Continuing Lamivudine vs Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Detectable HBV DNA

NCT ID: NCT00625560

Last Updated: 2012-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-02-29

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, open-labelled, prospective 96-week study comparing the antiviral efficacy and safety of switching to entecavir 1 mg QD from lamivudine versus maintaining lamivudine 100 mg QD treatment in HBV-infected subjects currently receiving lamivudine monotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Entecavir has a higher potent antiviral efficacy and a lower drug resistance rate than Lamivudine in nucleoside-naïve CHB patients. The prompt switch from Lamivudine to Entecavir in patients who have insufficient hepatitis B virus suppression (HBV DNA ≥ 60 IU/mL by PCR) may lead to full viral suppression to undetectable level by PCR method. The prompt switch from Lamivudine to Entecavir in patients who have insufficient hepatitis B virus suppression (HBV DNA ≥ 60 IU/mL) may preclude development of drug resistance. The results of this study will provide a rationale for switch treatment from one antiviral to another one, especially from LAM to ETV.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis B, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

entecavir 1.0 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Entecavir

Intervention Type DRUG

entecavir 1.0 mg QD

B

lamivudine 100 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lamivudine

Intervention Type DRUG

lamivudine 100 mg QD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Entecavir

entecavir 1.0 mg QD

Intervention Type DRUG

Lamivudine

lamivudine 100 mg QD

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Baraclude 1.0mg Zeffix 100mg

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult subjects (18-70 years of age) currently taking lamivudine monotherapy for chronic HBV infection for at least 6 months with ≥ HBV DNA 60 IU/mL level and HBeAg positive at baseline.

Exclusion Criteria

* All subjects will be tested for presence of M204V/I mutations in the YMDD motif at baseline. Subjects with M204V/I mutations in the YMDD motif at baseline are not eligible for the study.
* Subjects treated with other antiviral drugs (e.g. adefovir) in combination with lamivudine are not eligible for this study.
* Subjects should have ALT \< 10 x ULN, and no evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma.
* Subjects should be without serological evidence of co-infection with HCV, HIV, or HDV.
* Subjects with decompensated liver disease, as well as pregnant or breast-feeding women, will not be eligible for the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pusan National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sang Hoon Ahn

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sang Hoon Ahn, M.D.Ph.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Yonsei Univsersity College of Medicine

Do Young Kim, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Yonsei University

Jun Yong Park, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yonsei University

Jeong Heo, M.D.Ph.D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pusan National University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pusan National University School of Medicine

Busan, Busan, South Korea

Site Status

Severance Hospital

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2007-0351

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.