Combining Observational and Physiologic Sedation Assessment Tools

NCT ID: NCT00538369

Last Updated: 2015-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When a physiologic tool to measure the patient's hypnotic state is added to current practice tools is there a decrease in the amount of drug the patient receives.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purposes of this study were to examine the effect of combining a physiologic measure of consciousness (BIS) with observational assessment of sedation (Ramsay) on infused sedation drug volumes, undersedation events, and the recovery time to arouse from sedation, in a group of neurocritically ill patients. During a 12-hour data collection period, patients received sedation assessment and management with either the current standard of care (sedation assessment with the Ramsay scale), or the standard of care plus the addition of physiologic data from BIS monitoring. Planned research questions explored how BIS monitoring impacts short-term sedation-related outcomes.

Research Questions

* Is there less sedation drug use for patients when nurses monitor sedation with BIS augmentation of Ramsay than when nurses monitor patients with Ramsay alone?
* Is sedation assessment augmented by BIS use associated with a decreased time to wake-up (recovery time) when nurses are instructed to interrupt sedation and obtain a neurologic examination, compared to use of Ramsay alone?
* Are there differences in the number of events associated with undersedation (e.g., self-extubation) for patients assigned to BIS augmentation compared to patients assigned to Ramsay alone?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

standard-of-care

The standard-of-care group will receive sedation assessment and monitoring with the Ramsay scale, which is the accepted tool at this university

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ramsay Scale

Intervention Type OTHER

While receiving sedation, subjects will be monitored with the Ramsay scale

standard + BIS

Subjects in the standard-of-care + BIS group will receive sedation assessment and monitoring using the Ramsay scale and values from the bispectral index (BIS) monitor.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ramsay Scale

Intervention Type OTHER

While receiving sedation, subjects will be monitored with the Ramsay scale

Bispectral index monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

While receiving sedation, subjects will receive BIS monitoring

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ramsay Scale

While receiving sedation, subjects will be monitored with the Ramsay scale

Intervention Type OTHER

Bispectral index monitor

While receiving sedation, subjects will receive BIS monitoring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ramsay sedation scale BIS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult
* admitted with a neurological or neurosurgical diagnosis
* intubated and on mechanical ventilatory support
* receiving continuous sedation with propofol
* Glasgow Coma Score \<12

Exclusion Criteria

* bifrontal brain injury
* status epilepticus
* barbiturate coma therapy
* continuous benzodiazepine administration
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of North Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medtronic - MITG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

DaiWai M Olson, PhD RN CCRN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Suzanne M Thoyre, PhD RN

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Carmelo Graffagnino, MD FRCPC

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J. 1974 Jun 22;2(5920):656-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4835444 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8771-06 - 8RO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Pro00008519

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Audiovisual Aid Pilot Study
NCT02506673 COMPLETED NA
Sedation and Memory Consolidation
NCT05045170 COMPLETED NA