Comparison of Korean Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Botox in the Treatment of Essential Blepharospasm

NCT ID: NCT00682760

Last Updated: 2008-05-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-10-31

Study Completion Date

2006-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the efficacy and safety of Korean botulinum toxin A (KbtxA, Pacific Pharmaceuticals, Korea) against Botox in the treatment of essential blepharospasm, we performed a double-blinded, randomized, comparative trial comparing KbtxA and Botox for treatment of blepharospasm in 60 patients of the intention to treat population and 52 patients (26 patients from each group) of the per protocol population. The improvement of severity of spasm (SS) at 4 weeks post-injection as a primary efficacy outcome, qualifying non inferiority to the control group, Changes in eyelid closure force (CF) and functional visual status (FVS) after injection for secondary efficacy outcomes, and adverse effects for safety evaluation. Improvement of SS was noted in 90.3% of the KbtxA group and 86.2% of the Botox group. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in the changes of CF and FVS after injection (p\>0.05). Adverse effects developed in 16.1% of the KbtxA group and 27.6% of the Botox group, but no serious adverse events were found in either group. KbtxA was not inferior to Botox in treatment efficacy and was clinically safe with no serious adverse effects when used to treat essential blepharospasm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severity of spasm was graded clinically from grade 0 to 4. Primary efficacy outcome was assessed as the number (%) of patients with improved SS of more than 1 score at 4 weeks post-injection. Secondary efficacy outcome measures included the change in scores from baseline on the SS, closing force of eyelids, and functional visual status at 4 weeks post-injection. The duration of action (days), the time interval between injection and the moment that the patient felt the need for retreatment were also assessed as secondary efficacy outcomes.

The number (%) of patients with improvement of SS (primary efficacy outcome) and the change in scores from baseline at 4 weeks post-injection on the severity of spasm, closing force of eyelids, and functional visual status scores were not different between the KbtxA and Botox groups in the analysis of both the ITT and PP populations. Also, the duration of action was similar following KbtxA and Botox injections (two sample t-test, p=0.835). For the non-inferiority trial on primary efficacy outcome, KbtxA was not inferior to Botox in either the ITT or PP populations, as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (-1.76% for ITT, -1.64% for PP) was over the -15% threshold.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blepharospasm

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Botulinum Toxin Type A Blepharospasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Korean botulinum toxin A treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Korean Botulinum toxin type A (KbtxA) and Botox injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Each vial of Botox and KbtxA contained 100 U of BTX-A in a sterile vacuum-derived form without preservatives. Each vial of KbtxA was identical to the placebo (Botox) vial, and all vials were reconstituted with 2.0 mL of 0.9% sterile nonpreserved saline solution to a final dilution of 5 U /0.1 mL. The dose of BTX-A per injection site was 2.5 U to 5 U, and the location, number of injection sites. Using a 30-gauge needle, injections were angled away from the center of lid to reduce the risk of spread into the levator muscle. Injection sites include the upper medial and lateral eyelid margins, lower lateral lid margins, and above the eyebrow.

2

Botox treatment

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Korean Botulinum toxin type A (KbtxA) and Botox injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Each vial of Botox and KbtxA contained 100 U of BTX-A in a sterile vacuum-derived form without preservatives. Each vial of KbtxA was identical to the placebo (Botox) vial, and all vials were reconstituted with 2.0 mL of 0.9% sterile nonpreserved saline solution to a final dilution of 5 U /0.1 mL. The dose of BTX-A per injection site was 2.5 U to 5 U, and the location, number of injection sites. Using a 30-gauge needle, injections were angled away from the center of lid to reduce the risk of spread into the levator muscle. Injection sites include the upper medial and lateral eyelid margins, lower lateral lid margins, and above the eyebrow.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Korean Botulinum toxin type A (KbtxA) and Botox injection

Each vial of Botox and KbtxA contained 100 U of BTX-A in a sterile vacuum-derived form without preservatives. Each vial of KbtxA was identical to the placebo (Botox) vial, and all vials were reconstituted with 2.0 mL of 0.9% sterile nonpreserved saline solution to a final dilution of 5 U /0.1 mL. The dose of BTX-A per injection site was 2.5 U to 5 U, and the location, number of injection sites. Using a 30-gauge needle, injections were angled away from the center of lid to reduce the risk of spread into the levator muscle. Injection sites include the upper medial and lateral eyelid margins, lower lateral lid margins, and above the eyebrow.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

arm1 ; Meditoxin or Neuronox

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients, aged between 18 and 75 years old, had confirmed diagnoses of bilateral essential blepharospasm.
* The patients were recruited from two botulinum toxin clinics (Yonsei University and Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea) from October 18, 2005 until February 21, 2006.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were not eligible for inclusion in the study if they

* had undergone either myectomy or neurectomy
* had received anti-spastic, muscle relaxant medication within 1 month of study entry
* had been injected previously with BTX-A within 3 months of study entry
* had any muscle disorder
* Women with positive urine pregnancy test, or who were pregnant or lactating were also excluded from the study.
* In addition, patients who had shown hypersensitivity to BTX-A previously were not eligible for inclusion in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pacific Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of ophthalmology, Yonsei university College of Medicine

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sang Y Lee, MD, phD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yonsei University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sang Yeul Lee

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stone AV, Ma J, Whitlock PW, Koman LA, Smith TL, Smith BP, Callahan MF. Effects of Botox and Neuronox on muscle force generation in mice. J Orthop Res. 2007 Dec;25(12):1658-64. doi: 10.1002/jor.20450.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17600825 (View on PubMed)

Yoon JS, Kim JC, Lee SY. Double-blind, randomized, comparative study of Meditoxin versus Botox in the treatment of essential blepharospasm. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;23(3):137-41. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.3.137. Epub 2009 Sep 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19794937 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Meditoxin-05-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Meditoxin_Botox

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id