaviour when compared with controls (42.0 versus 38.7, p=0.03).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Foot Ulceration in Diabetes

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Diabetes Education Ulcer Foot Behaviour

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

2

Patients receive a single session, one-to-one workshop (carers may be included if appropriate) in their own home, lasting 60 - 120 minutes.

Group Type OTHER

Education

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients receive a single session, one-to-one workshop (carers may be included if appropriate) in their own home, lasting 60 - 120 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Education

Patients receive a single session, one-to-one workshop (carers may be included if appropriate) in their own home, lasting 60 - 120 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with diabetes and an ulcer of the foot which had been managed at one of the three participating centres and which had healed within the preceding 3 months, leaving them ulcer-free for at least 28 days

Exclusion Criteria

* Living in institutional care
* Documented history of dementia
* Other serious medical problems
* Non-English speaking and without an English-speaking carer
* Lived more than 50 miles from the centre
* Involved in another study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Diabetes UK

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William J Jeffcoate

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Derbyshire Royal Infirmary

Derbyshire, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham City Hospital

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Queens Medical Centre

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lincoln NB, Radford KA, Game FL, Jeffcoate WJ. Education for secondary prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2008 Nov;51(11):1954-61. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1110-0. Epub 2008 Aug 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18758747 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.futu.co.uk

Foot Ulcer Trials Unit

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

02ME06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id