Choosing Healthful Interventions

NCT ID: NCT00537706

Last Updated: 2017-07-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

442 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-21

Study Completion Date

2011-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will identify what programs, along with traditional healthcare, low-income urban residents would choose to improve their health. The information is intended as a step toward designing public policies aimed at improving the health of low-income populations in the United States.

Residents of Washington, D.C., who are between 18 and 64 years of age and are in a specified income bracket may be eligible for this study.

Participants take part in audio-taped group discussions led by a trained facilitator. During a 3 hour session, participants engage in 4 cycles of choosing benefits. Participants select benefits as follows:

* For themselves individually.
* For their neighborhood.
* For an entire city.
* Once again individually.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

There is a growing recognition that health status is only partially a function of health care. Socio-economic determinants of health, particularly income status and education, have significant effects on health status and outcomes. In light of these socio-economic determinants, several governments in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) are adopting evidence-based policy recommendations for improving the health of their populations. Britain has conducted research that has been path breaking in identifying these determinants of health and in planning to address them. Canada has similar plans.

OBJECTIVE:

The goal of this project is to explore the possibility of designing public policies aimed at improving the health of urban low-income populations in the US. Toward this end, this project will engage health policy experts and low-income residents in an exploratory exercise aimed at designing an affordable, evidence-based intervention program targeted at addressing socio-economic factors and reducing health disparities among low income residents of Washington, DC. A three step process will be carried out:

1. Identification of candidate interventions that have been shown to ameliorate the socio-economic determinants of health, through literature review and consultation with experts;
2. Consideration of a reasonable per capita expenditure for the purpose;
3. Engagement of low-income residents to ascertain their priorities for publicly funding the proposed interventions within the assigned budget.

Several hundred low-income adults recruited from clinical and community settings will participate in this engagement process through small group exercises in which a facilitated discussion will take place using a previously tested group decision tool, REACH (Reaching Economic Alternatives that Contribute to Health). Data pertaining to participants' socio-demographic characteristics, attitudes toward health, and preferences for possible interventions will be collected anonymously. Group discussions will be audio-taped. Data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively to determine preferences for various interventions and their association with socio-demographic characteristics. Participants will be financially compensated with $75 for their participation.

RISKS AND BENEFITS:

Given the anonymous nature of the data collection, we anticipate no risks other than those entailed in discussion of poor health outcomes associated with lack of insurance and low income. Participants may benefit from learning about factors that improve health status.

OUTCOME AND MEANING TO THE FIELD:

Study results will yield information about benefits that are of utmost priority to low income urban residents. This is unique information that may contribute to efforts to find affordable strategies for ameliorating the socio-economic determinants of health for low-income urban population in the US.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Socioeconomic Factors Low-Income Population Health Status

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Low-income male and female adults will be recruited as study participants.

Exclusion Criteria

Children 18 years and younger are ineligible.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nancy Ames, R.N.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Howard University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Danis M, Lovett F, Sabik L, Adikes K, Cheng G, Aomo T. Low-income employees' choices regarding employment benefits aimed at improving the socioeconomic determinants of health. Am J Public Health. 2007 Sep;97(9):1650-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.091033. Epub 2007 Jul 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17666702 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

07-CC-N224

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

999907224

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Healthy Corner Store Initiative
NCT00593749 COMPLETED NA
Clinical Trial Preference Study
NCT06735469 COMPLETED
Community Discussions and Social Participation
NCT07013357 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Functional Medicine Health Coaching
NCT05551546 COMPLETED NA