Clinical Performance of Therapeutic Use of BTX for Bruxism
NCT ID: NCT06258070
Last Updated: 2024-02-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
67 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-09-01
2017-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Botulinum Toxin A Injectable Solution in the Management of Bruxism: A Clinical Trial Study
NCT03827122
Botox for Treatment of TMJ Disorder With Bruxism
NCT02202070
Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Bruxism-related Symptomatology
NCT04722809
The Use of Low-Dose Botulinum Toxin Injection Into the Masseter Muscle to Treat Sleep Bruxism
NCT05620316
Botulinum Toxin in the Management of Temporo-mandibular Related Myalgia: a Prospective Study
NCT06677216
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This retrospective study of a single-arm trial was conducted using a medical database of 67 patients who suffered from bruxism between 2009 and 2015, and who had total recovery after injection sessions. Patients were divided into two groups based on the duration of their bruxism. The main outcomes measured were: pain relief, the total number of injection sessions until total recovery, doses of BTX used, and recovery duration between two consecutive sessions. The treatment was stopped when bruxism disappeared.
The investigator carried out injections using Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany). The toxin was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U. The patient received the same doses in each session, delivered to trigger points (TrPs). 0.05 ml was injected into each TrP.
The level of statistical significance was set at p \< 0,01. The Chi-square test and ANOVA table were used to compare differences according to injection sessions, doses of BTX, TrPs, and recovery duration between the two groups (with long-standing bruxism, and recent bruxism).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Duration of symptoms before BTX injections
All the participants received BTX injections. Informed consent was obtained. Doses and sessions of injections varied between them according to the time of recurrence and the duration of the primary symptoms.
The investigator carried out injections using Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany). The toxin was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U. The patient received the same doses in each session, delivered to TrPs detected by carefully palpating the muscle. 0.05 ml was injected into each TrPs.
Abobotulinumtoxin A injection for bruxism
Trigger points were detected with careful palpating of the masticatory muscles (masseter and temporalis muscles) of patients suffering from bruxism. Each trigger point received 0,05 lm ol reconstituted solution of Abobotulinumtoxin A. Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany) was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Abobotulinumtoxin A injection for bruxism
Trigger points were detected with careful palpating of the masticatory muscles (masseter and temporalis muscles) of patients suffering from bruxism. Each trigger point received 0,05 lm ol reconstituted solution of Abobotulinumtoxin A. Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany) was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
37 Years
61 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mohamed Tahar Maamouri University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Imen Turki Mehri, MD
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Imen Mehri Turki, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University hospital Mohamed Tahar Maamouri. Nabeul, Tunisia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Imen Mehri Turki
Nabeul, , Tunisia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
University hospital Maamouri
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.