Clinical Performance of Therapeutic Use of BTX for Bruxism

NCT ID: NCT06258070

Last Updated: 2024-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-01

Study Completion Date

2017-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the performance of botulinum toxin (BTX) injections for bruxism. Participants were divided into two groups according to the duration of the symptoms. The main question is whether BTX should be reserved for long-standing bruxism where the conventional methods failed or indicated as a first-line treatment. The investigator also compared the required doses and the frequency of treatment sessions between these two groups for a complete recovery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The effectiveness of botulinum toxin (BTX) in treating bruxism is recognized and well-established. This study aims to provide the most suitable condition for a better performance of BTX injections.

This retrospective study of a single-arm trial was conducted using a medical database of 67 patients who suffered from bruxism between 2009 and 2015, and who had total recovery after injection sessions. Patients were divided into two groups based on the duration of their bruxism. The main outcomes measured were: pain relief, the total number of injection sessions until total recovery, doses of BTX used, and recovery duration between two consecutive sessions. The treatment was stopped when bruxism disappeared.

The investigator carried out injections using Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany). The toxin was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U. The patient received the same doses in each session, delivered to trigger points (TrPs). 0.05 ml was injected into each TrP.

The level of statistical significance was set at p \< 0,01. The Chi-square test and ANOVA table were used to compare differences according to injection sessions, doses of BTX, TrPs, and recovery duration between the two groups (with long-standing bruxism, and recent bruxism).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myofascial Pain Syndrome Myofascial Trigger Point Pain Bruxism Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A retrospective cohort study of two samples of participants ( group with long-standing for more than one year, group with recent symptoms for less than one year), with a single-arm trial (all the participants had the same treatment).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Duration of symptoms before BTX injections

All the participants received BTX injections. Informed consent was obtained. Doses and sessions of injections varied between them according to the time of recurrence and the duration of the primary symptoms.

The investigator carried out injections using Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany). The toxin was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U. The patient received the same doses in each session, delivered to TrPs detected by carefully palpating the muscle. 0.05 ml was injected into each TrPs.

Group Type OTHER

Abobotulinumtoxin A injection for bruxism

Intervention Type OTHER

Trigger points were detected with careful palpating of the masticatory muscles (masseter and temporalis muscles) of patients suffering from bruxism. Each trigger point received 0,05 lm ol reconstituted solution of Abobotulinumtoxin A. Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany) was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abobotulinumtoxin A injection for bruxism

Trigger points were detected with careful palpating of the masticatory muscles (masseter and temporalis muscles) of patients suffering from bruxism. Each trigger point received 0,05 lm ol reconstituted solution of Abobotulinumtoxin A. Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany) was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Botulinum toxin injection for bruxism

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who self-reported having awake bruxism and recovered completely following BTX injections during the period ranging between 2009 and 2015. It includes patients who had previously occlusal splints and who should stop their use once the BTX injections were started.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients suffering from temporomandibular disorders or having a contraindication to BTX injection.
Minimum Eligible Age

37 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

61 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mohamed Tahar Maamouri University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Imen Turki Mehri, MD

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Imen Mehri Turki, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University hospital Mohamed Tahar Maamouri. Nabeul, Tunisia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Imen Mehri Turki

Nabeul, , Tunisia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Tunisia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

University hospital Maamouri

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of BTX Injections in Treatment of Bruxism
NCT05980559 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3
Bruxism Xeomin® Intervention Trial
NCT04792398 UNKNOWN PHASE4