Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
212 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-10-31
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Teens and a parent are interviewed briefly over the phone to see if they are appropriate for the study. If they qualify for the study, there is an hour-long interview with teen over the telephone and a 30 minute interview with the parent. The interview will include questions about the teen's mood, feelings, behavior, and how they get along with friends and family members. The parent is also asked about his or her own feelings and mood. If the teen and parent join the study, they will be interviewed six more times in the next two years.
Half the teens in the study will also meet with a research counselor for five to nine individual, weekly sessions that last about 50 minutes each. Whether a teen attends the weekly counseling sessions is decided by chance, like flipping a coin. If teens are assigned to these sessions, they will learn ways to deal with stress and feel better. If teens take part in the counseling sessions, the study counselor will also talk to the teen's doctor from time to time to help plan for the best possible care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CBT Insomnia Teens: Augmenting SSRIs to Improve Youth Depression
NCT02290496
Behavioral Telehealth in Low-resource Primary Care Settings for Anxiety and Depression in Youth
NCT06273982
Behavioral Activation With Depressed Adolescents
NCT01137149
Determining Effectiveness of an mHealth Intervention to Provide Adolescent CBT
NCT04603053
Reaching Out to Adolescents With Depression
NCT01140464
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The STAND study is a two-arm, randomized, efficacy-effectiveness trial in primarily a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), comparing a treatment as usual (TAU) control condition to TAU plus brief, individual, collaborative care CBT delivered in primary care. We will enroll 240 youth ages 12 to 18 who, during this depressive episode, have either declined anti-depressant medication or who received a single dispense of anti-depressant medication but quickly discontinued. All enrolled cases will be reassessed periodically throughout a 24-month follow-up period. The primary clinical outcome is recovery from the index episode of major depression, assessed via research diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include continuous depression symptomatology; depression response; rates of new, recurrent episodes of major depression in the follow-up period; improvements in psychosocial function; clinical improvement; reduction in depression-related dysfunction; parent/youth attitudes regarding treatment. We will also examine incremental cost-effectiveness of CBT compared to TAU from the HMO, family, and societal perspectives. We will conduct exploratory analyses of mediation and moderation of depression treatment outcomes, and employ data from the TAU control condition to estimate the usual outcomes for depressed youth who refuse/discontinue antidepressant medication. Finally, we will examine how provider, parent and youth barriers, attitudes and beliefs moderate outcomes, as well as possibly change over time as a function of participation in this program.
The validation of a primary care model for brief CBT may prove to be a significant benefit to the sizeable numbers of depressed youth identified in primary care, and who elect not to try anti-depressant medication or quickly discontinue an initial trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
Teens in the experimental group will meet with a research counselor for five to nine individual, 50-minute weekly sessions. They will learn ways to deal with stress and feel better. The study counselor will also talk to the teen's doctor from time to time to help plan for the best possible care.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
Half the teens in the study will also meet with a research counselor for five to nine individual, weekly sessions that last about 50 minutes each. Whether a teen attends the weekly counseling sessions is decided by chance, like flipping a coin. If teens are assigned to these sessions, they will learn ways to deal with stress and feel better. If teens take part in the counseling sessions, the study counselor will also talk to the teen's doctor from time to time to help plan for the best possible care.
Active Control
Active control
Teens in the active control arm will keep seeing their doctor as usual. Teens and a parent are interviewed briefly over the phone to see if they are appropriate for the study. If they qualify for the study, there is an hour-long interview with teen over the telephone and a 30 minute interview with the parent. They will be interviewed six more times in the next two years.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
Half the teens in the study will also meet with a research counselor for five to nine individual, weekly sessions that last about 50 minutes each. Whether a teen attends the weekly counseling sessions is decided by chance, like flipping a coin. If teens are assigned to these sessions, they will learn ways to deal with stress and feel better. If teens take part in the counseling sessions, the study counselor will also talk to the teen's doctor from time to time to help plan for the best possible care.
Active control
Teens in the active control arm will keep seeing their doctor as usual. Teens and a parent are interviewed briefly over the phone to see if they are appropriate for the study. If they qualify for the study, there is an hour-long interview with teen over the telephone and a 30 minute interview with the parent. They will be interviewed six more times in the next two years.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Current diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder
Exclusion Criteria
* Bipolar
* Taking anti-depressant medication
* Significant intellectual impairment
* Recent treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy
12 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Kaiser Permanente
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Greg N Clarke, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kaiser Permanente
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dickerson JF, Lynch FL, Leo MC, DeBar LL, Pearson J, Clarke GN. Cost-effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depressed Youth Declining Antidepressants. Pediatrics. 2018 Feb;141(2):e20171969. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1969. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.