REVAXIS® Versus DT Polio® as a Second Booster in 6 Year-old Children

NCT ID: NCT00447525

Last Updated: 2017-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

760 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2008-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary objective:

To demonstrate the non inferiority between REVAXIS® and DT Polio® when given as a second booster to healthy 6 year-old children .

Secondary objectives:

* Additional immunogenicity assessments.
* To describe the safety profile of a single dose of REVAXIS® or DT-Polio®

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diphtheria Tetanus Poliomyelitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REVAXIS®

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DT-Polio®

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

REVAXIS®

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

DT-Polio®

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Healthy child without chronic severe disease of either gender,
2. 6 year-old child on vaccination day,
3. Child previously vaccinated with three doses of a diphtheria, tetanus and poliomyelitis containing vaccine given alone or in combination within the first 6 months of life and a booster dose of a diphtheria, tetanus and poliomyelitis containing vaccine given alone or in combination at 16 - 18 months of life (±2 months),
4. Consent form signed by both parents, or by the legal representative, properly informed about the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Child who had received less or more than 4 doses of a diphtheria, tetanus and/or poliomyelitis containing vaccine,
2. Previous clinical or bacteriological diagnosis of diphtheria, tetanus or poliomyelitis,
3. Child who had received any vaccine in the previous 30 days or with a vaccination scheduled during the course of the study,
4. Child who present with immune impairment or humoral/cellular deficiency, neoplastic disease or depressed immunity,
5. Child who had received within the previous 150 days or who will receive during the course of the study, any immunoglobulins or blood derived products,
6. Child with true hypersensitivity to at least one of the components of a study vaccine or to streptomycin, neomycin or polymixin B,
7. Known personal history of encephalopathy, seizure disorder or progressive, evolving or unstable neurological condition,
8. Child who had presented severe hypersensitivity following an earlier immunization against diphtheria and/or tetanus,
9. Known history of thrombocytopenia or any coagulation disorder that would contraindicate intramuscular injection,
10. Acute severe febrile illness and/or oral temperature ≥37.5°C at the time of vaccination
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Albertville, , France

Site Status

Albi, , France

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Annecy, , France

Site Status

Anzin, , France

Site Status

Arras, , France

Site Status

Asnières, , France

Site Status

Avion, , France

Site Status

Bassens, , France

Site Status

Bersée, , France

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Blois, , France

Site Status

Boulogne, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Broglie, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Chalon-en-champagne, , France

Site Status

Champdeniers, , France

Site Status

Chigny-les-Roses, , France

Site Status

Cholet, , France

Site Status

Claix, , France

Site Status

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Collombey Les Belles, , France

Site Status

Draguignan, , France

Site Status

Enghien-les-Bains, , France

Site Status

Floirac, , France

Site Status

Frouard, , France

Site Status

Haguenau, , France

Site Status

Illkirch-Graffenstaden, , France

Site Status

Issy-les-Moulineaux, , France

Site Status

La Neuville-Roy, , France

Site Status

Laon, , France

Site Status

Le Havre, , France

Site Status

Les Pieux, , France

Site Status

Louverné, , France

Site Status

Louvigné-de-Bais, , France

Site Status

Manduel, , France

Site Status

Marcq-en-barouel, , France

Site Status

Maromme, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Miniac-Morvan, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Montsang/orge, , France

Site Status

Morangis, , France

Site Status

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nogent-sur-Marne, , France

Site Status

Ostwald, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Plouzané, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Pont-à-Mousson, , France

Site Status

Quimper, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Saint Sebastien Sur Loir, , France

Site Status

Saint-Ouen, , France

Site Status

Saint-Raphaël, , France

Site Status

Sanary Mer, , France

Site Status

Sèvres, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Villemomble, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gajdos V, Soubeyrand B, Vidor E, Richard P, Boyer J, Sadorge C, Fiquet A. Immunogenicity and safety of combined adsorbed low-dose diphtheria, tetanus and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (REVAXIS ((R))) versus combined diphtheria, tetanus and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (DT Polio ((R))) given as a booster dose at 6 years of age. Hum Vaccin. 2011 May;7(5):549-56. doi: 10.4161/hv.7.5.14982. Epub 2011 May 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21441781 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F05-TdI-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.