A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of RMT Medical Technology's SafeFlo® Vena Cava Filter

NCT ID: NCT00654979

Last Updated: 2013-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

117 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-07-31

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the safety and effectiveness of the SafeFlo filter for permanent protection against pulmonary emboli. All patients will be selected to receive the filter according to the stated inclusion / exclusion criteria after consultation between the attending physician and interventional radiologist. Patients with a permanent implantation will be followed for up to 6 months. Clinical success will be defined as no occurrences of any of the following events: recurrent pulmonary embolism, IVC occlusion or filter embolization. The proportion of permanent filter patients considered to be a clinical success will be the primary efficacy parameter.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Embolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single arm

SafeFlo IVC Filter

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SafeFlo IVC Filter

Intervention Type DEVICE

SafeFlo IVC Filter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SafeFlo IVC Filter

SafeFlo IVC Filter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Traditional indications for vena cava filter in patients with established DVT or PE, including (40):

* Patients with proven Pulmonary Embolus (PE) or Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and one or more of the following:

1. Contraindication to anticoagulation
2. Complication of anticoagulation
3. Failure of anticoagulation

* Recurrent PE despite adequate anticoagulation therapy
* Inability to achieve adequate anticoagulation
4. Poor compliance with anticoagulation medications
* Extended indications for vena cava filter placement in patients with established DVT or PE, including the following (31, 40):

* Large free-floating thrombus in the iliac vein or IVC;
* Following massive PE in which recurrent emboli may prove fatal;
* During/after surgical or transcatheter embolectomy;
* Filter placement in high-risk trauma and orthopedic patients:
* High risk trauma or orthopedic patients who cannot receive anticoagulation because of increased bleeding risk, and have one or more of the following injury patterns (31, 40):

1. Severe closed head injury (GCS \< 8);
2. Incomplete spinal cord injury with para or quadriplegia;
3. Complex pelvic fractures with associated long-bone fractures;
4. Multiple long bone fractures.
* Patients undergoing long-term immobilization (e.g., ICU or Surgical oncology)

Exclusion Criteria

* All patients under 18 years of age.
* All patients undergoing emergency procedures.
* All patients with abnormal IVC anatomy or pathology of the IVC such as thrombosis or tumor which prevent safe filter implantation.
* All patients with an IVC diameter which precludes oversizing of the filter platform.
* All patients with active infection / bacteremia.
* All patients with sensitivity to contrast media.
* Uncorrectable severe coagulopathy (e.g., patients with liver or multisystem failure).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

RMT Medical Technologies, Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jacob Cynamon, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montefiore Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Holy Name Hospital

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mt. Sinai Hospital

Manhattan, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

University Hospital Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

251 Air Force Hospital

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Rabin Medical Center

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Universitas Hospital

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Queen Margaret Hospital

Dumfermline, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Greece Israel South Africa United Kingdom

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SFF-104

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.