The Impact of Patient Complexity on Healthcare Utilization

NCT ID: NCT03327896

Last Updated: 2017-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-15

Study Completion Date

2018-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Healthcare providers are routinely being assessed for metrics designed to assess the quality of the care they deliver. There is growing consensus that these measurements, which typically assess the percentage of patients meeting a specific standard of care, should be adjusted for the clinical complexity of the providers. This study will assess whether adjusting for the social complexity of the patient panel adds significantly to adjustment for clinical complexity in explaining apparent differences in quality of care provided by Primary care providers and clinics.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The analysis will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, indicators of social complexity (as assessed by characteristics of the patients' geocoded addresses) will be tested for significant association with patient level outcomes (meeting or not meeting a specific standard of care). These indicators will be assessed in 4 cohorts: 2 cohorts of patients identified in electronic health records of Clinical Research Networks of community health centers, and 2 cohorts of patients insured by Medicaid in 2015 (Oregon and Florida Medicaid cohorts). Due to limitations in the available data, some quality indicators can only be evaluated in a subset of the cohorts. The consistency of specific social complexity indicators, referred to as Community Vital Signs (CVS), will be evaluated across the cohorts and quality metrics.

In the second stage, CVS indicators that contributed consistently to models at the patient level will be evaluated for their effect on provider ranking on quality metrics if the metrics are adjusted for the social complexity of the providers' patient panel in addition to the panels' clinical complexity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Care Quality Metrics Well Child Visits in First 15 Months of Life NQF 1392 Diabetes Mellitus NQF 0059 Colorectal Cancer Screening NQF 0034 Emergency Department Utilization Alcohol and Drug Screening

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Quality Measures, Social Determinants of Health

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OCHIN EHR

Patients who were established patients at OCHIN Primary Care Clinics in 2015 and had a face to face visit at the clinic in 2015.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

Charlson score and Community Social Deprivation

Intervention Type OTHER

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.

OneFlorida EHR

Patients who were established patients at OneFlorida Primary Care clinics in 2015 and had a face to fact visit at the clinic in 2015.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

Charlson score and Community Social Deprivation

Intervention Type OTHER

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.

Oregon Medicaid

Clients who were continuously insured through Oregon Medicaid in 2015 and had a claim with an Evaluation and Management Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code indicating an office visit listing a Primary Care provider as the performing provider.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

Charlson score and Community Social Deprivation

Intervention Type OTHER

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.

Florida Medicaid

Clients who were continuously insured through Florida Medicaid in 2015 and had a claim with an Evaluation and Management Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code indicating an office visit listing a Primary Care provider as the performing provider. Florida Medicaid data is limited to clients who were 22 years or younger.

Inclusion criteria for specific outcomes varies by criteria for demoninator specification for the metric.

Charlson score and Community Social Deprivation

Intervention Type OTHER

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Charlson score and Community Social Deprivation

This is an observational study of the association of clinical comorbidity and neighborhood social deprivation characteristics with healthcare performance assessment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria for clinics: Clinics must be a clinic that offers Primary Care (Family Medicine Clinics, Pediatrics Clinics, General Practice Clinics, Internal Medicine clinics that are not limited to a subspecialty focus, and multi-specialty clinics that include primary care providers as part of a comprehensive care team.) Clinics must have implemented their EHR by 1/1/2014.

Inclusion criteria for patients: EHR Patients must be established patients within a health care system: at least one ambulatory visit to an included clinic in 2015 and at least 1 visit to a primary care clinic within the same health system prior to that visit.

Inclusion criteria for patients for Medicaid based Outcomes: Patient must have been continuously covered by Medicaid in 2015 and have had at least 1 visit billed as an office visit in 2015 with a provider identified as a primary care provider and at least 1 prior claim billed to the same provider. Patients must meet the age/condition criteria for the assessment of at least 1 secondary outcome.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for patients: Patients with no geocoded address on file will be excluded from the analysis.

Exclusion criteria for patients for Medicaid based Outcomes: Patient with Medicaid coverage gaps of \>45 days will be excluded from theses analyses. Exclusion criteria for providers: Providers with \<20 patients in any Quality metric denominator.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

OCHIN, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abigail Sears, MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

OCHIN, Inc.

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hughes LS, Phillips RL Jr, DeVoe JE, Bazemore AW. Community Vital Signs: Taking the Pulse of the Community While Caring for Patients. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):419-22. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150172.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27170802 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSD-1603-34987

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id