BestFIT: a Personalized Weight Loss Program

NCT ID: NCT02368002

Last Updated: 2021-12-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

468 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to learn how to personalize weight loss programs. In this research we will study:

1. Whether a weight loss counselor should decide if the traditional weight loss therapy is working either after 3 or 7 weekly sessions of therapy and
2. For those who haven't lost the expected amount of weight, whether it is more effective to add packaged meals to the traditional weight loss therapy or to change to an enhanced version of behavioral weight loss therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends referral to behavioral weight loss programs to help obese adults achieve a clinically meaningful weight loss of 8-10% of starting body weight. However, approximately half of participants are unable to achieve this goal. Despite this, a"one size fits all" approach is the norm, a major drawback because those who do not respond can in fact be detected early. This gap in weight loss intervention science calls for an adaptive intervention approach that could provide the "right treatment at the right time for the right person". Adaptive interventions individualize treatment through empirically-supported decision rules advising when and how treatments should unfold over time to maximize effectiveness. Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMART), developed explicitly to build the best adaptive interventions, use experimental design principles to develop these decision rules. The investigators will use a SMART to systematically evaluate therapeutic approach and timing differences for intervening with those who do not respond to a behavioral weight loss program. Self-regulation challenges have been identified as a major adherence barrier. Two attractive options to address self-regulation difficulties are: 1) supplementing behavioral treatment with Meal Replacements (MR) which decreases the need for self-regulation; and 2) switching therapeutic approaches by using an enhanced version of behavioral weight loss therapy that teaches acceptance based behavioral skills which boost capacity for self-regulation. Additionally, two time points for intervening with non-responders will be evaluated: 1) 3 weeks, based on current weight loss trial evidence; and 2) 7 weeks, based on average time used in the existing stepped care literature. Adults (n=500) will be recruited and will receive individual behavioral weight loss treatment (BWL). Participants will be randomized to either: 1) treatment response assessment at 3 weeks or 2) treatment response assessment at 7 weeks. Subjects who have lost the expected amount of weight at their assessment point, will continue with traditional behavioral weight loss therapy. For those who have not lost the expected amount of weight, we will re-randomize them to either meal replacements in addition to the traditional weight loss therapy or to the enhanced version of behavioral weight loss therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

obesity diet, reducing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Behavioral weight loss therapy

Emphasizes 1) identifying behaviors in need of change, 2) setting goals for change, 3) monitoring progress, 4) modifying environmental cues to facilitate change, and 5) modifying consequences to motivate change.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral weight loss therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants start with behavioral weight loss therapy which consists of 20 weekly meetings wtih a weight loss coach. Session components will include weekly weigh-in, discussion of progress and challenges and discussion of scheduled session topic. Dietary goals and physical activity goals are set. After their first session, participants are randomized to have their weight assessed at either their 3rd session or their 7th session. Both the participant and their coach are blinded to the randomization. If the participant has lost the expected amount of weight, they continue with behavioral weight loss therapy for the full 20 session.

Portion-controlled meals

Fifty percent of participants who have not lost the expected amount of weight will be re-randomized to receive portion-controlled meals in addition to standard behavioral weight loss therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Portion-controlled meals

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants continue with behavioral weight loss therapy, but this is augmented with portion-controlled meals (PCM). Adherence to energy intake goals is facilitated by consuming pre-prepared meals specifically designed to meet caloric intake guidelines. PCMs reduce individuals' motivationally- and self-regulatory-dependent planning and decision making around eating. PCMs also serve as a "teaching tool" regarding the amount and type of food people should eat in order to produce weight loss.

Acceptance-based treatment

Fifty percent of participants who have not lost the expected amount of weight will be re-randomized to receive an enhanced version of behavioral weight loss therapy teaching acceptance-based behavioral skills.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acceptance-based treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Switching the therapeutic approach to an enhanced behavioral weight loss therapy teaching acceptance-based behavioral skills theoretically addresses the root problem of many weight loss challenges and boosts long-term capacity for self-regulation. Acceptance based strategies are designed to help participants identify and internalize values and lasting commitment to behavior consistent with these values. The strategies focus on increasing people's ability to forgo more pleasurable options (e.g., hedonic pleasure of food) in favor of behavior that is distinctly less pleasurable or even aversive (remaining hungry, anxious, bored). The inability to tolerate such distress is directly associated with failure of self-regulation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Behavioral weight loss therapy

All participants start with behavioral weight loss therapy which consists of 20 weekly meetings wtih a weight loss coach. Session components will include weekly weigh-in, discussion of progress and challenges and discussion of scheduled session topic. Dietary goals and physical activity goals are set. After their first session, participants are randomized to have their weight assessed at either their 3rd session or their 7th session. Both the participant and their coach are blinded to the randomization. If the participant has lost the expected amount of weight, they continue with behavioral weight loss therapy for the full 20 session.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Portion-controlled meals

Participants continue with behavioral weight loss therapy, but this is augmented with portion-controlled meals (PCM). Adherence to energy intake goals is facilitated by consuming pre-prepared meals specifically designed to meet caloric intake guidelines. PCMs reduce individuals' motivationally- and self-regulatory-dependent planning and decision making around eating. PCMs also serve as a "teaching tool" regarding the amount and type of food people should eat in order to produce weight loss.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Acceptance-based treatment

Switching the therapeutic approach to an enhanced behavioral weight loss therapy teaching acceptance-based behavioral skills theoretically addresses the root problem of many weight loss challenges and boosts long-term capacity for self-regulation. Acceptance based strategies are designed to help participants identify and internalize values and lasting commitment to behavior consistent with these values. The strategies focus on increasing people's ability to forgo more pleasurable options (e.g., hedonic pleasure of food) in favor of behavior that is distinctly less pleasurable or even aversive (remaining hungry, anxious, bored). The inability to tolerate such distress is directly associated with failure of self-regulation.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between the ages of 21 - 70
* BMI between 30 - 45 kg/m2
* Able to walk 2 blocks without stopping
* Able to attend measurement and intervention activities in the Twin Cities area in person for 18 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Self-reported pregnancy or breastfeeding baby in last 6 months or planning a pregnancy in the next 18 months
* History of bariatric surgery
* Current or previous diagnosis of anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa
* Food allergies, intolerances
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Drexel University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

HealthPartners Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nancy E Sherwood, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota

A. Lauren Crain, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HealthPartners Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HealthPartners Institute

Bloomington, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carels RA, Darby L, Cacciapaglia HM, Douglass OM, Harper J, Kaplar ME, Konrad K, Rydin S, Tonkin K. Applying a stepped-care approach to the treatment of obesity. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Dec;59(6):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.060.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16310019 (View on PubMed)

Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy SA. A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:21-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143152. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22224838 (View on PubMed)

Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17466815 (View on PubMed)

Butryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;34(4):841-59. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22098808 (View on PubMed)

Rock CL, Flatt SW, Sherwood NE, Karanja N, Pakiz B, Thomson CA. Effect of a free prepared meal and incentivized weight loss program on weight loss and weight loss maintenance in obese and overweight women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1803-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1503. Epub 2010 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20935338 (View on PubMed)

Heymsfield SB, van Mierlo CA, van der Knaap HC, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 May;27(5):537-49. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802258.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12704397 (View on PubMed)

Forman EM, Hoffman KL, McGrath KB, Herbert JD, Brandsma LL, Lowe MR. A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: an analog study. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Oct;45(10):2372-86. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17544361 (View on PubMed)

Sherwood NE, Butryn ML, Forman EM, Almirall D, Seburg EM, Lauren Crain A, Kunin-Batson AS, Hayes MG, Levy RL, Jeffery RW. The BestFIT trial: A SMART approach to developing individualized weight loss treatments. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26825020 (View on PubMed)

Emery Tavernier RL, Mason SM, Levy RL, Seburg EM, Sherwood NE. Association of childhood abuse with behavioral weight-loss outcomes: Examining the mediating effect of binge eating severity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Jan;30(1):96-105. doi: 10.1002/oby.23320.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34932887 (View on PubMed)

Sherwood NE, Crain AL, Seburg EM, Butryn ML, Forman EM, Crane MM, Levy RL, Kunin-Batson AS, Jeffery RW. BestFIT Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Results: A SMART Approach to Developing Individualized Weight Loss Treatment Sequences. Ann Behav Med. 2022 Mar 1;56(3):291-304. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab061.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34415011 (View on PubMed)

Crane MM, Seburg EM, Levy RL, Jeffery RW, Sherwood NE. Using targeting to recruit men and women of color into a behavioral weight loss trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 16;21(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04500-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32546253 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01CA188892-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1R01CA188892-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link