Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Conventional Dose Versus High Dose
NCT ID: NCT00692107
Last Updated: 2008-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
669 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1997-06-30
2007-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives:
* To test in a phase III randomised study the hypothesis that higher radiation doses lead to a higher freedom from failure rate for localized prostate cancer.
* To test the hypothesis that a higher freedom from failure rate leads to a longer disease-free survival and overall survival.
* To limit acute and late toxicity with respect to gastro-intestinal and urological toxicity.
* To evaluate different PSA related endpoints for local failure and distant metastasis.
* To establish a database of patients treated to escalated doses with Dose Volume Histograms of the normal tissues at risk for each individual patient and common toxicity endpoints.
* To validate a model to estimate normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of rectum and bladder, based on the above-mentioned database, and to obtain reliable parameter values for NTCP estimations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
68 Gy
Gray
68 Gy vs. 78 Gy
2
78 Gy
Gray
68 Gy vs. 78 Gy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gray
68 Gy vs. 78 Gy
Gray
68 Gy vs. 78 Gy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* all T-stages with a PSA \< 60ng/ml, except any T1a tumor and well-differentiated (or Gleason score \< 5) T1b-c tumors with PSA-levels ≤ 4 ng/ml
* Karnofsky Performance Status of 80 or more
Exclusion Criteria
* positive regional lymph nodes proven by surgical or cytological sampling
* on anticoagulants
* previous prostatectomy
* previous pelvic irradiation
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Dutch Cancer Society
OTHER
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erasmus Medical Center / The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joos V Lebesque, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Zeeuws Radiotherapeutic Institute
Flushing, , Netherlands
Radiotherapeutic Institute Friesland
Leeuwarden, , Netherlands
Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peeters ST, Heemsbergen WD, van Putten WL, Slot A, Tabak H, Mens JW, Lebesque JV, Koper PC. Acute and late complications after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing 68 Gy to 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 15;61(4):1019-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.715.
Peeters ST, Hoogeman MS, Heemsbergen WD, Slot A, Tabak H, Koper PC, Lebesque JV. Volume and hormonal effects for acute side effects of rectum and bladder during conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 15;63(4):1142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.060. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
Kim S, Kong JH, Lee Y, Lee JY, Kang TW, Kong TH, Kim MH, You SH. Dose-escalated radiotherapy for clinically localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 8;3(3):CD012817. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012817.pub2.
Heemsbergen WD, Al-Mamgani A, Slot A, Dielwart MF, Lebesque JV. Long-term results of the Dutch randomized prostate cancer trial: impact of dose-escalation on local, biochemical, clinical failure, and survival. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jan;110(1):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.026. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CKVO 96-10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id