Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
264 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-01-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The results of the Aberdeen Group (Smith et al, 2002 ; Hutcheon et al, 2003), of the NSABP B27 trial (Bear et al, 2003) and of the Gepar-Duo Group (Von Minckwitz et al, 2002) have shown that a sequential protocol, using docetaxel after an anthracycline-based combination, allowed a better clinical response leading to more frequent conservative surgeries and, more importantly, to an increase in the rate of complete pathological response, assessing a better efficacy.
The use of a reference adjuvant protocol as a neo-adjuvant treatment is fully admissible because 7 randomized trials have shown a perfect equivalence between an adjuvant protocol and the same chemotherapy given as an induction treatment Even keeping the principle of a sequential treatment, a crucial question is to know if this sequential treatment should be the same for all patients, or if the oncologist could get a better complete pathological response, disease-free or overall survival rates by an adaptation of treatment to the objective result beginning after 2 FEC 100 courses by modulation of the following courses.
We will use as a primary regimen 3 FEC cycles + 3 TAXOTERE cycles, a standard adjuvant regimen (noted in the Temporary Protocol of Treatment of the Inca page 5 (October 2005) as well as in Saint Paul de Vence 2005 recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy (Oncologie -- volume 7 - N°5, August 2005, p 370). This standard treatment will be compared to the same chemotherapy modulated in its repartition according to results obtained by subsequent tumor evaluations during induction therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High Dose Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Therapy in Treating Women With Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer
NCT00003032
Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Pathological Partial Response and Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT02879513
Assessment of the Efficacy of the Neoadjuvant Combination: "Chemotherapy-Targeted Therapy" in Breast Cancer.
NCT00933517
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women With Stage I Breast Cancer
NCT00055679
Dose Escalated Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer
NCT07021846
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
standard (A)
3 FEC100 followed 3 Taxotere
No interventions assigned to this group
Modulated (B)
possibility treatments receive: 2 FEC100 followed by 4 Taxotere 4 FEC100 followed by 2 Taxotere 6 FEC 100
Taxotere
5-Fluorouracil
Epirubicin
Cyclophosphamide
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Taxotere
5-Fluorouracil
Epirubicin
Cyclophosphamide
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* T2-T3, N0-N1 tumor, non-inflammatory, unilateral, non-metastatic, grade II - III, HER2-neu negative, without extension beyond the breast and axillar area.
* Performance Status = 0-1 WHO.
* Patient non pretreated for breast cancer.
* Patient without cardiac pathology and without anthracyclines contra-indication (assessed by normal ejection fraction).
* Normal haematological, renal and hepatic functions : PNN \> 2.109 /l, platelets \> 100. 109 /l, Hb \> 10 g/dl, normal bilirubin serum , ASAT and ALAT \< 2,5 ULN, alkaline phosphatases \< 2,5 ULN, creatinin \< 140 µmol/l or creatinin clearance \> 60 ml/min
* Written informed consent dated and signed by the patient
* Patient presenting with plurifocal tumors, multicentric tumor, bilateral tumor.
* Grade I well differentiated tumor.
* HER2 neu 3 + (ICH or FISH or CISH) tumor.
* Non measurable lesion, in the two diameters, whatever radiological methods used.
* Patient presenting microcalcifications for which breast conservation is not possible.
* Patient already operated for breast cancer or having had primary axillar node dissection.
* Patient having antecedent of other cancer, exception for in situ uterine cervix or basocellular skin cancer, considered as healed.
* Patient presenting another pathology considered as incompatible with patient inclusion in the study
* Patient should not receive treatment with any other investigational drug and should not participate to another clinical study in a delay \< 30 days or should not be pre-treated by cytostatic chemotherapy.
* Antecedents of allergy to polysorbate 80.
* Patient who is pregnant or lactating and not using effective contraceptive method.
* Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition that may potentially hamper compliance with the study protocol and follow up schedule, assessed with the patient prior to registration in the trial
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Jean Perrin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe Chollet, Pr
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Centre Jean Perrin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital center
Brive-la-Gaillarde, , France
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
University Hospital La Tronche
Grenoble, , France
Edouard Herriot University Hospital
Lyon, , France
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims, , France
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Roché H, Fumoleau P, Spielman M et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88(suppl1):S16. Abstract 27
Mouret-Reynier MA, Abrial CJ, Ferriere JP, Amat S, Cure HD, Kwiatkowski FG, Feillel VA, Lebouedec G, Penault-Llorca FM, Chollet PJ. Neoadjuvant FEC 100 for operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at Centre Jean Perrin. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004 Oct;5(4):303-7. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2004.n.035.
Wang-Lopez Q, Mouret-Reynier MA, Savoye AM, Abrial C, Kwiatkowski F, Garbar C, DuBray-Longeras P, Eymard JC, Lebouedec G, Vanpraagh I, Penault-Llorca F, Chollet P, Cure H. Is it important to adapt neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the visible clinical response? An open randomized phase II study comparing response-guided and standard treatments in HER2-negative operable breast cancer. Oncologist. 2015 Mar;20(3):243-4. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0400. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CJP AU651/Afssaps060744
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.