A Korean Cohort Study of TDF Rescue Therapy for Difficult-to-treat CHB Patients: a Comparison Between TDF Monotherapy and TDF-based Combination Therapy

NCT ID: NCT02019966

Last Updated: 2018-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1020 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-12

Study Completion Date

2017-08-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Antiviral resistance remains an important issue for long-term NA therapy. For lamivudine (LAM), the rtM204V/I and rtL180M mutations occur in more than 70% after 5 years of therapy. In Korea, primarily owing to limited subsidization policy in the health insurance system, many patients with LMV-resistance had been treated with either rescue ADV or ETV 1.0 mg monotherapy, ultimately leading to the higher prevalence of MDR strain. For those patients, rescue therapies of combining ADV with either ETV or LAM had been tried, but frequently with suboptimal responses. Rescue TDF monotherapy or TDF-based combination therapy are available in Korea for patients who had "difficult-to-treat" antiviral resistance owing to prior treatment failures. However, which is the better has not been evaluated yet. A long-term efficacy and safety of TDF-based rescue therapies in real practice for those patients should be necessary to revise the Korean guideline for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in near future.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

The Difficult-to-treat Chronic Hepatitis B

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TDF monotherapy

TDF monotherapy - treated by tenofovir alone

patients with CHB receiving rescue TDF (300mg once daily) monotherapy

No interventions assigned to this group

TDF-based combination therapy

TDF-based combination therapy - treated by tenofovir based combination therapy.

patients with CHB receiving rescue TDF-based combination therapy (TDF 300mg once daily with any other nucleoside analogue such as lamivudine 100mg, telbivudine 600mg, or entecavir 1.0 mg once daily).

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* more than 20 years old adults
* chronic hepatitis B
* the patients treated by tenofovir alone or tenofovir based combination therapy because of the previous treatment failure
* the patients who agree and singed on the consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* co-infected patients with HCV, HDV or HIV
* pregnancy or breast feeding woman or female patients who are planning to be pregnant
* past history with hepatocellular carcinoma
* combined with other liver disease including wilson, alcoholic, NASH, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency liver disease.
* patients with hypersensitivity for drugs
* patients who were enrolled in other clinical study within 60 days
* patients who were eligible for the clinical study according to the investor
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lim YS, Lee TH, Heo NY, Shim JH, Lee HC, Suh DJ. Entecavir plus adefovir combination treatment for chronic hepatitis B patients after failure of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. Antivir Ther. 2012;17(1):53-60. doi: 10.3851/IMP1914.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22267469 (View on PubMed)

van Bommel F, de Man RA, Wedemeyer H, Deterding K, Petersen J, Buggisch P, Erhardt A, Huppe D, Stein K, Trojan J, Sarrazin C, Bocher WO, Spengler U, Wasmuth HE, Reinders JG, Moller B, Rhode P, Feucht HH, Wiedenmann B, Berg T. Long-term efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy for hepatitis B virus-monoinfected patients after failure of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. Hepatology. 2010 Jan;51(1):73-80. doi: 10.1002/hep.23246.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19998272 (View on PubMed)

Tan J, Degertekin B, Wong SN, Husain M, Oberhelman K, Lok AS. Tenofovir monotherapy is effective in hepatitis B patients with antiviral treatment failure to adefovir in the absence of adefovir-resistant mutations. J Hepatol. 2008 Mar;48(3):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.09.020. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18199519 (View on PubMed)

Berg T, Marcellin P, Zoulim F, Moller B, Trinh H, Chan S, Suarez E, Lavocat F, Snow-Lampart A, Frederick D, Sorbel J, Borroto-Esoda K, Oldach D, Rousseau F. Tenofovir is effective alone or with emtricitabine in adefovir-treated patients with chronic-hepatitis B virus infection. Gastroenterology. 2010 Oct;139(4):1207-17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.053. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20600025 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2013-0704

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.