Trial Outcomes & Findings for School-Based Mental Health Services for Urban Children (NCT NCT00612690)
NCT ID: NCT00612690
Last Updated: 2014-06-04
Results Overview
This rating scale was completed by parents to assess how frequently their child engaged in a range of disruptive, prosocial, and academic behaviors (0 = Never to 2 = Very Often). Normative data are provided by age and sex and the measure was standardized on a heterogeneous population of which one third were urban and 28% were minorities. The scale score, Social Skills, was the primary outcome measure. Scores are rated on a scale of 0 (Never) to 2 (Very Often). The scale score, Social Skills, containing 38 items, was the primary outcome measure. Scores range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating improved social skills.
COMPLETED
NA
482 participants
Measured at pre- and post-school year for 3 years
2014-06-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Links to Learning
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program.
Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
|
Services as Usual
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals.
Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
275
|
207
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
160
|
89
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
115
|
118
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Links to Learning
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program.
Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
|
Services as Usual
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals.
Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
72
|
98
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
32
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Site
|
11
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
School-Based Mental Health Services for Urban Children
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Links to Learning
n=289 Participants
Mental health intervention focused on enhancing the predictors of young children's school success
|
Services As Usual
n=193 Participants
Referral to nearby community mental heath agencies for clinic-based services where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
|
Total
n=482 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
171 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
311 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
Students
|
7.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.81 • n=5 Participants
|
7.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53 • n=7 Participants
|
7.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
Teachers
|
41.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46 • n=5 Participants
|
35.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46 • n=7 Participants
|
38.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.73 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
Service Providers
|
32.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73 • n=5 Participants
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=7 Participants
|
32.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
Parents
|
32.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.92 • n=5 Participants
|
32.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.44 • n=7 Participants
|
32.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.10 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Students: Male
|
74 participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 participants
n=7 Participants
|
124 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Students: Female
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Teachers: Male
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Teachers: Female
|
62 participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 participants
n=7 Participants
|
120 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Service Provders: Male
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
NA participants
n=7 Participants
|
NA participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Service Providers: Female
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
NA participants
n=7 Participants
|
NA participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents: Male
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents: Female
|
96 participants
n=5 Participants
|
55 participants
n=7 Participants
|
151 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
201 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
130 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
331 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
289 participants
n=5 Participants
|
193 participants
n=7 Participants
|
482 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at pre- and post-school year for 3 yearsPopulation: Child participants with available data were included.
This rating scale was completed by parents to assess how frequently their child engaged in a range of disruptive, prosocial, and academic behaviors (0 = Never to 2 = Very Often). Normative data are provided by age and sex and the measure was standardized on a heterogeneous population of which one third were urban and 28% were minorities. The scale score, Social Skills, was the primary outcome measure. Scores are rated on a scale of 0 (Never) to 2 (Very Often). The scale score, Social Skills, containing 38 items, was the primary outcome measure. Scores range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating improved social skills.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Links to Learning
n=104 Participants
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program.
Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
|
Services as Usual
n=67 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals.
Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Baseline
|
46.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.97
|
43.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.98
|
|
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Spring Year 1
|
45.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.65
|
41.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.79
|
|
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Fall Year 2
|
47.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.13
|
42.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.45
|
|
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Spring Year 2
|
47.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.24
|
44.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.64
|
|
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Fall Year 3
|
46.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.03
|
38.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.70
|
|
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Spring Year 3
|
48.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.61
|
40.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at pre- and post-school year for 3 yearsPopulation: Only children with available data were included in the analyses.
The ACES is a teacher rating scale that describes a set of behaviors and attitudes measuring teachers' perceptions of student's academic competence and performance. The scale consists of 30 items rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Never, 2 = Seldom, 3 = Sometimes, 4 = Often, 5 = Almost Always). The total score was reported as a mean per item with higher scores indicating better academic competence. Scores could range from 1 to 30.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Links to Learning
n=100 Participants
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program.
Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
|
Services as Usual
n=65 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals.
Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Baseline
|
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .83
|
2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .77
|
|
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Spring Year 1
|
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .73
|
2.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .76
|
|
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Fall Year 2
|
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .78
|
2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .86
|
|
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Spring Year 2
|
2.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .94
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .76
|
|
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Fall Year 3
|
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .84
|
2.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Spring Year 3
|
2.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .81
|
2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .79
|
Adverse Events
Links to Learning
Services as Usual
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Marc S. Atkins, Ph.D.
University of Illinois at Chicago
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place