Feedback of Treatment Intensification Data to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk (FIT)

NCT ID: NCT00517686

Last Updated: 2012-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16584 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary research question of this study is to determine whether measuring, reporting and feeding back information to primary care teams on the need for treatment intensification in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) can improve rates of treatment intensification and reduce levels of poorly controlled systolic blood pressure, LDL-c, and A1c.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Project Description: We propose a cluster randomized trial intervention involving eight or more medical facilities of Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KP) and more than 65,000 patients at high risk for CVD. At intervention facilities, patient-level information obtained from KP's electronic health record on the need for treatment intensification (for systolic blood pressure, LDL-c, and A1c) and on recent medication adherence are added to a population management database and fed back through software currently used by staff working with primary care providers. Staff at control facilities continue to use the same population management database and software but only receive information on risk factor levels and selected medications.

Specific Aims:

1. Evaluate the effectiveness of measurement and feedback of treatment intensification information in patients at high risk of CVD for improving rates of treatment intensification and for reducing levels of poorly controlled systolic blood pressure, LDL-c, and A1c.
2. Evaluate the impact of the intervention, compared with current practice, on total numbers of patient contacts, outpatient visits, and costs of care in relation to improvements in risk factor control.
3. Evaluate the effect of this innovation on physician and staff perceptions of the value (effectiveness and efficiency) of the population management program for high-risk patients.

Relevance: If this translational study shows that feedback of information on treatment intensification leads to higher rates of intensification and improved risk factor control, this finding will have shown a population-level use of health information technology for improving clinical quality and will also have validated treatment intensification as a metric of clinical quality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Factors

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Poor risk factor control Treatment intensification Medication adherence Cardiovascular disease (CVD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

The study will use automated databases and PHASE information systems to identify patients and incorporate feedback on a monthly basis into the ongoing reports used by program staff at facilities randomized to this intervention arm (n=4).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Information feedback intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

This study will evaluate an information feedback intervention: measuring, reporting and feeding back information to primary care teams on the need for treatment intensification in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

2

Usual care facilities (n=4) will continue to use current PHASE reports that include information on recent risk factor levels and current use of selected medications but no treatment intensification information, and no information on medication adherence.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Information feedback intervention

This study will evaluate an information feedback intervention: measuring, reporting and feeding back information to primary care teams on the need for treatment intensification in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Among the randomized medical facilities, we will study a population that is drawn from the PHASE registry and includes patients with at least one of the following:

* Diabetes, coronary artery disease; congestive heart failure; stroke/tia; peripheral artery disease; chronic kidney disease; hypertension; or hyperlipidemia
* PHASE patients must be in poor control for at least one CVD risk factor and meet study criteria for needing treatment intensification at some point during the 6-month period.

Exclusion Criteria

* All patients eligible for the study will be included in the analyses
* There will be no exclusions based on clinical or other criteria.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kaiser Permanente

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joe V Selby, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaiser Permenante, Division of Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kaiser Permanente - Division of Research

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Selby JV, Schmittdiel JA, Fireman B, Jaffe M, Ransom LJ, Dyer W, Uratsu CS, Reed ME, Kerr EA, Hsu J. Improving treatment intensification to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 2;12:183. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-183.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22747998 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RFA-HS-07-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id