Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
225 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-01
2021-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The UCLA Health DOM Quality team is leading the implementation and evaluation of this new incentive plan across our primary care network. In addition, the DOM Quality team has partnered with the UCLA Anderson School of Management to study the most efficacious ways to frame and communicate performance based incentives.
Understanding the factors that motivate physicians to deliver the highest quality primary care will provide pivotal insights into the successful implementation of performance based programs nationwide. The investigators believe that physicians who receive communication built on behavioral principles will demonstrate more motivation towards and success at meeting national primary care screening guidelines.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Report Cards and Feedback for PCCE
NCT06155292
Incentives for Primary Care Use in a Safety Net Setting
NCT02922855
Study of Medical Assistant Health Coaching in Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Conditions
NCT01220336
Primary Care Evidence-based Approach for Improving Lifelong Health
NCT06526312
Evaluation of the Primary Care First Model
NCT06617533
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators will implement a three-arm experimental communication campaign that includes monthly messages. The communication strategy will utilize behavioral change theory (particularly social comparison and recognition) to improve physician performance in health maintenance quality metrics.
This study will primarily focus on one quality domain of the PCCE incentive program-Clinical Quality. Two further quality domains of the PCCE incentive program will serve as exploratory measures: Patient Experience and Professional Participation.
For the primary outcome measure and high-priority secondary outcome measures, the investigators will first evaluate whether the combination of arms 2 and 3 differs from arm 1 in terms of the measures listed in the Outcome Measures section. If this comparison is statistically significant, the investigators will next compare arms 1 vs 2. and then, if also significant, the investigators will compare arms 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 3. For the 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 3 comparisons, we will use a Holm-Bonferroni p-value correction. These comparisons of treatment arms will be performed at the patient level using a mixed effects regression model, including random physician and clinic effects to account for clustering of patients. Control variables include (1) patient baseline order rates (or completion rates depending on the outcome measure) in July-October 2019, (2) patient characteristics (age, gender, comorbidity, insurance plan, zip code), and (3) physician characteristics (gender, race, years practiced, years at UCLA Health). Unless otherwise specified, p-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: Standard Communication Arm
Monthly email communication: Monthly standard communication via email informing physicians of their health maintenance completion rate over the prior three-month period. The email will also include a link to the performance dashboard, a link to a FAQ page that outlines their incentive plan, a link to helpful resources such as care guidelines, key tips from top performers, the quality measure on which they are performing the best, and the two quality measures that they could improve on the most.
Standard communication email
This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.
Arm 2: Arm 1 Message + Social Comparison Intervention
Monthly email communication as in Arm 1
Social comparison: In addition to the information given in Arm 1 email messaging, physicians in this arm will receive a list of the names of the top 25 performers from the prior month, and a high performer benchmark. Each physician in this group will receive a personalized message and subject line based on where in the performance distribution they fall (categories: top 25 performers, high performers, nearly high performers, and low performers). Message content will incorporate language utilizing principles of social comparison theory.
Standard communication email
This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.
Social comparison Intervention
The social comparison is added onto the standard communication email to provide some peer comparison between the physicians.
Arm 3: Arm 2 Interventions + Leadership training
Monthly email communication as in Arm 1 and Arm 2.
Social comparison as in Arm 2.
Quality improvement leadership training: Physician leads and clinic managers within clinics randomized to Group 3 will receive an in-person quality improvement and primary care clinic performance training, using the principles of quality improvement, self-determination theory and social comparison. Clinic leaders will be trained on how to guide these conversations, formulate their own performance/quality improvement goals, design effective strategies to reach these goals, and track their clinic's progress. Check-in emails and calls will be provided on a monthly basis to follow up on clinic-based quality improvement efforts and share key take-aways from the new Primary Care Clinical Excellence Recognition Program. This program aims to support a positive and collaborative culture of clinical excellence by recognizing and sharing best practices from high performing physicians and clinical teams.
Standard communication email
This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.
Social comparison Intervention
The social comparison is added onto the standard communication email to provide some peer comparison between the physicians.
Leadership Training
Clinic and Physician leads will be provided with a clinic leadership training seminars in leadership, quality improvement, and support from the Quality Improvement team at UCLA Health.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard communication email
This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.
Social comparison Intervention
The social comparison is added onto the standard communication email to provide some peer comparison between the physicians.
Leadership Training
Clinic and Physician leads will be provided with a clinic leadership training seminars in leadership, quality improvement, and support from the Quality Improvement team at UCLA Health.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical full-time employee level (FTE) of ≥ 40% at the beginning of the intervention period.
* Eligible to receive performance-based financial incentive as determined by the Department of Medicine.
* Panel size \>50 patients before the first intervention email was sent
* Patients, with at least one Health Maintenance topic open before or during at least one visit that takes place with a physician enrolled in the study between November 5, 2019 and March 3, 2020.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not a primary care physician with the following specialties: Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, or Family Medicine.
* Clinical FTE \< 40%.
* Not eligible to receive performance-based financial incentive as determined by the Department of Medicine.
* Panel size greater than 50 patients before the first intervention email was sent.
* Patients that are not seen by a provider enrolled in the study period.
* Patients seen by physician in the study with no Health Maintenance topics open before or during any visit that takes place between November 5, 2019 and March 3, 2020.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel M. Croymans, MD, MBA, MS
Primary Care Physician
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCLA Health Department of Medicine, Quality Office
Brentwood, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12345
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.