Minocycline and Perfusion Pressure Augmentation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT00559494

Last Updated: 2013-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

While research in animal models of spinal cord injury have provided many promising insights, human studies have failed to produce effective therapies. We propose to investigate the drug Minocycline (a metalloproteinase inhibitor) for the treatment of spinal cord injured patients aiming to limit neurological injury and improve neurological outcome. This drug influences several secondary injury mechanisms implicated in spinal cord injury and has been effective in improving outcome after spinal cord injury in animal models. We also propose to examine the safety and feasibility of spinal cord perfusion pressure augmentation with a protocol of IV fluids and inotrope medications versus standard maintenance of mean arterial pressure in subjects who exhibit a decrease in perfusion pressure to less than 75 mmHg. The purpose of this pilot study is 1) to evaluate the feasibility of a clinical trial protocol for Minocycline in patients with acute spinal cord injury, and 2) to ensure adequate drug dosing and metabolic effect. After undergoing a process of informed consent, patients agreeing to participate in the study will be randomized to placebo or treatment groups in a double-blind fashion. Clinical neurological examinations, patient-reported quality of life, and functional independence categorization will be combined with serum and cerebrospinal fluid laboratory investigations to establish some of the pharmacological properties and the safety profile of this medication in this group of patients. In addition, patient tolerance to the dosing regimen will be assessed. The results of this study will provide the preliminary data necessary to plan for a larger prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to assess efficacy and to further assess safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minocycline

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Minocycline

Intervention Type DRUG

Minocycline IV BID x 7 days (first 10 patients 200 mg/dose, subsequent patients adjusted based on pharmacodynamic profiling to 800 mg loading dose, tapered 100 mg each dose to 400 mg then maintain at 400mg until day 7)

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline 250cc via central line similar to minocycline arm administration protocol

SCPP augmentation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SCPP augmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

maintenance of spinal cord perfusion pressure at 75 mmHg with fluids and inotrope protocol

SCPP control

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

SCPP control

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

maintenance of Mean arterial pressure of \>65 mmHg with fluids and inotropes protocol without spinal cord perfusion pressure as target or guiding therapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Minocycline

Minocycline IV BID x 7 days (first 10 patients 200 mg/dose, subsequent patients adjusted based on pharmacodynamic profiling to 800 mg loading dose, tapered 100 mg each dose to 400 mg then maintain at 400mg until day 7)

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Normal saline 250cc via central line similar to minocycline arm administration protocol

Intervention Type DRUG

SCPP augmentation

maintenance of spinal cord perfusion pressure at 75 mmHg with fluids and inotrope protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SCPP control

maintenance of Mean arterial pressure of \>65 mmHg with fluids and inotropes protocol without spinal cord perfusion pressure as target or guiding therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Minocin control saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 16 or over
* Motor complete or motor incomplete acute spinal cord injury involving bony spinal levels between C0 and T11
* Patient able to provide informed consent
* Randomization and commencement of administration of first drug dose within 12 hours of injury
* surgical decompression if needed to be performed within 24 hours of the injury
* subjects exhibiting spinal cord perfusion pressure (lumbar drain transduced pressure - mean arterial pressure)\> 75 mmHg will be randomized to active augmentation protocol versus maintenance of mean arterial pressure

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute spinal cord injury \>12 hours old
* Isolated sensory deficit, motor intact
* Isolated cauda equina injury or injury at bony level T12 or below
* History of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
* Pre-existing hepatic or renal disease
* Tetracycline hypersensitivity
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Isolated sensory deficit
* Isolated radicular motor deficit
* Significant leukopenia (white blood cell count \< ½ times the lower limit of normal) at screening
* Elevated liver function tests (AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin \> 2 times the upper limit of normal) at screening
* Presence of systemic disease that might interfere with patient safety, compliance or evaluation of the condition under study (e.g. insulin-dependent diabetes, Lyme disease, clinically significant cardiac disease, HIV, HTLV-1)
* Associated traumatic conditions interfering with informed consent or outcome assessment (e.g. closed head injury, liver contusion)
* Known uncorrected severe coronary artery disease or evidence of active coronary ischemia (ECG changes, positive Troponin) will be excluded from SCPP randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Paralyzed Veterans of America

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

American Association of Neurological Surgeons

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Steve Casha

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Casha, MD PhD FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

R. John Hurlbert, MD PhD FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

David Zygun, MD MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Casha S, Zygun D, McGowan MD, Bains I, Yong VW, Hurlbert RJ. Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injury. Brain. 2012 Apr;135(Pt 4):1224-36. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws072.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22505632 (View on PubMed)

Carnini A, Casha S, Yong VW, Hurlbert RJ, Braun JE. Reduction of PrP(C) in human cerebrospinal fluid after spinal cord injury. Prion. 2010 Apr-Jun;4(2):80-6. doi: 10.4161/pri.4.2.11756. Epub 2010 Apr 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20418657 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PVA2414

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

17007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stem Cell Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02009124 WITHDRAWN PHASE2
TSCS for Acute SCI
NCT05305118 RECRUITING NA
NVG-291 in Spinal Cord Injury Subjects
NCT05965700 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Spinal Cord Neuromodulation for Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02313194 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2