Learning and Relationships in Primary Care

NCT ID: NCT00657696

Last Updated: 2017-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

7905 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-28

Study Completion Date

2012-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Within every primary care clinic is a small team of people who provide care to a group of patients who consider this clinic to be their medical home. Rapid advances in medical knowledge and technology require that these teams constantly adapt so that they can provide the best care to their patients. The goal of this study is to examine how people in these primary care teams learn and relate to each other as they change an adapt. This will be done by observing and interviewing people who work in these teams and by giving them and their patients a survey to fill out. We will then look at the performance of these clinics to see if it is related to how they learn and the quality of their relationships. Our ultimate goal is to design effective interventions that will improve the quality and outcomes of care received by Veterans in primary care outpatient clinics within the VHA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anticipated Impacts on Veterans Healthcare: Our ultimate goal is to improve the health of veterans by designing interventions at the clinical microsystem level that will facilitate the integration of KM-SD roles in primary care through improving relationships and learning. We anticipate that such a cross-cutting intervention has the potential to improve clinical performance as well as staff and patient satisfaction. If we are successful, this could be a breakthrough in the efficiency of VA organizational change. Project Background: The way in which we conceptualize the basic nature of the primary care clinic (PCC) greatly influences our beliefs and ideas about what should work to improve its operations. If we view it as a production line, then we design our improvement efforts using systems engineering techniques aimed at standardizing, reducing variation, and improving efficiency. If instead we view the PCC as an organic and complex social system, then we might design our improvement efforts using methods designed to embrace rather than eliminate surprise (which is inevitable in health care settings), to enhance the connections and communication between the individuals in the PCC rather than focusing on improving the skill sets of the individuals, and to use feedback and time for reflection as part of a strategy for the PCC to make sense of their own operations and behaviors in relation to their mission and goals. For the purpose of this proposal, this latter approach will be denoted by the term knowledge management techniques. We propose to study whether PCC performance correlates with the presence of higher levels of use of knowledge management techniques within PCCs. The VA has been in the forefront of implementing some knowledge management practices, such as sue of performance data systems and integrated health records, but has not yet paid sufficient attention to other such as relationship management, increasing diversity in decision making, active learning, and sense-making. Project Objectives: Describe the range of knowledge management techniques, including relationship management and active learning) currently employed by 15 VA and 5 VA contract PCCs. 2. Analyze the relationship between the nature and roles of relationships and learning in PCCs and their performance across multiple outcomes including clinical performance measures, worker satisfaction and turnover, and patient satisfaction. Our research propositions are: (1) High performing PCCs exhibit higher quality relationships and more active learning than low performing clinics; (2) The quality of relationship within PCCs will have the largest effects on worker and patient satisfaction. Research Propositions: 1. High performing VA and VA contract primary care clinics will exhibit higher quality relationships and more active learning than low performing clinics. 2.a. Variation in temporal change in both relationships and learning among the 20 clinics over the 30 months will be observed. 2.b. The temporal change in relationships (such as stable, improving or deteriorating between adjacent years) will be associated with a similar temporal change in patient and employee satisfaction.2 c. The temporal change in learning (such as stable, improving or deteriorating between adjacent years) will be associated with a similar temporal change in process of care quality indicators and with intermediate clinical outcomes. Project Methods: Descriptive, iterative study of 15 VA and 5 VA contract primary care clinics within VISN 17. Using ethnographic, qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, each clinic will be profiled on the nature of relationships between staff and between staff and patients and the nature of learning. Clinical outcomes (patient functional status, BP, cholesterol, HgA1c, preventable admissions), patient satisfaction, employee satisfaction and turnover will serve as outcomes. The association of these outcomes with the nature of relationships and learning will be explored qualitatively and quantitatively. Stability of these profiles will be evaluated in two subsequent waves of data collection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Physicians and staff in VA non-contract primary care outpatient clinics and patients seen in last 12 months in the same clinics

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 2

Patients seen in last 12 months in Group 1 clinics

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Clinician or clinical staff in a non-contract VA primary care outpatient clinic.
2. Patient seen in a non-contract VA primary care outpatient clinic in the prior 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria

None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jacqueline A Pugh, MD BA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 06-063

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Feasibility of Care Coordination
NCT04171596 COMPLETED NA
My Life, My Healthcare
NCT03017196 COMPLETED NA
Primary Care Transition Study
NCT01750892 COMPLETED NA
Evaluation of the Primary Care First Model
NCT06617533 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING