Efficacy of Cefepime Continuous Infusion Versus an Intermittent Dosing Regimen

NCT ID: NCT00609375

Last Updated: 2008-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-30

Study Completion Date

2007-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the efficacy of the administration of 7 to 14 days of cefepime in a continuous infusion vs an intermittent (every 8 hours) administration, in adult patients hospitalized in Bogotá with sepsis and bacteremia caused by gram negative bacilli. The outcome was the rate of clinical cure and microbiological cure after 7 and 14 days of initiation of therapy and rates of relapse after 28 days.

Hypothesis: The administration of beta lactams in continuous infusion allows a clinical or microbiological cure greater than the intermittent administration.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Bacteremia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

I

Administration of cefepime in continuous infusion (3 Gr over 24 hours) for at least 7 days and no more than 14 days days at the discretion of the investigator. Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-100 mL over 30 minutes every 8 hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cefepime

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of cefepime in continuous infusion (3 Gr over 24 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator. Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-100 mL over 30 minutes every 8 hours.

II

Administration of cefepime in intermittent infusion (1 Gr over 30 minutes every 8 hours) for at least 7 days and no more than 14 days days at the discretion of the investigator.Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-250 mL over 24 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cefepime

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of cefepime in intermittent infusion (1 Gr over 30 minutes every 8 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator.Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-250 mL over 24 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cefepime

Administration of cefepime in continuous infusion (3 Gr over 24 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator. Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-100 mL over 30 minutes every 8 hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

cefepime

Administration of cefepime in intermittent infusion (1 Gr over 30 minutes every 8 hours) for 7-14 days at the discretion of the investigator.Administration of saline solution 0.9%, 50-250 mL over 24 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

maxipime Maxipime

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with sepsis, severe sepsis o septic shock diagnosis hospitalized in Intensive care Unit.
* Presence or suspect of Gram negative bacilli bacteremia
* To be possible the follow up according to planned visits
* Patients should be venous access to administrate the antibiotic
* Patients, whom the physicians consider cefepime like election treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a high degree of immunosuppression defined by:

* The presence of neutropenia (Neutrophils count less than 500 cells/mL, or Infection with HIV-AIDS with count of less than 50 CD4 cells/mL, or chronic Administration of immunosuppressive drugs (prednisone more than 5 mg/per day, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, etc.)
* Patients with chronic renal failure.
* Pregnant female patients
* Patients in whom to approach the doctor is considered with a high probability of dying in the next 48 hours (e.g. multiorgan system failure with more than 5 organs engaged according to the criteria of MarshalL et al. or shock irreversible.
* Patients with chronic infections as osteomyelitis or have prosthesis that would perpetuate the infection and requiring the administration of antibiotics for an extended time (including Endocarditis). -Patients with mixed infections that include Gram positive microorganisms or fungal infections.
* -Patients who have received in the past 30 days cefepime.
* Patients with presence of a gram negative bacillus resistant to cefepime. -Patients who are not able to identify them a bacillus gram negative.
* Patients who they are not able to confirm the antibiotic susceptibility of gram negative bacillus. -Patients with concomitant with antimicrobial activity for Gram negative bacilli (e.g. fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, etc.)
* Patients who have known hypersensitivity to B lactams or cefepime
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Asociacion Colombiana de Infectologia, ACIN. Infectious Diseases Society of Colombia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Simon Bolivar, Bogota

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Clinica Palermo, Bogota

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Santa Clara, Bogota

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundación San Carlos, Bogota

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital san Juan de Dios, Antioquia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital san Jorge, Pereira

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Javeriana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Medicine School, Pontificia Universidad javeriana

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

carlos A Alvarez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Alvaro Ruiz, MD; MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Fabian GIL, Msc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital San Juan de Dios

Rionegro, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Clinica Palermo

Bogotá, DC, Colombia

Site Status

Fundacion San Carlos

Bogotá, DC, Colombia

Site Status

Hospital Santa Clara

Bogotá, DC, Colombia

Site Status

Hospital Simon Bolivar

Bogotá, DC, Colombia

Site Status

Hospital Universitario san Ignacio

Bogotá, DC, Colombia

Site Status

Hospital San Jorge

Pareira, Risaralda Department, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Universidad Javeriana

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.