School-Based Mental Health Services for Urban Children

NCT ID: NCT00612690

Last Updated: 2014-06-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

482 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of school- and home-based mental health services and training modules in supporting learning and behavior in financially disadvantaged children who live in urban areas.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are an estimated 4.5 to 6.3 million children with mental disorders in the United States. Emotional and behavioral problems associated with childhood mental disorders have a significant impact, with affected children at an increased risk of reduced quality of life and school dropout. If left untreated, childhood mental disorders may continue into adulthood, often impairing ability to function as an adult. It is believed that, compared to clinic-based services, school- and home-based mental health services may lead to greater improvements in children's learning and behavior at school and home. Especially important to this type of approach is a collaborative effort among parents, teachers, and children to encourage and maintain positive behaviors and academic performance both at home and in the classroom. This study evaluated the effectiveness of school- and home-based mental health services and training modules in supporting learning and behavior in financially disadvantaged children who live in urban areas.

This 3-year study involved parent, child, and teacher participants. During Year 1, teacher participants attended a professional development series that focused on strategies that classroom teachers can use to help children with learning and behavior problems at school. The series involved weekly 30-minute sessions, which were held before and after school hours, for a total of 6 months. Teachers completed a brief survey about the content and structure of sessions at the end of each session and gave a monthly review on how they applied their new strategies in the classroom setting. Teachers continued to attend booster sessions of up to 1 hour each month during Year 2. Teachers also participated in periodic case consultation meetings with parents and mental health providers to further develop ways to improve student participants' learning and behavior.

Child participants received either the community mental health program associated with their school or received general clinic-based services (Treatment as usual). The school component of the mental health program consisted of a classroom environment in which the teachers implemented their newly learned strategies to enhance the academic and behavioral performance of the child participants. Parents of child participants in the community mental health program were invited to attend a series of parent/teacher meetings and home visits where mental health service providers discussed strategies that parents and teachers can use to help improve their children's learning and behavior. Parents completed a brief questionnaire at the end of each meeting and gave a monthly review of how they implemented their new strategies in the home setting. Parents continued to communicate with research staff regarding services provided throughout the study.

Assessments for all participants occurred five times over 3 years. Assessments for parent participants included questions about their child's behavior at school and home, their child's use of mental health services, involvement in their child's schooling, and possible stresses in life. Assessments for teachers included questions about the behavior and academic performances of the child participants, parent involvement with the children's schooling, and stresses in their work environment. A research staff member also conducted a 2-hour classroom observation five times over 3 years. Individual child participants were also observed in the classroom by research staff for three 15-minute intervals five times over the study period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Conduct Disorder Oppositional Defiant Disorder Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Links to Learning

Participants received the community mental health consultation model program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Community mental health consultation model program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.

Services as Usual

Participants received treatment as usual and referrals.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual (TAU)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Community mental health consultation model program

The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Treatment as usual (TAU)

TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Links to Learning (L2L)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Student in kindergarten through 4th grade in a participating school
* Diagnosis of conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as confirmed by parent and/or teacher report
* Parents and teachers of these students were also eligible to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe developmental or medical disability

Note: Teachers, parents, and mental health providers of the children enrolled in the study were also consented as per directions from our Institutional Review Board (IRB) because we were asking about sensitive information. Therefore, the ages listed below are for the children enrolled in the study as this was the determining criteria for study participation. Ages of participating adults (i.e., parents and teachers) were included in Baseline Characteristics to provide a complete description of the study participants. However, although adults participated in the study, the eligibility criteria were based on child characteristics as noted above.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Illinois at Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marc Atkins

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc S. Atkins, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois at Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Illinois at Chicago, Institute for Juvenile Research

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mehta TG, Atkins MS, Frazier SL. The Organizational Health of Urban Elementary Schools: School Health and Teacher Functioning. School Ment Health. 2013 Sep 1;5(3):144-154. doi: 10.1007/s12310-012-9099-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23935763 (View on PubMed)

Neal JW, Neal ZP, Atkins MS, Henry DB, Frazier SL. Channels of change: contrasting network mechanisms in the use of interventions. Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Jun;47(3-4):277-86. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9403-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21181552 (View on PubMed)

Neal, JW, Shernoff, ES, Frazier, S.L, Stachowicz, E, Frangos, U, & Atkins, MS (2008). Change from within: Engaging teacher key opinion leaders in the diffusion of interventions in urban schools. The Community Psychologist, 41:2, 53-57

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Atkins MS, Frazier SL. Expanding the Toolkit or Changing the Paradigm: Are We Ready for a Public Health Approach to Mental Health? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;6(5):483-7. doi: 10.1177/1745691611416996.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26168200 (View on PubMed)

Atkins MS, Hoagwood KE, Kutash K, Seidman E. Toward the integration of education and mental health in schools. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):40-7. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0299-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20309623 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01MH073749

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

DSIR 82-SECHC

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R01MH073749

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caregiver Stress and Sleep Study
NCT05219955 RECRUITING NA