Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
482 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-06-30
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of School-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Preventing Depression in Young Adolescents
NCT00360451
Improving Mental Health Services for Economically Disadvantaged Children: Training Teachers
NCT00069563
Technology to Enhance Treatment for Early Conduct Problems in Low Income Families
NCT02191956
Prevention of Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorders in Preschool Children
NCT00189189
Development of a Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness and Engagement for Youth With Documented Mental Health Disparities
NCT05626231
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This 3-year study involved parent, child, and teacher participants. During Year 1, teacher participants attended a professional development series that focused on strategies that classroom teachers can use to help children with learning and behavior problems at school. The series involved weekly 30-minute sessions, which were held before and after school hours, for a total of 6 months. Teachers completed a brief survey about the content and structure of sessions at the end of each session and gave a monthly review on how they applied their new strategies in the classroom setting. Teachers continued to attend booster sessions of up to 1 hour each month during Year 2. Teachers also participated in periodic case consultation meetings with parents and mental health providers to further develop ways to improve student participants' learning and behavior.
Child participants received either the community mental health program associated with their school or received general clinic-based services (Treatment as usual). The school component of the mental health program consisted of a classroom environment in which the teachers implemented their newly learned strategies to enhance the academic and behavioral performance of the child participants. Parents of child participants in the community mental health program were invited to attend a series of parent/teacher meetings and home visits where mental health service providers discussed strategies that parents and teachers can use to help improve their children's learning and behavior. Parents completed a brief questionnaire at the end of each meeting and gave a monthly review of how they implemented their new strategies in the home setting. Parents continued to communicate with research staff regarding services provided throughout the study.
Assessments for all participants occurred five times over 3 years. Assessments for parent participants included questions about their child's behavior at school and home, their child's use of mental health services, involvement in their child's schooling, and possible stresses in life. Assessments for teachers included questions about the behavior and academic performances of the child participants, parent involvement with the children's schooling, and stresses in their work environment. A research staff member also conducted a 2-hour classroom observation five times over 3 years. Individual child participants were also observed in the classroom by research staff for three 15-minute intervals five times over the study period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Links to Learning
Participants received the community mental health consultation model program.
Community mental health consultation model program
The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
Services as Usual
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals.
Treatment as usual (TAU)
TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Community mental health consultation model program
The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
Treatment as usual (TAU)
TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as confirmed by parent and/or teacher report
* Parents and teachers of these students were also eligible to participate
Exclusion Criteria
Note: Teachers, parents, and mental health providers of the children enrolled in the study were also consented as per directions from our Institutional Review Board (IRB) because we were asking about sensitive information. Therefore, the ages listed below are for the children enrolled in the study as this was the determining criteria for study participation. Ages of participating adults (i.e., parents and teachers) were included in Baseline Characteristics to provide a complete description of the study participants. However, although adults participated in the study, the eligibility criteria were based on child characteristics as noted above.
5 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Atkins
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc S. Atkins, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois at Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois at Chicago, Institute for Juvenile Research
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mehta TG, Atkins MS, Frazier SL. The Organizational Health of Urban Elementary Schools: School Health and Teacher Functioning. School Ment Health. 2013 Sep 1;5(3):144-154. doi: 10.1007/s12310-012-9099-4.
Neal JW, Neal ZP, Atkins MS, Henry DB, Frazier SL. Channels of change: contrasting network mechanisms in the use of interventions. Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Jun;47(3-4):277-86. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9403-0.
Neal, JW, Shernoff, ES, Frazier, S.L, Stachowicz, E, Frangos, U, & Atkins, MS (2008). Change from within: Engaging teacher key opinion leaders in the diffusion of interventions in urban schools. The Community Psychologist, 41:2, 53-57
Atkins MS, Frazier SL. Expanding the Toolkit or Changing the Paradigm: Are We Ready for a Public Health Approach to Mental Health? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;6(5):483-7. doi: 10.1177/1745691611416996.
Atkins MS, Hoagwood KE, Kutash K, Seidman E. Toward the integration of education and mental health in schools. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):40-7. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0299-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.