Post-chemotherapy Symptom Management SMART

NCT ID: NCT03494166

Last Updated: 2023-10-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

498 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Survivors of solid tumors (N=451) who completed curative intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor within the past 2 years were interviewed at baseline and stratified as high or low need for symptom management based on comorbidity and depressive symptoms.

High need survivors were randomized initially to the 12-week Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH, N=282) or 12-week SMSH Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC, N=93) added during weeks 1-8. After 4 weeks of the SMSH alone, non-responders on depression were re-randomized to continue with SMSH alone (N=30) or add TIPC (N=31).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Nearly 15.5 million Americans have survived cancer and virtually all have experienced symptoms from cancer treatment. Numerous symptom management interventions have been tested during active treatment, yet few have addressed the continuing fatigue, pain, depression, etc. that endure following the end of treatment.

Existing post-treatment symptom management research has targeted survivors months after the end of active treatment, overlooking the immediate post-treatment period. During this period, some survivors have their symptoms resolve naturally (low need for intervention), while others suffer from high symptom burden (high need for intervention), with 30% experiencing depression. Sample: Survivors of solid tumors (N=451) who completed curative intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor within the past 2 years.

Design: The SMART design incorporates two interventions with proven efficacy and addresses heterogeneity of survivors' responses by following the clinical logic of starting with one intervention, assessing its success, and continuing it when effective. High need survivors will be initially randomized to receive 1) weekly symptom assessment with referral for elevated symptoms to a printed Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH) or 2) a more intensive intervention adding Telephone Interpersonal Counselling (TIPC) to the SMSH. After 4 weeks, non-responders to SMSH alone on depression were re-randomized to continue SMSH for 8 more weeks to allow for symptom resolution, or TIPC added for the remaining 8 weeks.

The primary outcome was symptom severity index, secondary outcome was depressive symptoms. The hypotheses tests included comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes according tp first randomization and second randomization for non-responders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Following baseline, symptom management need (high versus low need) will be determined. The low need group will not receive interventions, but will be followed at week 4 for a brief symptom assessment and at week 13. The high need group will be randomly assigned to either: 1) SMSH alone or 2) TIP-C+SMSH for 8 weeks followed by continued 4 weeks of SMSH alone. We will mail the SMSH, printed in the survivor's preferred language, following randomization. All high need participants will receive weekly telephone contacts during weeks 1-12 to assess symptoms, deliver the assigned intervention, and assess intervention enactment and fidelity. After the initial 4 weeks, responders on depression will continue with the SMSH only. Non-responders will re-randomized to either continue with the SMSH alone or add TIP-C. Those initially randomized to TIP-C+SMSH will not be re-randomized. Total duration of each of the three intervention sequences is 12 weeks.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Data collectors will be blinded to the arm of the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low Need Benchmark or Follow-up

In the low need benchmark or follow-up group, survivors completed detailed baseline and 13-week assessments (about 30-40 minutes) over the telephone. A brief assessment (about 5 minutes) at week 4 over the telephone was used to assess symptoms.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

High Need A: Start with SMSH alone for 4 weeks

Participants were mailed the printed Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMH). The Group A participant was called every week for 4 weeks to ask about symptoms and suggest strategies from the SMH to relieve symptoms. After 4 weeks, participants were re-randomized to continue in SMH for 8 more weeks or to add Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC) Intervention for the subsequent 8 weeks. If the TIPC was added, the counselor called the participant once per week for about 35-40 minutes to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At week 13, the participant completed the second assessment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Start with SMSH alone

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

See arm/group descriptions

High Need B: Start with SMSH+TIPC

Participants were called every week for the first 8 weeks using a combination of TIP-C and SMH. The counselor called to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At the end of 8 weeks, the final 4 calls followed the SMSH alone protocol. At week 13, the second assessment was conducted.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Start with SMSH+TIPC

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

See arm/group descriptions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Start with SMSH+TIPC

See arm/group descriptions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Start with SMSH alone

See arm/group descriptions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Survivors must have a new diagnosis or localized recurrence of solid tumor cancer
* Be finishing curative intent adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation, and do not have any subsequent cancer treatments planned, except for radiation therapy, hormonal therapy or trastuzumab for breast cancer.
* 18 years of age or older
* Have access to a telephone
* Understand English or Spanish
* Are not currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in medical record verified by the recruiter
* Nursing home resident
* Bedridden
* Currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Michigan State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Arizona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Terry Badger, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arizona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer Center at St. Joseph's

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sikorskii A, Badger T, Segrin C, Crane TE, Chalasani P, Arslan W, Hadeed M, Morrill KE, Given C. A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial of Symptom Management After Chemotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jun;65(6):541-552.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36801353 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01CA225615

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1711069340

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Improving Care After Chemotherapy
NCT01944137 COMPLETED NA