Simplified Technique for Performing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
NCT ID: NCT06782256
Last Updated: 2025-01-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
140 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-07-09
2011-03-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: The NEW technique of gastric bypass allows for safe and rapid performance of a laparoscopic gastric bypass. The NEW technique will result in shorter operative times compared to the OLD technique, and no significant difference in postoperative complications.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT00667706
Laparoscopic Revision of an Enlarged Gastric Outlet After Gastric Bypass
NCT01116284
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-Y-gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity
NCT00356213
Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes With Different Stapling Devices
NCT02731079
Weight Loss & Comorbidity Resolution With LAGB Alone vs. LAGB With Gastric Plication
NCT01703546
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The data analysis plan will involve simple descriptive statistics for all demographic variables, such as age, body mass index (BMI), gender, etc. Descriptive analysis of outcome data will be performed, including the short and long term complication profile of the NEW operation. Weight loss will be calculated as the percentage of the BMI lost at each time point, and will be analyzed by a paired sample t-test, with significance set at p\<0.05. Operative times will be compared between different staff surgeons and different PGY levels using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc analysis using Bonferroni test and Tamhanes T2. Complications will be compared among these same groups using chi-square analysis. As the operative times and complication profile associated with the previously performed method of gastric bypass (OLD) are known and have been published, the investigators will also compare our outcomes with this new method to our outcomes with the old method using chi-square, student's t-test, and paired t-test to compare each surgeon's operative times with the old technique and the new technique.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gastric Bypass
Patients who have undergone a laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure at using a specific surgical technique developed by the Principal Investigator
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Madigan Army Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sandra Smith
Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew J. Martin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Madigan Army Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Menifield CE, Doty N, Fletcher A. Obesity in America. ABNF J. 2008 Summer;19(3):83-8.
Drenick EJ, Bale GS, Seltzer F, Johnson DG. Excessive mortality and causes of death in morbidly obese men. JAMA. 1980 Feb 1;243(5):443-5.
Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA. 2007 Nov 7;298(17):2028-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.17.2028.
Davis MM, Slish K, Chao C, Cabana MD. National trends in bariatric surgery, 1996-2002. Arch Surg. 2006 Jan;141(1):71-4; discussion 75. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.1.71.
Kinzl JF, Schrattenecker M, Traweger C, Aigner F, Fiala M, Biebl W. Quality of life in morbidly obese patients after surgical weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007 Feb;17(2):229-35. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9030-5.
Perry CD, Hutter MM, Smith DB, Newhouse JP, McNeil BJ. Survival and changes in comorbidities after bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318142cb4b.
NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Dec 15;115(12):956-61.
Shin RB. Evaluation of the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005 Mar-Apr;1(2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2005.01.003.
Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Capella RF, Capella JF, Davis D, Schmidt HJ, Wasielewski A, Davies RJ. The learning curve measured by operating times for laparoscopic and open gastric bypass: roles of surgeon's experience, institutional experience, body mass index and fellowship training. Obes Surg. 2005 Feb;15(2):172-82. doi: 10.1381/0960892053268507.
Gonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR, Bowers SP, Smith CD. Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg. 2003 Feb;138(2):181-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.2.181.
Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME, Raskin E, Shore R. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results and learning curve of a high-volume academic program. Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;140(4):362-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.4.362.
Breaux JA, Kennedy CI, Richardson WS. Advanced laparoscopic skills decrease the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):985-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9203-2. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
Hsu GP, Morton JM, Jin L, Safadi BY, Satterwhite TS, Curet MJ. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: differences in outcome between attendings and assistants of different training backgrounds. Obes Surg. 2005 Sep;15(8):1104-10. doi: 10.1381/0960892055002374.
Martin RC 2nd, Kehdy FJ, Allen JW. Formal training in advanced surgical technologies enhances the surgical residency. Am J Surg. 2005 Aug;190(2):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.020.
Madan AK, Harper JL, Tichansky DS. Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: on-line survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166-72; discussion 172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
Leyba JL, Llopis SN, Isaac J, Aulestia SN, Bravo C, Obregon F. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity-a randomized controlled trial comparing two gastrojejunal anastomosis techniques. JSLS. 2008 Oct-Dec;12(4):385-8.
Csendes A, Burgos AM, Burdiles P. Incidence of anastomotic strictures after gastric bypass: a prospective consecutive routine endoscopic study 1 month and 17 months after surgery in 441 patients with morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009 Mar;19(3):269-73. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9625-5. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
Szomstein S, Whipple OC, Zundel N, Cal P, Rosenthal R. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with linear cutter technique: comparison of four-row versus six-row cartridge in creation of anastomosis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Jul-Aug;2(4):431-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.03.019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
209085
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.