Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass to Micro-laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass

NCT ID: NCT01183273

Last Updated: 2014-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background Laparoscopy is the preferred surgical approach for a number of different diseases as it allows for diagnosis and treatment in the setting of a safe and feasible method offering enhanced cosmesis. The natural evolution of laparoscopy is micro-laparoscopy which utilizes smaller instruments and optics. Technological advancements have enabled miniaturization of the surgical equipment without compromising diagnostic or operative capabilities.

Dr. Keith Zuccala is currently performing micro-laparoscopic gastric bypass with an identical safety profile as traditional laparoscopy (NSQIP data comparison between Dr. Laura Choi and Dr. Keith Zuccala). The current trend in laparoscopy is to minimize incisions and their size to decrease trauma to the abdominal wall.

Study Design Both methods have never been compared in a prospective randomized trial to address the following questions.

1. Is there a difference in outcome?
2. Is there a decrease in postoperative pain?
3. Does it decrease time off from work?
4. Does micro-laparoscopy increase OR time?
5. What is the effect on cost of micro-laparoscopy? Patients will be randomized to one or the other method, disclosing that to the investigators best knowledge both methods are equally safe and that Dr. Zuccala has performed several hundred cases using both methods.

Patient Population Projected sample size would be 50 patients in each group. Accrual should be feasible over the course of 9-12 months.

Data collection (patients will be followed for a total of 30 days for the purpose of this study)

1. NSQIP data to assess outcome
2. Postoperative usage of pain medication while in the hospital
3. Time off from work
4. OR time
5. Direct cost of procedure as it relates to material used

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study compares two groups of patients who have voluntarily chosen to undergo roux-n-y gastric bypass surgery. The groups will be randomized to receive micro-laparoscopic or laparoscopic surgery to be performed by the same surgeon, Dr. Keith Zuccala.

Study Schema

* The patient attends an informational seminar conducted by the Bariatric Surgery Department
* The patient is scheduled for an initial consultation with the bariatric PA/NP where the patient provides: a letter of referral for Bariatric Surgery from primary care doctor or specialty physician; insurance referral; and assurance that health insurance coverage includes Bariatric Surgery.
* Following the initial consultation, the patient is scheduled for the following: comprehensive blood testing; psychological screening/evaluation; dietary evaluation; appointment with the surgeon; pulmonary evaluation (if needed); cardiology evaluation (if needed); gastroenterology evaluation (if needed).
* An appointment for medical clearance with the referring surgeon is scheduled and completed within three weeks of surgery. At this appointment an electrocardiogram (EKG) and repeat blood work will be carried out.
* The patient is deemed to meet all inclusion criteria.
* The patient is advised to follow all pre-operative instructions as advised by the nursing staff and explained in the Danbury Hospital Center for Weight Loss Surgery Guide.
* Surgical procedures performed are standard for those already utilized daily in the surgery department for gastric bypass procedures.
* The patient is closely observed in the hospital and given specific discharge instructions upon leaving the hospital
* The patient is followed for a maximum of 60 days after surgery and asked how many days of work they missed.
* The NSQIP data base and patient medical record are used to assess outcome, postoperative pain, OR time and surgery cost

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Micro-laparoscopic bypass

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Microlaparoscopic gastric bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

microlaparoscopic gastric bypass will be performed using standard of care procedure.

Laparoscopic gastric bypass

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopic gastric bypass will be performed using standard of care procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Microlaparoscopic gastric bypass

microlaparoscopic gastric bypass will be performed using standard of care procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Surgery

laparoscopic gastric bypass will be performed using standard of care procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 with or without co-morbid conditions\*
* A BMI ≥ 35 with co-morbid conditions\*
* Permanent lifestyle changes including exercise
* No significant, untreated psychiatric illnesses
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Sufficient ability and cognition to understand surgery, potential complications and subsequent associated changes
* Willingness to participate in treatment and long-term follow-up
* Proof of failed attempts at non-surgical weight reduction
* Acceptable medical/operative risks \* Co-morbid solutions include: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, asthma, hypoventilation syndrome of obesity, degenerative joint disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, venous stasis ulcers, depression, menstrual irregularities/infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, fungal skin infections.

Exclusion Criteria

* The need to convert from laparoscopic roux-n-y to an open abdominal procedure.
* Patients with congestive heart failure or other serious illness which would prevent the patient from a successful surgery and recovery
* Women who are nursing or pregnant
* Patients who smoke
* Patient's insurance will not cover the cost of surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ethicon Endo-Surgery

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Suzanne J. Rose

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Suzanne J. Rose

Director, Office of Clinical Trials

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre Saldinger, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Danbury Hospital

Keith Saldinger, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Danbury Hospital

Suzanne J House, M.S., Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Danbury Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Danbury Hospital

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

29043

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.