Erythropoietin Spinal Cord Compression Randomized Trial

NCT ID: NCT00220675

Last Updated: 2008-05-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-08-31

Study Completion Date

2007-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine whether erythropoietin, steroids and radiotherapy is safe and feasible to administer to patients with malignant spinal cord compression.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For patients with malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) who are paraparetic or paraplegic before initiating treatment, the current treatment options provide a meager to poor chance of neurologic recovery and the prognosis is guarded. Improving the chance of ambulation after treatment for MSCC may dramatically improve patients' quality of life, decrease days spent in hospital and improve survival. Steroids appear to prevent neurologic damage from MSCC and increasing doses appear to have an increasingly protective effect, however, higher doses are limited by an increasing incidence of serious toxicity.

Recombinant human erythropoetin has been shown to improve quality of life in patients with anemia of chronic disease and animal models suggest that r-HuEPO may have a neuroprotective effect. Human studies have demonstrated increased CSF concentrations of r-HuEPO after intravenous administration, including patients with MESCC. Furthermore, there is a suggestion that patients treated with intravenous r-HuEPO, steroids and RT may recover ambulatory function to a greater degree and faster than patients not treated with r-HuEPO.

Ultimately the effect of r-HuEPO in improving neurologic, functional and quality of life outcomes will need to be tested in a properly designed, large, randomized control trial. However, in order to successfully complete this study in a timely manner, a multicenter study will need to be performed. There are logistical issues that need to be addressed when setting up a r-HuEPO infusion program.

Therefore, a multicenter, randomized phase 2 study of intravenous r-HuEPO, steroids and RT will allow the investigators to address three issues: i) confirm that the logistical issues at each center can be addressed; ii) confirm in a larger cohort of patients whether the encouraging neurologic outcomes seen in the preliminary study can be replicated across different settings when compared with a randomized control group; iii) ensure the safety of EPO in this population including overall survival and incidence of subsequent TVEs with and without EPO.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nerve Compression Syndromes

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Malignant extradural spinal cord compression Erythropoietin Neuroprotectant Radiotherapy Palliation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erythropoietin infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (\> 18 years old) with histopathologically confirmed cancer
* Patients unable to ambulate independently due to paraparesis or paraplegia from malignant epidural spinal cord compression (categories 2, 3, 4 in Appendix B)
* Radiotherapy offered for treatment of cord compression using 2000cGy in 5 fractions
* Informed consent signed
* Females subjects must be post-menopausal or surgically incapable of childbearing potential, must be practicing an acceptable method of birth control (i.e., hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier and spermicide)

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure \> 160 mmHg, diastolic \> 100 mmHg) or unstable cardiovascular disease
* Previous DVT/PE or arterial embolic event
* Patients with a Hb \> 120 g/L or Hct \> 40% (for both males \& females)
* Patients with potentially curable disease
* Patients with life expectancy \< 3 months
* Patients who have received RT that would overlap with the planned treatment field
* Contraindications for MRI scan
* Women who are pregnant, or who intend to become pregnant, or who are nursing
* Patients with known brain metastases; those with a primary diagnosis of melanoma will require confirmation by CT or MRI
* Patients with a history of poorly controlled seizure disorder
* Patients with a known hypersensitivity to mammalian cell-derived products or albumin
* Patients who cannot receive adequate antithrombotic treatment, who have a hypersensitivity to the active antithrombotic substance or any of the product's excipients
* Patients who have participated in another investigational device or drug trial(s), or is receiving other investigational agent(s) within the previous 30 days
* Patients requiring neurosurgical decompression for the malignant spinal cord compression
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ortho Biotech, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew Loblaw, MD MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Science Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Regional Health Science Center

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Regional Cancer Center

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Science Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9427-T0926-28C

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id