Adaptive Symptom Self-Management Immunotherapy Study

NCT ID: NCT05715255

Last Updated: 2025-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-08

Study Completion Date

2027-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), alone or in combination with other cancer treatments is increasing dramatically with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) common (90%) during ICI treatment. Most irAEs are symptomatic and symptom self-management with timely reporting of moderate or severe symptoms to health care providers (HCPs) may reduce irAE severity by early recognition and management, resulting in fewer treatment interruptions and unscheduled health services.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Using a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design, the study team will initially randomize 286 diverse survivors (30% Hispanic) who are within 12 weeks of starting ICIs and who also have elevated psychological distress to an Automated Telephone Symptom Management (ATSM) or to an active control condition. ATSM consists of weekly telephone symptom monitoring using the Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) items by an automated voice response technology. Participants are referred to a printed Handbook with information about symptoms, evidence-based self-management strategies, and when to report symptoms to HCPs. ATSM automatically sends a weekly symptom summary to HCPs. Active control survivors will receive automated symptom monitoring only with reports sent to HCPs. Survivors in ATSM whose psychological distress is still elevated for 2 consecutive weeks during weeks 2-8 (nonresponders) will be randomized for the second time to add TIPC for 8 weeks or continue with ATSM alone. The study team hypothesizes adding TIPC will improve self-efficacy for symptom self-management, including communication with HCPs and increase social support resulting in lower indices of psychological distress, other PRO-CTCAE symptoms, clinician-documented irAES (primary outcomes), and unscheduled health services use and ICI treatment interruptions (secondary outcomes). With total intervention time of 16 weeks, all survivors will be interviewed at baseline and week 17 post-intervention, and electronic health record data will be extracted for the participation period.

Specific aims:

Aim 1. Determine if primary and secondary outcomes over weeks 1-17 are lower (better) in the group created by the first randomization: the adaptive intervention that begins with ATSM with the need-based addition of TIPC vs. active control group.

Aim 2. Among those not responding to ATSM on psychological distress during weeks 2-8 who enter the second randomization, determine: a) if primary and secondary outcomes over weeks 8-17 are lower (better) in TIPC+ATSM vs. ATSM alone group; b) the extent to which the effects of adding TIPC to ATSM on primary and secondary outcomes are mediated by increased social support, self-efficacy for symptom management and for communication with HCP.

Aim 3. Explore which baseline characteristics of the survivor, cancer, and cancer treatment are associated with optimal primary and secondary outcomes resulting from three supportive care options: 1) symptom monitoring only with automated reports to HCPs (active control); 2) ATSM alone for 16 weeks; or 3) addition of 8 weeks of TIPC to ATSM if no response on psychological distress during weeks 2-8.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Colon Cancer Lung Cancer Skin Cancer Rectum Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Adaptive Intervention

The adaptive intervention sequence is assumed to affect psychological distress (depression and anxiety) severity of other symptoms and irAEs, as tested in Aim 1. Both the Automated Telephone Symptom Management (ATSM) system and the Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIP-C) interventions help participants to identify and understand troublesome symptoms, with suggestions to effectively self-manage these symptoms. The proposed interventions are expected to alleviate burdensome symptoms through several key mediating variables, as tested in Aim 2.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Automated Telephone Symptom Management (ATMS) and Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIP-C)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants randomized to the adaptive intervention are telephoned weekly and asked to enter by pin-pad or voice the severity of the PRO-CTCAE items on a 0-4 scale, with 0 being none and 4 being very severe. Participants are mailed the Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook in their preferred language (English or Spanish). Survivors who rated any item at moderate or higher (2-4) will be referred by the ATSM to read the corresponding chapters in the Handbook and given a call back in 24 hours to inquire about the severity of the reported symptom, whether it has improved or worsened, and whether the participant reported it to their HCP, or the HCP has contacted the survivor. Participants that report elevated symptoms for two consecutive weeks are rerandomized to continue the ATSM alone or continue the ATSM with TIP-C added for 8 weeks. TIP-C is delivered by a masters prepared counselor with cancer expertise via weekly 30-minute phone calls using interpersonal techniques.

Active Control

Survivors in the active control will receive weekly AVR assessments of PROCTCAE symptoms, and summary of these assessments will be sent securely to HCPs. Survivors will not receive the Handbook and will not be prompted by the AVR to contact HCPs unless the symptoms are severe. An active control comparator was purposively selected to enable a more rigorous testing of intervention effectiveness in Aims 1 and 2. Also, the study team will be better able to address the question about which channel of communication (automated versus survivor initiated) results in better outcomes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Active control comparator

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Survivors in the active control will receive weekly AVR assessments of PROCTCAE symptoms, and summary of these assessments will be sent securely to HCPs. Survivors will not receive the Handbook and will not be prompted by the AVR to contact HCPs unless the symptoms are severe.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Automated Telephone Symptom Management (ATMS) and Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIP-C)

Participants randomized to the adaptive intervention are telephoned weekly and asked to enter by pin-pad or voice the severity of the PRO-CTCAE items on a 0-4 scale, with 0 being none and 4 being very severe. Participants are mailed the Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook in their preferred language (English or Spanish). Survivors who rated any item at moderate or higher (2-4) will be referred by the ATSM to read the corresponding chapters in the Handbook and given a call back in 24 hours to inquire about the severity of the reported symptom, whether it has improved or worsened, and whether the participant reported it to their HCP, or the HCP has contacted the survivor. Participants that report elevated symptoms for two consecutive weeks are rerandomized to continue the ATSM alone or continue the ATSM with TIP-C added for 8 weeks. TIP-C is delivered by a masters prepared counselor with cancer expertise via weekly 30-minute phone calls using interpersonal techniques.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Active control comparator

Survivors in the active control will receive weekly AVR assessments of PROCTCAE symptoms, and summary of these assessments will be sent securely to HCPs. Survivors will not receive the Handbook and will not be prompted by the AVR to contact HCPs unless the symptoms are severe.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 or older
* Within 12 weeks after starting ICI treatment for cancer
* Cognitively oriented to person, place and time (determined by recruiter)
* Able to speak and understand English or Spanish
* Access to a telephone
* Severity score of 1 (mild) or higher on at least 1 of the 3 indicators of psychological distress from the PRO-CTCAE (i.e., the three items of anxious, discouraged, sad) library

Exclusion Criteria

* Currently receiving regular behavioral counseling
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Arizona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Terry Badger, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arizona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Valleywise Health Medical Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Arizona Cancer Center

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Molly Hadeed

Role: CONTACT

520-626-0583

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Gilbert Ramos

Role: primary

480-344-2180

Molly Hadeed

Role: primary

520-626-0583

UACC IIT

Role: backup

Samantha Holmes

Role: primary

734-998-4425

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01CA263714-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00000719

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.