A Study With Combination Treatment (Tamsulosin Hydrochloride and Solifenacin Succinate) in Male Patients With LUTS/BPH

NCT ID: NCT00510406

Last Updated: 2014-08-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

919 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will examine the efficacy,safety and tolerability of combination therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin compared to placebo and monotherapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin in the treatment of males with LUTS associated with BPH.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Placebo Solifenacin succinate Tamsulosin hydrochloride Tamsulosin hydrochloride + solifenacin succinate

The primary comparison will be the combination treatment with tamsulosin hydrochloride monotherapy.

Other comparisons will be:

Placebo and combination treatment. Solifenacin monotherapy and combination treatment

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Prostatic Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

B

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

solifenacin succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

antimuscarinic

C

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

solifenacin succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

antimuscarinic

D

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

solifenacin succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

antimuscarinic

E

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tamsulosin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Alphablocker

F

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tamsulosin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Alphablocker

solifenacin succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

antimuscarinic

G

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tamsulosin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Alphablocker

solifenacin succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

antimuscarinic

H

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tamsulosin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Alphablocker

solifenacin succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

antimuscarinic

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tamsulosin hydrochloride

Alphablocker

Intervention Type DRUG

solifenacin succinate

antimuscarinic

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male patients with LUTS associated with BPH diagnosed \> 3 months
* IPSS score \> 13
* voiding and storage symptoms
* maximum flow rate of \> 4 mL/s and \< 15 mL/s

Exclusion Criteria

* post void residual volume \> 200 mL
* symptomatic urinary tract infection
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Central Contact

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Linz, North-West, Austria

Site Status

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Skejby, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Lahti, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Cote de Nacre, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montluçon, , France

Site Status

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Ploemeur, , France

Site Status

Bad Segeberg, , Germany

Site Status

Bamberg, , Germany

Site Status

Bautzen, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Eisleben Lutherstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Ganderkessee, , Germany

Site Status

Hagenow, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Henningsdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hettstedt, , Germany

Site Status

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Neustadt in Sachsen, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Uetersen, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyiregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Sopron, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Site Status

S'Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

Deventer, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, Provincie Friesland, Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Site Status

Fredrikstad, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lódz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Puławy, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Amadora-Sintra, , Portugal

Site Status

Carmo, , Portugal

Site Status

Coimbra (Covões), , Portugal

Site Status

Orta EPE, , Portugal

Site Status

Pulido Valente, , Portugal

Site Status

Santa Luzia, , Portugal

Site Status

Tomar, , Portugal

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Pontevedra, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Kungälv, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Sundsvall, , Sweden

Site Status

Uddevalla, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Chorley, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Russia Slovakia Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Van Kerrebroeck P, Haab F, Angulo JC, Vik V, Katona F, Garcia-Hernandez A, Klaver M, Traudtner K, Oelke M. Efficacy and safety of solifenacin plus tamsulosin OCAS in men with voiding and storage lower urinary tract symptoms: results from a phase 2, dose-finding study (SATURN). Eur Urol. 2013 Sep;64(3):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23537687 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT number: 2006-002072-18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

905-CL-052

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EC905 Pharmacokinetic Profile Study
NCT02634489 COMPLETED PHASE1
Deprescribing Tamsulosin in Older Men
NCT05415748 COMPLETED PHASE4