GnRH Agonist and Antagonists in an Oocyte Donation Program

NCT ID: NCT00505817

Last Updated: 2009-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the two different protocols (long protocol vs antagonist protocol) on oocyte / embryo quality.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The cycles with antagonists of the GnRHa present a series of advantages with respect the GnRHa in an oocyte donation program: treatment cycles are simpler and shorter, a lower amount of dose of gonadotrophins is needed for stimulation, and most important, a decreased rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is observed. Nevertheless, several clinical trials relate their use to a greater rate of abortion and worse oocyte/ embryo quality. In order to discriminate the endometrial factor from the quality of oocyte cohort, the best strategy is the oocyte donation model. In the present study, for the first time, the effect of different protocols (long versus antagonist protocol) will be studied in the same donor, acting as its own control, undergoing COH. We will compare the COH´s parameters and IVF outcome obtained in the same donor submitted to, firstly, GnRH antagonist protocol (Cetrorelix- n= 45) versus another consecutive cycle with long protocol (Ac. Leuprolide- n= 45).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Effect of Two Protocols of Ovarian Stimulation on Oocyte Quality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cetrorelix and Leuprolide

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* oocyte donors with age range: 18 - 34; BMI: 18 - 29 kg/m2;

Exclusion Criteria

* PCO
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

34 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marco Melo, MDPhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad Spain

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VLC-MM-0706-307-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antagonist Protocol in IVF
NCT02335736 UNKNOWN PHASE2
Cetrotide Treatment Optimization
NCT00866034 TERMINATED PHASE4