Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Genomic Driven Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01180335

Last Updated: 2012-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

303 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized trial is comparing a standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a genomic driven chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After a core biopsy, each tumor is profiled using Affymetrix U133plus2 gene expression array. DLD30 score (Hess, JCO, 2006) and TOP2A expression are quantified. Patients are then either treated with 4FEC followed by 4 docetaxel (standard arm) or by a genomic-driven regimen (experiemental arm). In the experimental arm, patients with high DLD30 receive 3 months weekly paclitaxel followed by 4 FEC, patients with high TOP2A receive 4FEC then 4 docetaxel, patients with low DLD30 and low TOP2A are treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel-capecitabine.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chemotherapy

4 cycles FEC followed by 4 cycles docetaxel

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

4 cycles FEC followed by 4 cycles docetaxel

Genomic driven chemotherapy

High DLD30 receive 3 months weekly paclitaxel followed by 4 FEC, patients with high TOP2A receive 4FEC then 4 docetaxel, patients with low DLD30 and low TOP2A are treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel-capecitabine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Genomic driven chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

High DLD30 receive 3 months weekly paclitaxel followed by 4 FEC, patients with high TOP2A receive 4FEC then 4 docetaxel, patients with low DLD30 and low TOP2A are treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel-capecitabine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chemotherapy

4 cycles FEC followed by 4 cycles docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Genomic driven chemotherapy

High DLD30 receive 3 months weekly paclitaxel followed by 4 FEC, patients with high TOP2A receive 4FEC then 4 docetaxel, patients with low DLD30 and low TOP2A are treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel-capecitabine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Invasive breast cancer not eligible for conservative surgery
* Her2 negative
* Amount of tumor cells \>30% on HES slides
* RIN\>6 and amount of RNA\>1 ug
* No metastases
* Subject, age \> 18 years and \<65 years old
* Signed written informed consent
* PS 0-1
* No previous treatment for breast cancer
* Adequate organ function
* FEVG \>50%

Exclusion Criteria

* In situ carcinoma
* Multifocal cancers
* Her2+
* Presence of metastasis
* Genomic testing not feasible because of tumor cells \<30%, RIN\<6, insufficient amount of RNA
* Organ dysfunction that contraindicates chemotherapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Curie

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

G.I.E. REMAGUS

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Florence LEREBOURS, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre René Huguenin

Jean-Yves PIERGA, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Curie

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSET1376

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

'ADVANCE' (A Pilot Trial)
NCT03858322 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1