Simplified Technique for Performing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

NCT ID: NCT06782256

Last Updated: 2025-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-09

Study Completion Date

2011-03-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will include all eligible patients who have undergone or who will undergo a laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure at Madigan Army Medical Center using a specific surgical technique developed by the Principal Investigator. Traditionally, our surgeons have used a standardized technique that included use of a circular stapler to perform the anastomosis of the stomach pouch to the small bowel. The Principal Investigator developed a new technique with multiple modifications of the previous technique, including use of a totally linear stapled anastomosis. These techniques will be labeled OLD and NEW for the remainder of this document. The NEW technique was first utilized in May 2008 and has now been widely adopted by the majority of bariatric surgeons at Madigan Army Medical Center. This study will include both a retrospective review of all patients who have undergone this procedure, as well as a prospective observational study of all future patients undergoing this procedure. At this time, approximately 75 patients have undergone this procedure and will all be included in the retrospective review. The investigators estimate that 150 to 200 of these procedures will be performed at Madigan per year over the next 2 years, and will be included in the prospective observational arm of the study. The investigators anticipate a total sample number of 400 patients if the investigators collect data for the next two years.

Hypothesis: The NEW technique of gastric bypass allows for safe and rapid performance of a laparoscopic gastric bypass. The NEW technique will result in shorter operative times compared to the OLD technique, and no significant difference in postoperative complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The methods of the retrospective arm of the study will involve abstracting of key variables of interest from review of each patient's electronic medical record, including the inpatient electronic record at the time of surgery and any subsequent readmission, and all outpatient visits identified on AHLTA. The key outcome variables of interest will be the early and late complication profile of this procedure, the impact on weight loss and control of weight-related comorbidities, the operative time required for the procedure, and the operative difficulty of the procedure as assessed by intraoperative complications and blood loss. All data will be abstracted to a standardized spreadsheet maintained by the PI, and a full listing of the study variables is attached. The prospective arm of the study will involve collection of the same data in a prospective manner, with the addition of direct conversations with the operating surgeon and/or resident to clarify any ambiguities in the electronic record.

The data analysis plan will involve simple descriptive statistics for all demographic variables, such as age, body mass index (BMI), gender, etc. Descriptive analysis of outcome data will be performed, including the short and long term complication profile of the NEW operation. Weight loss will be calculated as the percentage of the BMI lost at each time point, and will be analyzed by a paired sample t-test, with significance set at p\<0.05. Operative times will be compared between different staff surgeons and different PGY levels using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc analysis using Bonferroni test and Tamhanes T2. Complications will be compared among these same groups using chi-square analysis. As the operative times and complication profile associated with the previously performed method of gastric bypass (OLD) are known and have been published, the investigators will also compare our outcomes with this new method to our outcomes with the old method using chi-square, student's t-test, and paired t-test to compare each surgeon's operative times with the old technique and the new technique.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Bypass Morbid Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gastric Bypass

Patients who have undergone a laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure at using a specific surgical technique developed by the Principal Investigator

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* scheduled for a laparoscopic gastric bypass

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass using any method other than the totally linear stapled method
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Madigan Army Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sandra Smith

Surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew J. Martin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Madigan Army Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Madigan Army Medical Center

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Menifield CE, Doty N, Fletcher A. Obesity in America. ABNF J. 2008 Summer;19(3):83-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18717205 (View on PubMed)

Drenick EJ, Bale GS, Seltzer F, Johnson DG. Excessive mortality and causes of death in morbidly obese men. JAMA. 1980 Feb 1;243(5):443-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7351764 (View on PubMed)

Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA. 2007 Nov 7;298(17):2028-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.17.2028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17986696 (View on PubMed)

Davis MM, Slish K, Chao C, Cabana MD. National trends in bariatric surgery, 1996-2002. Arch Surg. 2006 Jan;141(1):71-4; discussion 75. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.1.71.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16415414 (View on PubMed)

Kinzl JF, Schrattenecker M, Traweger C, Aigner F, Fiala M, Biebl W. Quality of life in morbidly obese patients after surgical weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007 Feb;17(2):229-35. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9030-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17476877 (View on PubMed)

Perry CD, Hutter MM, Smith DB, Newhouse JP, McNeil BJ. Survival and changes in comorbidities after bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318142cb4b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18156918 (View on PubMed)

NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Dec 15;115(12):956-61.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1952493 (View on PubMed)

Shin RB. Evaluation of the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005 Mar-Apr;1(2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2005.01.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16925221 (View on PubMed)

Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Capella RF, Capella JF, Davis D, Schmidt HJ, Wasielewski A, Davies RJ. The learning curve measured by operating times for laparoscopic and open gastric bypass: roles of surgeon's experience, institutional experience, body mass index and fellowship training. Obes Surg. 2005 Feb;15(2):172-82. doi: 10.1381/0960892053268507.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15810124 (View on PubMed)

Gonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR, Bowers SP, Smith CD. Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg. 2003 Feb;138(2):181-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.2.181.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12578417 (View on PubMed)

Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME, Raskin E, Shore R. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results and learning curve of a high-volume academic program. Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;140(4):362-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.4.362.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15837887 (View on PubMed)

Breaux JA, Kennedy CI, Richardson WS. Advanced laparoscopic skills decrease the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):985-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9203-2. Epub 2007 Feb 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17623252 (View on PubMed)

Hsu GP, Morton JM, Jin L, Safadi BY, Satterwhite TS, Curet MJ. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: differences in outcome between attendings and assistants of different training backgrounds. Obes Surg. 2005 Sep;15(8):1104-10. doi: 10.1381/0960892055002374.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16197780 (View on PubMed)

Martin RC 2nd, Kehdy FJ, Allen JW. Formal training in advanced surgical technologies enhances the surgical residency. Am J Surg. 2005 Aug;190(2):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16023439 (View on PubMed)

Madan AK, Harper JL, Tichansky DS. Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: on-line survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166-72; discussion 172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18069071 (View on PubMed)

Leyba JL, Llopis SN, Isaac J, Aulestia SN, Bravo C, Obregon F. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity-a randomized controlled trial comparing two gastrojejunal anastomosis techniques. JSLS. 2008 Oct-Dec;12(4):385-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19275854 (View on PubMed)

Csendes A, Burgos AM, Burdiles P. Incidence of anastomotic strictures after gastric bypass: a prospective consecutive routine endoscopic study 1 month and 17 months after surgery in 441 patients with morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009 Mar;19(3):269-73. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9625-5. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18696171 (View on PubMed)

Szomstein S, Whipple OC, Zundel N, Cal P, Rosenthal R. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with linear cutter technique: comparison of four-row versus six-row cartridge in creation of anastomosis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Jul-Aug;2(4):431-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.03.019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16925374 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

209085

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.