Trial Outcomes & Findings for School-Based Mental Health Services for Urban Children (NCT NCT00612690)

NCT ID: NCT00612690

Last Updated: 2014-06-04

Results Overview

This rating scale was completed by parents to assess how frequently their child engaged in a range of disruptive, prosocial, and academic behaviors (0 = Never to 2 = Very Often). Normative data are provided by age and sex and the measure was standardized on a heterogeneous population of which one third were urban and 28% were minorities. The scale score, Social Skills, was the primary outcome measure. Scores are rated on a scale of 0 (Never) to 2 (Very Often). The scale score, Social Skills, containing 38 items, was the primary outcome measure. Scores range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating improved social skills.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

482 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Measured at pre- and post-school year for 3 years

Results posted on

2014-06-04

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Links to Learning
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program. Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
Services as Usual
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals. Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
Overall Study
STARTED
275
207
Overall Study
COMPLETED
160
89
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
115
118

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Links to Learning
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program. Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
Services as Usual
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals. Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services, where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
72
98
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
32
20
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Site
11
0

Baseline Characteristics

School-Based Mental Health Services for Urban Children

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Links to Learning
n=289 Participants
Mental health intervention focused on enhancing the predictors of young children's school success
Services As Usual
n=193 Participants
Referral to nearby community mental heath agencies for clinic-based services where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
Total
n=482 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
67 Participants
n=7 Participants
171 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
311 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
Students
7.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.81 • n=5 Participants
7.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53 • n=7 Participants
7.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71 • n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
Teachers
41.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46 • n=5 Participants
35.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46 • n=7 Participants
38.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.73 • n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
Service Providers
32.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73 • n=5 Participants
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=7 Participants
32.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73 • n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
Parents
32.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.92 • n=5 Participants
32.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.44 • n=7 Participants
32.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.10 • n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Students: Male
74 participants
n=5 Participants
50 participants
n=7 Participants
124 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Students: Female
30 participants
n=5 Participants
17 participants
n=7 Participants
47 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Teachers: Male
9 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=7 Participants
16 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Teachers: Female
62 participants
n=5 Participants
58 participants
n=7 Participants
120 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Service Provders: Male
4 participants
n=5 Participants
NA participants
n=7 Participants
NA participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Service Providers: Female
13 participants
n=5 Participants
NA participants
n=7 Participants
NA participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents: Male
1 participants
n=5 Participants
6 participants
n=7 Participants
7 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents: Female
96 participants
n=5 Participants
55 participants
n=7 Participants
151 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
201 Participants
n=5 Participants
130 Participants
n=7 Participants
331 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
289 participants
n=5 Participants
193 participants
n=7 Participants
482 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Measured at pre- and post-school year for 3 years

Population: Child participants with available data were included.

This rating scale was completed by parents to assess how frequently their child engaged in a range of disruptive, prosocial, and academic behaviors (0 = Never to 2 = Very Often). Normative data are provided by age and sex and the measure was standardized on a heterogeneous population of which one third were urban and 28% were minorities. The scale score, Social Skills, was the primary outcome measure. Scores are rated on a scale of 0 (Never) to 2 (Very Often). The scale score, Social Skills, containing 38 items, was the primary outcome measure. Scores range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating improved social skills.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Links to Learning
n=104 Participants
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program. Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
Services as Usual
n=67 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals. Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Baseline
46.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.97
43.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.98
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Spring Year 1
45.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.65
41.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.79
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Fall Year 2
47.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.13
42.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.45
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Spring Year 2
47.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.24
44.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.64
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Fall Year 3
46.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.03
38.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.70
Social Skills Rating System (Parent Report)
Spring Year 3
48.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.61
40.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measured at pre- and post-school year for 3 years

Population: Only children with available data were included in the analyses.

The ACES is a teacher rating scale that describes a set of behaviors and attitudes measuring teachers' perceptions of student's academic competence and performance. The scale consists of 30 items rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Never, 2 = Seldom, 3 = Sometimes, 4 = Often, 5 = Almost Always). The total score was reported as a mean per item with higher scores indicating better academic competence. Scores could range from 1 to 30.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Links to Learning
n=100 Participants
Participants underwent the community mental health consultation model program. Community mental health consultation model program : The community mental health consultation model program included collaboration among community mental health providers and (1) parent advocates to effectively maintain families in a school-based mental health program, (2) classroom teachers to enhance children's academic performance, and (3) peer-identified influential teachers to influence classroom teachers' use of behavior management strategies. This model further focused on the strongest teacher and parent predictors of student learning.
Services as Usual
n=65 Participants
Participants received treatment as usual and referrals. Treatment as usual (TAU) : TAU included referral to community mental health clinic-based services where participants received standard care for mental health-related problems.
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Baseline
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .83
2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .77
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Spring Year 1
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .73
2.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .76
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Fall Year 2
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .78
2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .86
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Spring Year 2
2.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .94
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .76
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Fall Year 3
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .84
2.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
The Academic Competence Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Spring Year 3
2.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .81
2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .79

Adverse Events

Links to Learning

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Services as Usual

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Marc S. Atkins, Ph.D.

University of Illinois at Chicago

Phone: 312-413-1048

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place