Optimal Dose of Omeprazole After Endoscopic Treatment of Bleeding Peptic Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT00519519

Last Updated: 2017-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2007-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Bleeding peptic ulcers are one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality for hospital emergency admissions.The initial treatment is endoscopic therapy followed by intravenous omeprazole. However the optimal dosage of omeprazole is not known. We conducted this study to find out the optimal dosage in such clinical scenario.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction

Peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is a common and life threatening condition. Intravenous infusion of high dose omeprazole (80mg as bolus followed by 8 mg/hr for 72 hours ie 652 mg/72 hrs) after endoscopic therapy resulted in greater reductions of re-bleeding than did placebo. Thus the above regime became our departmental protocol. However, there is some evidence that both high dose and a regular dose of omeprazole (40mg once a day followed by a saline infusion ie 120mg/72 hrs) would be equally effective. We calculated that high dose regimen is about S$ 500 more expensive. The aim of our study is to determine the equivalence of both regimes in preventing re-bleeding rate (primary end-point), surgery and mortality in PUB patients.

Study design This is a single institution prospective randomized double-blind study. All patient with PUB (Forrest classification I, IIa and IIb: spurting or oozing bleeding, visible vessels and clot) had endoscopic treatments (adrenaline injection and/or heater probe). After successful endoscopic hemostasis, patients are randomized to receive a high or regular dose of omeprazole infusion. After 72 hours, both groups of patients are given oral omeprazole 40mg daily for 4 weeks. All patients are evaluated at the clinic at the end of 4 weeks. The primary end-point is rebleeding. Other secondary endpoints measured are surgery, duration of hospital stay and death.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bleeding Peptic Ulcers Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2

regular dose versus high dose

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Omeprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous 80mg bolus followed by 8mg / hr for 3 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Omeprazole

intravenous 80mg bolus followed by 8mg / hr for 3 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

intravenous 40 mg om for 3 days

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Above 21 year old
2. OGD done within 48 hrs of admission
3. No recent upper GIT surgery past one month
4. Forrest Type I, IIa \& IIb ulcer (Type Ia: Spurting, Ib:Oozing, IIa: Visible vessel, IIb: Clot)
5. Non-malignant ulcer
6. Informed consent taken

Exclusion Criteria

1. Impaired hepatic function
2. Pregnancy
3. Lactation
4. Concomitant medication (warfarin, diazepam, phenytoin, chlarithromycin, cimetidine and digoxin)
5. Underlying malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Singapore General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Weng Hoong Chan, MBBS, FRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Singapore General Hospital

Weng Hoong Chan, MBBS, FRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital

Outram Road, Singapore, Outram Road, Singapore

Site Status

Singapore General Hospital

Outram Road, Singapore, Outram Road, Singapore

Site Status

Department of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, Outram Road, Singapore

Site Status

Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, Outram Road, Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chan WH, Khin LW, Chung YF, Goh YC, Ong HS, Wong WK. Randomized controlled trial of standard versus high-dose intravenous omeprazole after endoscopic therapy in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Br J Surg. 2011 May;98(5):640-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7420. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21305536 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

78:10/03-098

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.