Study to Test a Computer-assisted Support System to Improve Patient-centered Care and Symptom Relief in Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT00709813
Last Updated: 2011-07-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
145 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-12-31
2005-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study tested effects of CHOICE on symptom- related patient care and outcomes of symptom relief, patients' needs for care over time and patient satisfaction;(2) analyzed how patients' symptoms, needs for care varied during illness/treatment stages; and (3) evaluated CHOICE' ease of use and user satisfaction. Controlling for gender, age, diagnosis, and type/stage of treatment, education, depression, health related quality of life, and social support, repeated measurement models were used to test differences and variations in outcome variables within and between groups and over time.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Interactive Tailored Assessment on Patient-provider Communication
NCT00857103
Internet Support for Cancer Patients
NCT00710658
Feasibility and Acceptability of the Remote Oncology Symptom Assessment Application
NCT07218874
Mobile Application for Improving Symptoms and Adherence to Oral Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer
NCT02157519
The Ability of Electronic Patient Symptom Reporting to Reduce Symptom Burden During Hospitalization for Chemotherapy
NCT02574897
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
No interventions assigned to this group
2
Tailored assessments provided to physicians and nurses (CHOICE, the Computer-assisted Interactive Tailored Patient Assessment Tool (ITPA))
Both groups used CHOICE, the Computer-assisted Interactive Tailored Patient Assessment Tool (ITPA)for symptom assessments at in- and outpatient visits during and up-to nine months after treatment. In the intervention group physicians and nurses had assessment summaries available for care planning, displaying patients' symptoms, problems and concerns in rank-order of their needs for care. In the control group assessments were not available to care providers at any time.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tailored assessments provided to physicians and nurses (CHOICE, the Computer-assisted Interactive Tailored Patient Assessment Tool (ITPA))
Both groups used CHOICE, the Computer-assisted Interactive Tailored Patient Assessment Tool (ITPA)for symptom assessments at in- and outpatient visits during and up-to nine months after treatment. In the intervention group physicians and nurses had assessment summaries available for care planning, displaying patients' symptoms, problems and concerns in rank-order of their needs for care. In the control group assessments were not available to care providers at any time.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* starting treatment for a recurrence of the disease;
* starting treatment with allogenous or autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT).
* above 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Research Council of Norway
OTHER
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet HF
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cornelia M Ruland, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ruland CM. Clinicians' perceived usefulness of a support system for patient-centered cancer care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:624-30.
Ruland CM, Bakken S, Roislien J. Reliability and validity issues related to interactive tailored patient assessments: a case study. J Med Internet Res. 2007 Aug 1;9(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RCN 154739/320
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.