Primary Care Clinical Excellence Incentive Study

NCT ID: NCT04237883

Last Updated: 2021-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-01

Study Completion Date

2021-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

As part of UCLA Health's commitment to developing a premier integrated health system built on a foundation of physician-led, team-based primary care, the Department of Medicine (DOM) recently implemented a new performance based incentive plan called the Primary Care Clinical Excellence (PCCE) Incentive Plan. This incentive plan was developed to motivate providers to improve health maintenance screening rates.

The UCLA Health DOM Quality team is leading the implementation and evaluation of this new incentive plan across our primary care network. In addition, the DOM Quality team has partnered with the UCLA Anderson School of Management to study the most efficacious ways to frame and communicate performance based incentives.

Understanding the factors that motivate physicians to deliver the highest quality primary care will provide pivotal insights into the successful implementation of performance based programs nationwide. The investigators believe that physicians who receive communication built on behavioral principles will demonstrate more motivation towards and success at meeting national primary care screening guidelines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, UCLA Health has 42 primary care clinics staffed with approximately 205 PCP's serving more than 300,000 patients. In order to improve health maintenance screening rates associated with the performance based program, the investigators will use a communication strategy that leverages behavioral principles to motivate providers to improve health maintenance screening rates.

The investigators will implement a three-arm experimental communication campaign that includes monthly messages. The communication strategy will utilize behavioral change theory (particularly social comparison and recognition) to improve physician performance in health maintenance quality metrics.

This study will primarily focus on one quality domain of the PCCE incentive program-Clinical Quality. Two further quality domains of the PCCE incentive program will serve as exploratory measures: Patient Experience and Professional Participation.

For the primary outcome measure and high-priority secondary outcome measures, the investigators will first evaluate whether the combination of arms 2 and 3 differs from arm 1 in terms of the measures listed in the Outcome Measures section. If this comparison is statistically significant, the investigators will next compare arms 1 vs 2. and then, if also significant, the investigators will compare arms 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 3. For the 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 3 comparisons, we will use a Holm-Bonferroni p-value correction. These comparisons of treatment arms will be performed at the patient level using a mixed effects regression model, including random physician and clinic effects to account for clustering of patients. Control variables include (1) patient baseline order rates (or completion rates depending on the outcome measure) in July-October 2019, (2) patient characteristics (age, gender, comorbidity, insurance plan, zip code), and (3) physician characteristics (gender, race, years practiced, years at UCLA Health). Unless otherwise specified, p-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Behavioral Economics Primary Health Care Health Maintenance Diabetes Colorectal Cancer Screening Cervical Cancer Screening Chlamydia Screening HPV Screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel cluster randomized trial. Groups will be clustered at the clinic level taking into consideration total Clinical FTE, Primary Care network group, and baseline HM completion rates.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Standard Communication Arm

Monthly email communication: Monthly standard communication via email informing physicians of their health maintenance completion rate over the prior three-month period. The email will also include a link to the performance dashboard, a link to a FAQ page that outlines their incentive plan, a link to helpful resources such as care guidelines, key tips from top performers, the quality measure on which they are performing the best, and the two quality measures that they could improve on the most.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Standard communication email

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.

Arm 2: Arm 1 Message + Social Comparison Intervention

Monthly email communication as in Arm 1

Social comparison: In addition to the information given in Arm 1 email messaging, physicians in this arm will receive a list of the names of the top 25 performers from the prior month, and a high performer benchmark. Each physician in this group will receive a personalized message and subject line based on where in the performance distribution they fall (categories: top 25 performers, high performers, nearly high performers, and low performers). Message content will incorporate language utilizing principles of social comparison theory.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard communication email

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.

Social comparison Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The social comparison is added onto the standard communication email to provide some peer comparison between the physicians.

Arm 3: Arm 2 Interventions + Leadership training

Monthly email communication as in Arm 1 and Arm 2.

Social comparison as in Arm 2.

Quality improvement leadership training: Physician leads and clinic managers within clinics randomized to Group 3 will receive an in-person quality improvement and primary care clinic performance training, using the principles of quality improvement, self-determination theory and social comparison. Clinic leaders will be trained on how to guide these conversations, formulate their own performance/quality improvement goals, design effective strategies to reach these goals, and track their clinic's progress. Check-in emails and calls will be provided on a monthly basis to follow up on clinic-based quality improvement efforts and share key take-aways from the new Primary Care Clinical Excellence Recognition Program. This program aims to support a positive and collaborative culture of clinical excellence by recognizing and sharing best practices from high performing physicians and clinical teams.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard communication email

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.

Social comparison Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The social comparison is added onto the standard communication email to provide some peer comparison between the physicians.

Leadership Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Clinic and Physician leads will be provided with a clinic leadership training seminars in leadership, quality improvement, and support from the Quality Improvement team at UCLA Health.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard communication email

This is the base communication that all physicians will receive.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Social comparison Intervention

The social comparison is added onto the standard communication email to provide some peer comparison between the physicians.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Leadership Training

Clinic and Physician leads will be provided with a clinic leadership training seminars in leadership, quality improvement, and support from the Quality Improvement team at UCLA Health.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary care physicians within the UCLA Health Department of Medicine Primary Care Network and with the following specialties: Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, or Family Medicine.
* Clinical full-time employee level (FTE) of ≥ 40% at the beginning of the intervention period.
* Eligible to receive performance-based financial incentive as determined by the Department of Medicine.
* Panel size \>50 patients before the first intervention email was sent
* Patients, with at least one Health Maintenance topic open before or during at least one visit that takes place with a physician enrolled in the study between November 5, 2019 and March 3, 2020.

Exclusion Criteria

* Not a primary care physician within the UCLA Health Department of Medicine Primary Care Network.
* Not a primary care physician with the following specialties: Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, or Family Medicine.
* Clinical FTE \< 40%.
* Not eligible to receive performance-based financial incentive as determined by the Department of Medicine.
* Panel size greater than 50 patients before the first intervention email was sent.
* Patients that are not seen by a provider enrolled in the study period.
* Patients seen by physician in the study with no Health Maintenance topics open before or during any visit that takes place between November 5, 2019 and March 3, 2020.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daniel M. Croymans, MD, MBA, MS

Primary Care Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCLA Health Department of Medicine, Quality Office

Brentwood, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12345

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Feasibility of Care Coordination
NCT04171596 COMPLETED NA
Transforming Primary Care Payment in Hawaii
NCT02731716 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Primary Care Transition Study
NCT01750892 COMPLETED NA