Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-12-31
2008-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Secondary Bypass Banding for Weight Regain or Weight Loss Failure After Lap. Gastric Bypass
NCT01078194
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass vs LAP-BAND for Treatment of Morbid Obesity
NCT00247377
Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Banded-versus-Standard Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT01504685
Banded Versus Non-banded Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass
NCT02545647
Gastric Banding After Failed Gastric Bypass
NCT02528565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is an increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy among obese patients compared with subjects with normal body mass index.2,3 Optimal laryngeal view during laryngoscopy can be facilitated with proper head and neck positioning, including slight elevation of the head, neck flexion relative to the chest, and extreme atlanto-occipital extension.4 The "ramped" position, where the patient's ear is horizontally aligned with their sternal notch, has been found to be superior to the standard "sniffing" position, 7-cm occiput elevation, during direct laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients.4
Additionally, there are increased difficulties and risks for tracheal intubation in obese patients versus normal-weight patients. Studies have found that chances for a successful first attempt at oral intubation decrease as patient weight increases.6,7 Improving visualization of laryngeal structures will increase the likelihood of successful tracheal intubation, as increasing the percentage of glottic opening is correlated with the number of intubation attempts, as well as the need for rescue intubation devices.8
It is estimated that endotracheal intubation is performed on approximately 8 million patients per year in the United States. Of these endotracheal intubations, approximately 80% are performed by direct laryngoscopy with transoral placement of the endotracheal tube (ET) into the trachea. There is fairly uniform reporting of the incidence of failed intubation in the literature; it occurs in approximately 0.05% or 1:2230 of surgical patients and in approximately 0.13% to 0.35%, or 1:750 to 1:280, of the obstetric patients.9,10 The incidence of unsuspected difficult intubation is estimated to be higher at 3%. One factor that contributes to difficult intubation is poor visualization, and difficult laryngoscopy is highly correlated with poor laryngeal exposure.11
The Rapid Airway Management Positioner (RAMP) is designed to optimize visualization during direct laryngoscopy by placing the patient into the proper head-elevated laryngoscopy position (HELP). In morbidly obese patients, achieving this position is important,12 and requires a great deal of support under the head and shoulders that could not be performed singlehandedly.13 The RAMP is an easy-to-use, quick device, taking an average of 56 seconds to place and inflate.14
The RAMP has great potential in obese patients. Pre-positioning also helps increase the desaturation safety period for morbidly obese patients.15 Rescue ventilation techniques are facilitated by the HELP position, when the head and neck are elevated above the chest and abdomen. The airway is therefore more isolated and easier to work with, and less positive airway pressure is needed when the weight of the abdomen is away from the diaphragm. Currently, placing a patient on top of stacked blankets is common and can create the HELP, or "ramped" position, 5 but also causes variable and unstable results. We suspect that by providing a better laryngeal view, the RAMP may help decrease the incidence of tissue trauma associated with intubation, and intubation may be achieved more quickly in a population that is known to be difficult.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laryngoscopy without RAMP
First, laryngoscopy will be preformed utilizing a traditional Macintosh size 4 blade laryngoscope. The view of the laryngeal aperture will be recorded, and a photo will be taken by the Airway Camâ„¢.
Laryngoscopy without RAMP
Laryngoscopy without RAMP
Laryngoscopy with RAMP
Next, the Rapid Airway Management Positioner (RAMP) will be positioned and inflated underneath the patient so that the patient is placed in the optimal sniffing position. The investigator will again perform laryngoscopy utilizing the same technique and the laryngeal view will be recorded.
Laryngoscopy with RAMP
inflatable positioning ramp
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laryngoscopy with RAMP
inflatable positioning ramp
Laryngoscopy without RAMP
Laryngoscopy without RAMP
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carin A. Hagberg
Professor and Chair - Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carin A. Hagberg,, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HSC-MS-07-0067
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.