The Effects of Explosive Blast as Compared to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder on Brain Function and Structure

NCT ID: NCT00631436

Last Updated: 2011-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brain injury from explosive blast is a prominent feature of contemporary combat. Although protective armor and effective acute medical intervention allows soldiers to survive blast events, a growing number of veterans will have disability stemming from blast-related neural damage. Soldiers also return from combat with psychological disabilities caused by traumatic war events. The clinical presentation of individuals with blast-related neural damage and post-traumatic psychopathology are markedly similar and thus a clear description of the direct consequences of explosive blast is complicated by the emotional and cognitive sequelae of psychological trauma. We will use sophisticated measures of neural function and structure to characterize brain injury from explosive blasts in a sample of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) National Guard soldiers who returned from deployment in the fall of 2007. Survey data gathered near the end of deployment indicated that over 50% of the brigade had been exposed to direct physical effects of explosive blasts. To fully characterize the effects of blast on the brain and differentiate them from post-traumatic stress disorder, we will contrast groups of soldiers exposed to blast and with groups experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder. This investigation will improve the characterization of blast-related traumatic brain injury, describe the essential features of the condition in terms of neural function and structure to inform diagnosis, and characterize mechanisms of recovery after blast-related neural injury to allow the creation of interventions that return soldiers to maximum levels of functioning.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The clinical presentation of individuals with blast-related brain injury and post-traumatic stress reactions can be markedly similar and thus a clear description of the direct consequences of explosive blast is complicated by the emotional and cognitive sequelae of psychological trauma. The inability to clearly separate the basis of symptoms for the two conditions has hampered clinicians in prescribing effective treatments that return soldiers to maximal functioning. Measures that directly assess neural disruption may be employed to differentiate blast-related brain injury from post-traumatic psychopathology and guide effective intervention..

Objective/Hypothesis: We propose to use quantitative indices of brain electrical activity and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to characterize the effects of blast injury on brain function and structure. We hypothesize that Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) soldiers injured by explosive blast will be distinguishable from those with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on measures of brain function and structure. Specifically, blast exposure will be associated with diminished P3a amplitudes to target stimuli during sustained attention and diminished lateralized frontal potentials during recognition of previously presented words. Individuals with PTSD will exhibit normal amplitudes of P3 and lateralized frontal brain potentials. Blast affected soldiers will also have compromised white matter integrity in supracallosal, inferior frontal, and superior frontal brain regions while PTSD will not be associated with these structural abnormalities. Finally, functional brain anomalies (e.g., P3a), and frontal white matter fractional anisotropy will be associated with the adaptive functioning of soldiers.

Specific Aims: Using advanced quantitative analyses of electroencephalogram recordings we will determine the nature of functional neural anomalies related to sustained attention and memory deficits evident after injury from blast. We will determine white matter anomalies that are unique to blast injury as compared to PTSD. We will also determine which aspects of blast-related functional and structural brain abnormalities are associated with adaptive functioning in post-deployment. The long-term goals for the proposed program of research are to improve the characterization of traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to blast, describe its essential features in terms of neural function and structure to improve diagnosis, and characterize mechanisms of recovery after blast-related neural injury to facilitate the creation of interventions that target pathophysiology.

Study Design: In May of 2007 over 2650 Minnesota National Guard troops of the 1/34 BCT completed a within-theatre survey on health, exposure to blast, and traumatic events. Fifty-one percent of surveyed troops reported being close enough to an explosive blast that they felt a heat or pressure wave, had trouble hearing, or had subsequent problems with attention or memory. The proposed study will be carried out over a four-year period and include a total of 180 subjects. To determine the neural consequences of blast exposure we will compare the functional and structural brain characteristics of individuals from the 1/34 BCT who have blast injury, blast injury and PTSD, PTSD, and no blast injury or PTSD. There will be 45 demographically similar subjects in each group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blast Injuries Traumatic Brain Injury Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

If the individuals who meet the blast exposure criteria have a PCL score above 50 and meet the Hoge et al PCL criteria, thus indicating likely PTSD, they will be invited to participate as members of the Blast Exposed + PTSD group.

No interventions assigned to this group

2

Other individuals meeting the blast exposure criteria will be invited to participate in the as members of the Blast Exposed + No PTSD group if they have PCL scores below 30.

No interventions assigned to this group

3

Individuals reporting that they were not exposed to explosive blast will be recruited to participate. Those not exposed to blast but with PCL scores over 50 and meeting the Hoge et al PCL criteria will be invited to participate as members of the No Blast + PTSD group.

No interventions assigned to this group

4

Individuals not exposed to blast with PCL scores below 30 will be invited to participate as members of the No Blast + No PTSD group.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A high level of posttraumatic stress will be operationally defined "moderate" levels (a rating of 3 or more on a 1 to 5 scale) of the following symptoms according to Hoge et al 4: one re-experiencing symptom, three avoidance symptoms, and two hyperarousal symptoms. Staff will complete a screening interview via telephone in which the potential participant answers questions from the Blast Exposure Screen. The Blast Exposure Screen provides a comprehensive assessment of exposure to blast for the duration of deployment. Blast events will be rated for physical effects (e.g., knocked off balance, physically thrown by blast) and after effects (i.e., memory problems, headache) on the individual.
* Individuals who report memory lapses,
* Sensitivity to light or noise, headaches
* Difficulty with concentration shortly after the explosive blast and have any of the same symptoms in the past month will be invited to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants will be excluded from the study if they manifest
* Current substance induced psychotic disorder or psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition than TBI
* Current or past DSM IV defined substance dependence other than alcohol, caffeine, or nicotine
* Current DSM IV substance abuse other than alcohol, caffeine, or nicotine
* A neurologic condition or DSM Axis I mental disorder prior to deployment (predeployment data from a sample of soldiers from the 1/34 BCT yielded an estimated rate of 5% of either PTSD or depression)
* Current or predeployment unstable medical condition that would likely affect brain function (e.g., clear anoxic episode, cardiac arrest, current uncontrolled diabetes)
* Significant risk of suicidal or homicidal behavior
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Center for Veterans Research and Education

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Minneapolis VA Medical Center

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott R Sponheim, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minneapolis VA Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Scott R Sponheim, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

612-467-3916

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

JoAnn Tallman

Role: primary

612-467-5279

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDMRP PT074550

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PT074550

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive Training for PTSD
NCT03316196 COMPLETED NA
Vagal Nerve Stimulation in mTBI
NCT04437498 RECRUITING NA