A Two-week Study Assessing the Onset of Effect Questionnaire (OEQ) Administered Daily Versus Weekly in Adult Subjects

NCT ID: NCT00449527

Last Updated: 2011-01-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

123 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2007-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate whether subjects respond similarly to the Onset of Effect Questionnaire (OEQ) using a 1 week recall period versus a 1 day recall period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Budesonide/formoterol pMDI

Intervention Type DRUG

Budesonide HFA pMDI

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Symbicort

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or Female, \> 18 years of age
* Mild to moderate asthma requiring treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid
* Diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids (e.g., oral, parenteral, ocular)
* Subjects with severe asthma, as judged by investigator
* Any significant disease or disorder that may jeopardize a subject's safety
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tomas LG Andersson, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Tuscumbia, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Valrico, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

River Forest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Florence, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Papillion, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Skillman, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Summit, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Union, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

South Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bellingham, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leidy NK, Gutierrez B, Lampl K, Uryniak T, O'Brien CD. Can patients with asthma feel inhaler therapy working right away? Two clinical trials testing the effect of timing of assessment on patient perception. J Asthma. 2009 Dec;46(10):1006-12. doi: 10.3109/02770900903301260.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19995138 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D5896C00023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.