Preemptive Analgesia in Children Using Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine

NCT ID: NCT00616577

Last Updated: 2019-04-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Caudal epidural analgesia (caudal block) is used in standard pediatric anesthesia practice. It has been shown to be effective in managing postoperative pain in children undergoing abdominal and infraumbilical surgery (Tobias et al 1994). Furthermore, studies have shown that children receiving caudal blocks have secondary benefits such as lower narcotic and anesthetic requirements, more rapid awakening from general anesthesia, decreased time to discharge home, and fewer pain-related behaviors postoperatively (Conroy et al 1993, Tobias et al 1995, Tobias 1996).

This proposed study involves the use of a caudal block in children undergoing elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy to evaluate the role of preemptive analgesia in pediatric pain management. We hypothesize that by inhibiting peripheral pain receptors with a caudal block before the onset of a painful stimulus, we can decrease central nervous system sensitization and reduce postoperative analgesic requirements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Orchiopexy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group CB

Subjects in this arm will receive caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine after induction of general anesthesia prior to surgical incision.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine

Group CA

Group CA (Caudal After-control group) will receive caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine after completion of surgery but before emergence from anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine

Group LIA

Group LIA (Local Infiltration After-control group) will receive local infiltration of ropivacaine 0.25% up to 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) around the surgery site at the conclusion of surgery but before emergence from anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

local infiltration of ropivacaine 0.25% up to 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) around the surgery site

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine

caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine

local infiltration of ropivacaine 0.25% up to 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) around the surgery site

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 2 years or younger.
* Weight 33 kg or less.
* Scheduled for elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 1, 2 or 3.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age over 2 years.
* Weight over 33 kg.
* Allergy to ropivacaine.
* Usual contraindications to caudal anesthesia (patient refusal, skeletal or spinal cord anomaly, coagulopathy, infection at insertion site, ongoing bacteremia)
Maximum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charles Lee, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

57235

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caudal Versus Rectus Sheath Study
NCT01394523 TERMINATED PHASE2/PHASE3