Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass vs LAP-BAND for Treatment of Morbid Obesity

NCT ID: NCT00247377

Last Updated: 2023-04-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

197 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PURPOSE Obesity is a growing problem in the United States. Severe obesity, known as "morbid obesity", is defined as being 100 pounds in excess of ideal body weight. Nonsurgical treatments for morbid obesity include exercise, dietary restriction, behavior modification, and pharmacological intervention. However, it is estimated that most patients undergoing nonsurgical treatments for weight reduction will regain their weight within 2 to 4 years after treatment. According to the NIH consensus conference in 1991, surgery remains the only effective sustained weight loss treatment for morbid obesity. The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) is currently considered the gold standard bariatric surgical operation. Mean weight loss following GBP is approximately 65% of the excess body weight during the first 12 to 18 months postoperatively. Long-term weight loss is in the range of 55-70% of excess body weight loss.

Recently, the laparoscopic approach to GBP was reported. Wittgrove and colleagues reported their results of 75 patients who underwent laparoscopic GBP and demonstrated significant short-term advantages with comparable weight loss and reversal of comorbidities compared to the open approach. However, GBP might it be done laparoscopic or open approach can potentially be associated with significant morbidity and mortality such as anastomotic leak, pulmonary embolism, bowel obstruction, and postoperative stricture.

The FDA recently approved the laparoscopic adjustable banding system (LAP-BAND) for use in the United States in June 2001. The LAP-BAND system is a device designed to induce weight loss in severely obese patients. It is surgically placed around the proximal stomach to create a small proximal stomach pouch and restricted opening, or stoma, through which passage of food will be slowed. An inflatable portion along the inner aspect of the band is connected to an access port, placed intramuscularly. This enabled stoma adjustments to be made without the need for further surgery. The advantages of the LAP-BAND system included no cutting or opening of the stomach wall, ability to adjust the stoma and a technically easier operation to perform than laparoscopic GBP. We wanted to evaluate if the LAP-BAND procedure is as effective as the laparoscopic GBP procedure for treatment of morbid obesity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

RATIONALE:

1. Morbid obesity and its health consequences is increasing in the United States
2. Roux-en-Y GBP is an effective treatment for morbid obesity but can be associated with substantial morbidities
3. LAP-BAND system can be an effective treatment for morbidly obese patients with potentially reduced morbidity compared to laparoscopic GBP

HYPOTHESIS:

1. LAP-BAND can be performed safely and are associated with reduced postoperative pain, decrease in morbidity, decrease ICU and hospital stay, reduced costs, comparable improvement in quality-of-life, and acceptable long-term weight loss compared with laparoscopic GBP
2. LAP-BAND is associated with a decrease in fluid requirement in the perioperative period, improved postoperative pulmonary function, and lower intraabdominal pressure compared to laparoscopic GBP
3. LAP-BAND does not alter esophageal motility and is effective in improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms.

OBJECTIVES AND SPECIFIC AIMS:

1. To determine the short-term outcome, quality-of-life, costs, and long-term weight loss after laparoscopic GBP compared with LAP-BAND.
2. To compare physiologic changes such as perioperative fluid requirement, postoperative pulmonary function, and intraabdominal pressure after laparoscopic GBP and LAP-BAND.
3. To evaluate the effect of LAP-BAND on esophageal motility and its effectiveness in controlling gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GERD) for morbidly obese patients with GERD.

Please note: All physician, hospital, laboratory costs, the barium study tests, and the performance of the operation will be billed to the subject or their insurer as customary since these procedures are standard of care regardless of participation in the study. The research procedures such as the pulmonary function tests, intra-abdominal pressure, body fat composition tests, resting energy expenditure, exercise testing, strength testing, nutritional assessments, and esophageal function tests are considered research-related and will be paid for by the investigator.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Morbid Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Subject undergoes Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gastric bypass surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric bypass surgery was undergone

LAP-BAND

Subject undergoes LAP-BAND procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lap-Band

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric band surgery was undergone

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gastric bypass surgery

in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric bypass surgery was undergone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lap-Band

in order to meet health requirements for patient, gastric band surgery was undergone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

gastric bypass bypass surgery weight loss surgery weight loss surgery band

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female patients with BMI of 40-60 kg/m2 or 35 kg/m2 with comorbidities
2. Good health status with acceptable operative risk (good cardiopulmonary function)
3. Willingness to follow protocol requirements: Signing informed consent, follow-up, and completing protocol diagnostic tests

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior upper abdominal surgery except cholecystectomy
2. Large abdominal ventral hernia
3. Patients with hiatal hernia
4. Inadequate prior medical management
5. Lack of patient's motivation and contribution to long-term success
6. Unacceptable operative risk
7. Minors and pregnant women are excluded as these patients do not qualify for the bariatric procedures. Minors are not psychologically fit to undergo such surgery and pregnant women are excluded because of safety for the fetus.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Irvine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nihn Tuan Nguyen

Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ninh T Nguyen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univeristy of California, Irvine, Medical Center

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nguyen NT, Slone JA, Nguyen XM, Hartman JS, Hoyt DB. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2009 Oct;250(4):631-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b92480.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19730234 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HS-2002-2394

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.