Clinical Testing of New MR Pulse Sequences

NCT ID: NCT00590252

Last Updated: 2012-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-07-31

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To test and validate newly developed magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences for their ability to enhance the collection of morphological, biomedical, and functional information from the human body. To test clinical protocols on the various MR systems available at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Magnetic resonance (MR) scanners use computer software, called pulse sequences, to extract different types of information from the human body. Though MR has largely matured to become a routine clinical imaging modality, substantial development is still underway in order to fully exploit the technology. BWH Radiology has been a leader in pulse sequence development and the protocol under review has played a large part in this development over the last several years.

The importance of further development in MR cannot be understated. In particular, biochemical information, detailed properties of water diffusion and perfusion in tissue, cardiac imaging, and high-resolution brain imaging, all hold great potential for improving medical diagnosis and monitoring.

MR pulse sequence software is typically developed in small incremental steps. For example, an investigator may receive a new state of the art sequence from the manufacturer of the scanner equipment. (S)he may then decide to add flow-sensitizing gradients. This process is not straightforward, but requires extensive testing, first in phantoms and then in-vivo, to determine if the pulse sequence is capable of performing the new task and, moreover, to see if the new feature does not introduce undesired artifacts.

Some modifications, like the introduction diffusion-sensitizing gradients, must be tested in patients, since changes of tissue diffusion can only be observed in stroke victims. Once the researcher attained the first goal, (s)he may proceed with other modifications, e.g., modifications which will improve the temporal resolution. The completion of a new sequence, which ultimately may be used in a large normal subject or patient study, may involve a large number of design steps, where each step must be tested in one or a few subjects before development proceeds. Another scenario is the application of an existing patient protocol to different, existing, and FDA approved equipment. For example the need may arise to use a different radiofrequency coil (surface coil instead of head coil) or a scanner system with different magnetic field strength (3.0 Tesla instead of 1.5 Tesla). Several parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio, or T1 and T2 weighting may change under such circumstances. In most cases only a study in a subject will reveal if protocol parameter settings are adequate. Therefore, this protocol is different from a conventional study, where exactly the same protocol will be applied to each of a large number of subjects. However, the protocol and the general procedures of data handling used during the different scans is similar enough, so it can be summarized into a general development protocol.

The purpose of this protocol is to test and validate newly developed MR pulse sequences.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

The Focus of This Study Are New Pulse Sequences.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Scheduled for an MRI

Clinically Indicated Adults

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy volunteers
* Patients undergoing clinical indicated MRI

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with contraindication for MRI
* Pregnant women will be excluded from this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Frank John Rybicki, MD, PhD

Director, Cardiac CT and Vascular CT and MRI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frank J Rybicki, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Frank J Rybicki, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

617-732-7206

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Frank J Rybicki, MD, PhD

Role: primary

617-732-7206

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, Hung YP, Rybicki FJ, Maier SE, Tempany CM. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jun;24(5):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.008. Epub 2006 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16735177 (View on PubMed)

Ersoy H, Goldhaber SZ, Cai T, Luu T, Rosebrook J, Mulkern R, Rybicki F. Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1246-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0901.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17449767 (View on PubMed)

McDannold N, Barnes AS, Rybicki FJ, Oshio K, Chen NK, Hynynen K, Mulkern RV. Temperature mapping considerations in the breast with line scan echo planar spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1117-23. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21322.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18046702 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2001-P-000545

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NMR Scanning on Patients
NCT00001194 COMPLETED
Ultrahigh Field Body MR Imaging
NCT02236143 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Use of PET/MR Imaging in Chronic Pain
NCT03195270 COMPLETED PHASE1