Reorganization of Brain Functions in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy Using fMRI and MRS

NCT ID: NCT00447343

Last Updated: 2017-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Decompressive surgery to relieve symptoms of spinal cord compression due to dysfunction, such as arthritis, has proved variable in success. Past research has reported that approximately one-third of surgery patients improved, one-third remained the same and one-third worsened. Currently, there are no reliable tests that can predict the outcome following surgery. We are hoping that this study will change that.

Using functional MRI (fMRI), we wish to investigate the relationship between clinical symptoms and the recovery of brain activation following surgery. One can also track the concentrations of different chemicals (metabolites) by using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). We hypothesize that the recovery of normal brain activation patterns will coincide with clinical improvement. Our objective in this study is to explore the potential role of fMRI as a tool to prognose patients with cervical myelopathy.

Twenty-five patients with cervical myelopathy will be imaged using a high-powered (3 Tesla) fMRI scanner before and six months following surgery. In addition, ten healthy controls will be imaged to provide a baseline measure. Both the patient and control groups will complete questionnaires at the time of their scans. These will provide information concerning the subjective experience of the individuals throughout recovery. We will compare brain activation patterns of control and patient groups to investigate how the brain heals following decompressive surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Degenerative arthritis is a universal concomitant of human aging, affecting 51% of the adult population. Arthritis of the spine is the most common cause of acquired spinal cord dysfunction and can manifest in subtle symptoms, such as diminished balance and dexterity, or profound symptoms, such as paralysis and incontinence. In cases where dysfunction results in severe spinal cord compression, surgery is performed. However, surgical outcomes are not always beneficial. Past research has reported that approximately one-third of surgery patients improved, one-third remained the same and one-third worsened. Currently, there are no reliable tests that can predict outcome following surgery. We are hoping that this study will change that.

Twenty-five patients will undergo 45 minute imaging sessions pre-operatively and six months post-operatively. Ten controls will undergo 45 minute imaging sessions twice to provide a baseline comparison and reproducibility. During each session, one motor task (finger tapping) and 1 sensory task (hand brushing) will be performed for 2 minutes at 10 second intervals. We wish to compare the change in volume extent, and location, and intensity of brain activation levels before and after surgery. We will also compare fMRI signal response differences between controls and patients. We hypothesize that the degree to which brain activation shifts towards normalcy (that of controls) will correlate with the degree of neurological recovery postoperatively.

Data will be analyzed using software developed at the Robarts Research Institute.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment group

Patients with cervical myelopathy undergoing decompressive cervical spine surgery will have two scans (pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively).

A blinded investigator will administer questionnaires at each time point.

Decompressive cervical spine surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Treatment group (25 patients) will undergo decompressive anterior cervical spine surgery

Healthy volunteers will ONLY undergo two scans 6 months apart.

fMRI and MRS scan

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A scan pre-op and 6 months post-op.

Control group

Healthy Volunteers will have two scans 6 months apart.

A blinded investigator will administer questionnaires at each time point.

fMRI and MRS scan

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A scan pre-op and 6 months post-op.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decompressive cervical spine surgery

Treatment group (25 patients) will undergo decompressive anterior cervical spine surgery

Healthy volunteers will ONLY undergo two scans 6 months apart.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fMRI and MRS scan

A scan pre-op and 6 months post-op.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All Participants will be

1. between 18 and 75 years of age
2. right handed
3. with normal/corrected hearing and vision
4. native speakers of Canadian or American English
5. must be competent to give consent.
* Cervical Myelopathy Patients will be:

1. Undergoing a first time cervical decompression for cervical spondylosis causing myelopathy secondary to spinal cord compression which is documented by a diagnostic procedure ( CT and/or MRI ).
2. Spinal cord compression from the cervicomedullary junction to the C7-T1 disc level.
3. Ability and willingness to participate in a follow-up fMRI study at 6 months following surgery.
* Healthy Control Volunteers will be:

1. Volunteers from the Dept. of Clinical Neurological Sciences

Exclusion Criteria

* Cervical Myelopathy Patients must not:

1\. have any pre-existing medical conditions (e.g. significant renal or hepatic disease)
* Healthy control volunteers must not:

1\. have a pre-existing diagnosis or history of a neurological disorder.
* All participants must not:

1\. have any potential magnetic metal fragments in their body except for titanium implants placed at the time of surgery will be excluded. Dental work is non-magnetic and does not require participant exclusion.
* Participants who fall into the following categories will not be tested in the 4T scanner:

1. claustrophobia
2. pacemaker or other electronic implants
3. being a welder or soldier
4. having been injured by a metallic object that was not removed
5. being pregnant or trying to conceive
6. women of childbearing potential who are not using an effective method of contraception
7. cerebral aneurysm clips.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

American Association of Neurological Surgeons

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neil Duggal, M.D., M.Sc.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London Health Sciences Center

Robert Bartha, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western University, Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Health Sciences Center

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

BRAIN WR, NORTHFIELD D, WILKINSON M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1952 Jun;75(2):187-225. doi: 10.1093/brain/75.2.187. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14934989 (View on PubMed)

Bunge RP, Puckett WR, Becerra JL, Marcillo A, Quencer RM. Observations on the pathology of human spinal cord injury. A review and classification of 22 new cases with details from a case of chronic cord compression with extensive focal demyelination. Adv Neurol. 1993;59:75-89. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8420126 (View on PubMed)

Carol MP, Ducker TB. Cervical spondylitic myelopathies: surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1988;1(1):59-65.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2980063 (View on PubMed)

Curt A, Alkadhi H, Crelier GR, Boendermaker SH, Hepp-Reymond MC, Kollias SS. Changes of non-affected upper limb cortical representation in paraplegic patients as assessed by fMRI. Brain. 2002 Nov;125(Pt 11):2567-78. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf250.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12390981 (View on PubMed)

Hunt WE. Cervical spondylosis: natural history and rare indications for surgical decompression. Clin Neurosurg. 1980;27:466-80. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/27.cn_suppl_1.466.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7273568 (View on PubMed)

LaRocca H. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: natural history. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jul;13(7):854-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00028. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3057650 (View on PubMed)

Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Jannetta PJ, Sheptak PE, Zorub DS. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases. J Neurosurg. 1980 Jul;53(1):1-11. doi: 10.3171/jns.1980.53.1.0001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7411195 (View on PubMed)

Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K, Yamasaki D, Nanjo Y. Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and mri of the spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jun 1;26(11):1238-45. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200106010-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11389390 (View on PubMed)

Rowland LP. Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: time for a controlled trial. Neurology. 1992 Jan;42(1):5-13. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.1.5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1734322 (View on PubMed)

Teramoto T, Ohmori K, Takatsu T, Inoue H, Ishida Y, Suzuki K. Long-term results of the anterior cervical spondylodesis. Neurosurgery. 1994 Jul;35(1):64-8. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199407000-00010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7936154 (View on PubMed)

Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Nov;17(11):1281-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1462201 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09994

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R-04-022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mirroring a Movement
NCT00123448 COMPLETED