Comparison of Prophylactic Antiviral Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Entecavir Versus Lamivudine

NCT ID: NCT01580202

Last Updated: 2017-06-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with chronic hepatitis B who are undergoing anticancer chemotherapy are at risk of HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare. Lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis has been recommended in such circumstance according to the practice guidelines despite of limited evidence. However, failure of LAM prophylaxis including virologic breakthrough and withdrawal hepatitis occurs occasionally, which may lead to liver-related morbidity and mortality as well as premature interruption or a delay of chemotherapy. Given relatively frequent drug resistance of LAM, studies on the proper prophylactic antiviral regimen is warranted. The present multicenter, prospective, randomized study aims to compare the effect of entecavir (ETV) versus LAM for the prevention of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with hematologic and oncologic malignancy undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers who are undergoing anticancer chemotherapy are at risk of HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare, and lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis is recommended according to the practice guidelines despite of limited evidence. However, failure of LAM prophylaxis defined as virologic breakthrough during LAM therapy and withdrawal hepatitis after discontinuation of LAM therapy occurs occasionally, which may lead to liver-related morbidity and mortality as well as premature interruption or a delay of chemotherapy. Considering that LAM therapy showed relatively higher rates of drug resistance and of withdrawal hepatitis, studies on the better choice of prophylactic antiviral regimen is warranted.

The purpose of our study is to conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized study comparing the effect of entecavir (ETV) versus LAM for the prevention of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with hematologic and oncologic malignancy undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy.

A total one hundred eighty HBV carriers with malignancy undergoing chemotherapy will be randomly assigned to each prophylactic therapy arm of ETV and LAM group. The primary endpoint of the study is the HBV reactivation rate during antiviral therapy and 6 months after discontinuation of prophylactic antiviral therapy.

If the prophylactic efficacy of ETV is superior to that of LAM, ETV will be the preferred prophylactic therapy for HBsAg-positive cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignancy Hepatitis B

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lamivudine

LAM (100 mg/day) will be started within 1 week prior to initiation of the 1st cycle of chemotherapy, and continued until 24 weeks after completion of the last chemotherapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lamivudine

Intervention Type DRUG

lamivudine 100mg daily per os

Entecavir

ETV (0.5 mg/day) will be started within 1 week prior to initiation of the 1st cycle of chemotherapy, and continued until 24 weeks after completion of the last chemotherapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Entecavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Entecavir 0.5mg daily per os

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Entecavir

Entecavir 0.5mg daily per os

Intervention Type DRUG

Lamivudine

lamivudine 100mg daily per os

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* positive for HBsAg for at least 6 months
* inactive or active carrier of HBV with ALT level \<2xULN, chronic hepatitis and compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A)
* malignant tumors: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy; solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy (including adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy)

Exclusion Criteria

* positive for anti-HCV or anti-HIV antibodies
* decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma
* expected survival of less than 1 year
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sook-Hyang Jeong

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sook-Hyang Jeong, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cancer Center, Korea

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Soon Chun Hyang University Bucheon Hospital

Bucheon-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Boramae Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AI463-246

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.