Comparison of HDR vs. LDR Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02692105
Last Updated: 2025-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-31
2026-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
LDR vs. HDR Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT03426748
Multi-omic Approach to Study HDR Brachytherapy for Favorable Risk and Low Tier Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT06200974
HDR Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT03424694
HDR Brachytherapy vs. LDR Brachytherapy Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT02628041
Improving Quality of Life After Prostate Brachytherapy: a Comparison of HDR and LDR Brachytherapy
NCT01936883
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To conduct a Phase III randomized trial for favorable tier intermediate risk prostate cancer and selected favorable risk tumors to evaluate the difference in Quality of Life in the urinary domain between LDR and HDR brachytherapy.
Hypothesis:
Because of more rapid dose delivery with HDR compared to LDR brachytherapy (15 minutes vs. 6 months) and more precise control of dose to adjacent critical structures (prostatic and bulbo-membranous urethra and anterior rectal wall), HDR prostate brachytherapy has been associated with more rapid recovery from acute symptoms and a more favorable side effect protocol when used as a boost in combination with external beam radiotherapy. The hypothesis is that this advantage will be maintained when brachytherapy is used as monotherapy without the addition of external beam radiation.
Justification:
In British Columbia, LDR prostate brachytherapy is the current standard for selected men with favorable risk prostate cancer who are not suitable for, or willing to accept active surveillance, and for men with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. LDR brachytherapy has been available in BC for over 15 years and is highly effective with 7-year biochemical disease-free rates of \~95%. However, this type of treatment has a prolonged recovery phase with return to baseline urinary function taking 6 to 12 months. This is partly due to the fact that the radiation is delivered over a 6 month period from the implanted seeds, and partly due to uncertainty in final seed placement. HDR brachytherapy has the advantage of delivering treatment very rapidly over 15-20 minutes, and also exploits the radiobiologic nature of prostate cancer which is more responsive to large doses of radiotherapy. Experience with using HDR brachytherapy as a boost has shown a much reduced impact on quality of life.
Objectives:
Primary: To evaluate the difference in QOL in the urinary domain between LDR and HDR brachytherapy using the urinary domain of the EPIC prostate cancer specific QOL questionnaire.
Secondary:
* To assess differences in the bowel and sexual domains of the EPIC prostate cancer specific QOL questionnaire between the 2 treatments
* To asses time to recovery of the IPS Score which is widely used to assess urinary function after prostate cancer treatment. The time to return to baseline +/- 3 points will be determined.
* Acute and long-term toxicity will be graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE V4) at each follow up time point
* TRUS- MRI fusion will be developed within our planning software to facilitate treatment planning
* To assess treatment efficacy, PSA will be recorded every 6 months to 5 years and then annually to 10 years and prostate re-biopsy will be performed at 36 months after radiotherapy.
Optional:
For those patients consenting to targeted biopsies under anaesthesia at the start of their brachytherapy procedure (separate consent)
* Verify MRI-TRUS fusion accuracy
* Correlate Cell Cycle Progression scores with outcome.
Research Method:
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)will be performed on all men as a staging procedure to ensure appropriateness for brachytherapy as monotherapy (without the addition of external beam radiotherapy or hormone therapy). The value of mpMRI in staging prostate cancer is widely recognized. Previous studies have shown that over 90% of intermediate risk cancers are visible on mpMRI. The MR images will be fused with the planning trans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) for each patient, ensuring adequate dose coverage of the lesion.
For those patients consenting to optional biopsies under anesthesia, accuracy of the fusion will be verified by obtaining 2 biopsies of the visualized lesion under TRUS guidance at the start of the brachytherapy procedure.
Follow up is as per standard practice to assess urinary, bowel and sexual side effects. In addition to the standard forms, patients will also complete an EPIC questionnaire. The questionnaires are completed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months to 3 years and then annually, as per the standard follow up schedule.
Once the biopsy material has been pathologically confirmed to contain the target lesion, the aggressiveness will be assessed through Cell Cycle Progression (CCP) Gene Profile testing.
Men may be randomized to the type of brachytherapy and decline the biopsies. This initial protocol is a Pilot that will test feasibility of the randomization (patient acceptance). The aim is to accrue 60 men over 18-24 months and if achieved then apply to expand to a total of 200 men.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low dose rate brachytherapy
Device: Radiation Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy is delivered under anaesthesia in a single 1.5-2 hour procedure as an out-patient. The men return 4 weeks later for detailed imaging to assess implant quality.
Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
Permanent implantation of radioactive Iodine-125 seeds under anesthesia with ultrasound guidance
High dose rate brachytherapy
Device: Radiation High dose rate prostate brachytherapy is delivered in 2 procedures, 2 weeks apart, also under anaesthesia, but no follow-up imaging visit is required.
HDR brachytherapy is also accomplished as an out-patient.
High Dose Rate prostate brachytherapy
Temporary implantation of radioactive material into the prostate in the form of a stepping source of Iridium 192 that travels through 16-18 needles or catheters strategically placed through the prostate
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
Permanent implantation of radioactive Iodine-125 seeds under anesthesia with ultrasound guidance
High Dose Rate prostate brachytherapy
Temporary implantation of radioactive material into the prostate in the form of a stepping source of Iridium 192 that travels through 16-18 needles or catheters strategically placed through the prostate
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ECOG 0-1
* Low tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer is defined by;
o a single NCCN intermediate risk factor (either Gleason 7(3+4) and PSA \< 10 ng/ml OR Gleason 6 and PSA 10-20 ng/ml)
* Extensive favorable-risk disease is defined as:
* clinical stage T1c-T2a
* PSA \< 10
* Gleason 6
* ≥ 50% of biopsy cores containing cancer
* PSA density \> 0.2 ng/cc
* Selected intermediate risk patients not defined above
* \- T1c/T2a
* \- PSA \< 10
* -Gleason 4+3
* -\< 33% of cores involved
* -Max tumour length in any core 10 mm
* No androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
* Prostate volume by TRUS ≤ 60 cc.
* Not eligible for, or accepting of, active surveillance according to NCCN guidelines.
* Signed study specific informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior pelvic radiation
* Prior chemotherapy for prostate cancer,
* Prior TURP or cryosurgery of the prostate
* Claustrophobic or unable to undergo MRI
40 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
British Columbia Cancer Agency
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Juanita Crook
Professor of Radiation Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ross Halperin, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
British Columbia Cancer Agency Program Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
British Columbia Cancer Agency Center for the Southern Interior
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Crook J, Ots A, Gaztanaga M, Schmid M, Araujo C, Hilts M, Batchelar D, Parker B, Bachand F, Milette MP. Ultrasound-planned high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: dose painting to the dominant intraprostatic lesion. Brachytherapy. 2014 Sep-Oct;13(5):433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Batchelar D, Gaztanaga M, Schmid M, Araujo C, Bachand F, Crook J. Validation study of ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning compared with CT-based planning. Brachytherapy. 2014 Jan-Feb;13(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
Schmid M, Crook JM, Batchelar D, Araujo C, Petrik D, Kim D, Halperin R. A phantom study to assess accuracy of needle identification in real-time planning of ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate prostate implants. Brachytherapy. 2013 Jan-Feb;12(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H15-02103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.