Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass vs LAP-BAND for Treatment of Morbid Obesity
NCT ID: NCT00247377
Last Updated: 2023-04-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
197 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-10-31
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Recently, the laparoscopic approach to GBP was reported. Wittgrove and colleagues reported their results of 75 patients who underwent laparoscopic GBP and demonstrated significant short-term advantages with comparable weight loss and reversal of comorbidities compared to the open approach. However, GBP might it be done laparoscopic or open approach can potentially be associated with significant morbidity and mortality such as anastomotic leak, pulmonary embolism, bowel obstruction, and postoperative stricture.
The FDA recently approved the laparoscopic adjustable banding system (LAP-BAND) for use in the United States in June 2001. The LAP-BAND system is a device designed to induce weight loss in severely obese patients. It is surgically placed around the proximal stomach to create a small proximal stomach pouch and restricted opening, or stoma, through which passage of food will be slowed. An inflatable portion along the inner aspect of the band is connected to an access port, placed intramuscularly. This enabled stoma adjustments to be made without the need for further surgery. The advantages of the LAP-BAND system included no cutting or opening of the stomach wall, ability to adjust the stoma and a technically easier operation to perform than laparoscopic GBP. We wanted to evaluate if the LAP-BAND procedure is as effective as the laparoscopic GBP procedure for treatment of morbid obesity.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single Incision Laparoscopic Gastric Banding Versus Conventional Five Port Laparoscopic Gastric Banding
NCT01039077
Laparoscopic Single Incision -Vs- Multiple Incision Gastric Band Surgery
NCT01844960
Laparoscopic Revision of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Gastric Bypass
NCT01041131
Laparoscopic Revision Gastric Bypass for Inadequate Initial Weight Loss
NCT01040377
LAGB as a Treatment for Morbid Obesity in Adolescents
NCT01045499
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Morbid obesity and its health consequences is increasing in the United States
2. Roux-en-Y GBP is an effective treatment for morbid obesity but can be associated with substantial morbidities
3. LAP-BAND system can be an effective treatment for morbidly obese patients with potentially reduced morbidity compared to laparoscopic GBP
HYPOTHESIS:
1. LAP-BAND can be performed safely and are associated with reduced postoperative pain, decrease in morbidity, decrease ICU and hospital stay, reduced costs, comparable improvement in quality-of-life, and acceptable long-term weight loss compared with laparoscopic GBP
2. LAP-BAND is associated with a decrease in fluid requirement in the perioperative period, improved postoperative pulmonary function, and lower intraabdominal pressure compared to laparoscopic GBP
3. LAP-BAND does not alter esophageal motility and is effective in improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms.
OBJECTIVES AND SPECIFIC AIMS:
1. To determine the short-term outcome, quality-of-life, costs, and long-term weight loss after laparoscopic GBP compared with LAP-BAND.
2. To compare physiologic changes such as perioperative fluid requirement, postoperative pulmonary function, and intraabdominal pressure after laparoscopic GBP and LAP-BAND.
3. To evaluate the effect of LAP-BAND on esophageal motility and its effectiveness in controlling gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GERD) for morbidly obese patients with GERD.
Please note: All physician, hospital, laboratory costs, the barium study tests, and the performance of the operation will be billed to the subject or their insurer as customary since these procedures are standard of care regardless of participation in the study. The research procedures such as the pulmonary function tests, intra-abdominal pressure, body fat composition tests, resting energy expenditure, exercise testing, strength testing, nutritional assessments, and esophageal function tests are considered research-related and will be paid for by the investigator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
Subject undergoes Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
Gastric bypass surgery
in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric bypass surgery was undergone
LAP-BAND
Subject undergoes LAP-BAND procedure
Lap-Band
in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric band surgery was undergone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gastric bypass surgery
in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric bypass surgery was undergone
Lap-Band
in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric band surgery was undergone
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Good health status with acceptable operative risk (good cardiopulmonary function)
3. Willingness to follow protocol requirements: Signing informed consent, follow-up, and completing protocol diagnostic tests
Exclusion Criteria
2. Large abdominal ventral hernia
3. Patients with hiatal hernia
4. Inadequate prior medical management
5. Lack of patient's motivation and contribution to long-term success
6. Unacceptable operative risk
7. Minors and pregnant women are excluded as these patients do not qualify for the bariatric procedures. Minors are not psychologically fit to undergo such surgery and pregnant women are excluded because of safety for the fetus.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Irvine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nihn Tuan Nguyen
Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ninh T Nguyen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Univeristy of California, Irvine, Medical Center
Orange, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nguyen NT, Slone JA, Nguyen XM, Hartman JS, Hoyt DB. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2009 Oct;250(4):631-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b92480.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HS-2002-2394
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.