Piperacillin-tazobactam and Temocillin as Carbapenem-alternatives for the Treatment of Severe Infections Due to Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-Producing Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae in the Intensive Care Unit

NCT ID: NCT05565222

Last Updated: 2023-04-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-11

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are a major public health concern, in particular in the intensive care unit (ICU), due to the increase in their incidence. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice of these infections, but their increased use may select for carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacilli, which currently represents the greatest threat in terms of antibiotic resistance. Several retrospective studies have shown that the use of non-carbapenem antibiotics (mainly the association of piperacillin/tazobactam, but also cefepime and temocillin) may be safe alternatives to carbapenems to treat these pathogens when the strain is susceptible to the corresponding antibiotic. However, one recent randomized controlled study, the Merino trial, failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of piperacillin/tazobactam, as compared to meropenem, in patients with Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia resistant to third generation cephalosporins (mainly ESBL producers). However, the patients included in that study were not ICU patients, dosing and modalities of piperacillin/tazobactam administration were not optimal (30-min infusion whereas 4-hours infusion may be associated with better outcome), and cause of death of patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm were not due to antimicrobial treatment failure (mostly death due to care withdrawal in cancer patients). Recently, a retrospective bicenter study performed in ICU patients showed that outcome of patients with severe infection (i.e. sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definition) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to non-carbapenem agents treated with a non-carbapenem agent was similar to that of patients treated with carbapenems.

Given the scarcity of data in ICU patients, the disputable results of the Merino trial, we will therefore conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of non-carbapenem beta-lactam (piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin) treatment vs. meropenem treatment for ESBL-producing Enterobaceriaceae severe infection in ICU patients. Our hypothesis is that a non-carbapenem beta-lactam treatment is non-inferior to carbapenem treatment in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae severe infection in the ICU.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin

Piperacillin/tazobactam, 4.5 g by intravenous route every 6 hours (adjusted in case of renal failure). Piperacillin/tazobactam will be infused over 4 hours. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection Temocillin, 6g/24 hours infused continuously by intravenous route after 2 g loading dose (adjusted in case of renal failure). Temocillin will be infused continuously. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin

Intervention Type DRUG

Piperacillin/tazobactam : 4.5 g by intravenous route every 6 hours (adjusted in case of renal failure).

Temocillin : 6g/24 hours infused continuously by intravenous route after 2 g loading dose (adjusted in case of renal failure)

Meropenem

2 g every 8 hours by intravenous route (adjusted in case of renal failure). Meropenem will be infused over 2 hours. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Meropenem

Intervention Type DRUG

2 g every 8 hours by intravenous route (adjusted in case of renal failure)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin

Piperacillin/tazobactam : 4.5 g by intravenous route every 6 hours (adjusted in case of renal failure).

Temocillin : 6g/24 hours infused continuously by intravenous route after 2 g loading dose (adjusted in case of renal failure)

Intervention Type DRUG

Meropenem

2 g every 8 hours by intravenous route (adjusted in case of renal failure)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients ≥ 18-year-old
* Hospitalized in the ICU
* Severe infection, eg sepsis or septic shock (according to the Sepsis-3 definition) Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, characterized by an increase of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 points or more. This increase in 2 points will be calculated the day infection is diagnosed (day of positive culture serving as reference for the infection) as compared to the day before infection onset.

Septic shock is defined as sepsis and persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg and having a serum lactate level \>2 mmol/l despite adequate volume resuscitation.

This criterion (sepsis or septic shock) has to be fulfilled within a time frame of +/- 24 hours from the day of infection diagnosis (i.e. the day of positive bacteriological sample).

* Pathogen responsible for infection is an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to meropenem and either to piperacillin/tazobactam (minimum inhibitory concentration \<8 mg/L) or to temocillin (minimum inhibitory concentration ≤8 mg/L)

Exclusion Criteria

* Affiliation to social security (AME excluded)


* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Known allergy to beta-lactam
* Patient with severe neutropenia, as defined by absolute neutrophil count \<0.5x109/L
* Infection requiring prolonged antimicrobial treatment (endocarditis; mediastinitis; osteomyelitis/septic arthritis; undrainable/undrained abscess; unremovable/unremoved prosthetic-associated infection)
* Moribund, defined by a SAPS II score at inclusion \>75
* Decision of withholding/withdrawing care
* Patient with concomitant infection requiring antibiotics with activity against Gram-negative bacilli, including patient with polymicrobial infection with pathogen resistant to study drugs
* Participation in another interventional study evaluating drugs or being in the exclusion period at the end of a previous study evaluating drugs .
* Hypersensitivity to any components of the formulations
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

LUYT Charles -Edouard

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

MAYAUX Julien

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

LUYT Charles -Edouard, MD

Role: primary

0142163824

MAYAUX Julien, MD

Role: primary

0142167756

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

APHP211034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.