Study of Solifenacin Succinate and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride OCAS in Males With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

NCT ID: NCT01018511

Last Updated: 2024-12-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1334 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-11

Study Completion Date

2011-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical study to examine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of combination therapy of tamsulosin hydrochloride and solifenacin succinate compared to monotherapy of tamsulosin hydrochloride in the treatment of males with LUTS associated with BPH with a substantial storage component.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) 0.4 mg tablet; Placebo fixed dose combination (FDC) tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

TOCAS 0.4 mg

Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS (TOCAS) 0.4 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg

Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Placebo TOCAS 0.4 mg tablet; FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/6 mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg

Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Placebo TOCAS 0.4 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/9 mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg

tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg

tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/6 mg)

tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/9 mg)

tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Harnal ® Omnic® Flomax® YM617 Vesomni EC905 EC905

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Voiding and storage symptoms diagnosed as LUTS associated with BPH for ≥ 3 months
* A total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥13
* A maximum urinary flow rate of ≥4.0 mL/s and ≤12.0 mL/s, with voided volume of ≥120 mL during free flow
* A micturition frequency of ≥8 and at least 2 episodes of urgency with Patient Perception of the Intensity of Urgency Scale grade 3 or 4 per day on average on the 3 day micturition diary (at randomization)

Exclusion Criteria

* Any significant Post Void Residual volume (\>150 mL)
* A prostate with estimated weight ≥75 ml as assessed by transvesical or transrectal ultrasound
* Evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Use Central Contact

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Astellas Pharma Global Development

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Assebroek, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint-Truiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Roudnice nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Zdar, , Czechia

Site Status

Aix-en-Provence, , France

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Montluçon, , France

Site Status

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Bad Ems, , Germany

Site Status

Bautzen, , Germany

Site Status

Eisleben Lutherstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Hagenow, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Henningsdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hettstedt, , Germany

Site Status

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Neustadt in Sachsen, , Germany

Site Status

Uetersen, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Körmend, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Sopron, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Szentes, , Hungary

Site Status

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Avellino, , Italy

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Catanzaro, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Treviglio, , Italy

Site Status

Turin, , Italy

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Doetinchem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Etten-Leur, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Winterswijk, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bielsko-Biala, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Puławy, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Więcbork, , Poland

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Piešťany, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Skalica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chorley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Northwood, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Taunton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Torquay, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belarus Belgium Czechia France Germany Hungary Italy Netherlands Poland Russia Slovakia United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Kerrebroeck P, Chapple C, Drogendijk T, Klaver M, Sokol R, Speakman M, Traudtner K, Drake MJ; NEPTUNE Study Group. Combination therapy with solifenacin and tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system in a single tablet for lower urinary tract symptoms in men: efficacy and safety results from the randomised controlled NEPTUNE trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):1003-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23932438 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/hcp/study.aspx?ID=38

Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001211-37

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

905-CL-055

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id