Efficacy and Safety of Dose-dense Chemotherapy (ddEC-ddP) for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of HER2-negative Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04576143
Last Updated: 2021-08-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2/PHASE3
260 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-20
2027-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minus Anthracycline or Short-Term Versus Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Regimen for Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy
NCT01314833
Neoadjuvant Dose-dense Chemotherapy for HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Patients With High Proliferation Index
NCT05728268
Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant DC-T in Breast Cancer Patients
NCT03123770
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacies in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer
NCT02613026
ACHP-THP vs EC-THP as Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive EBC
NCT04172259
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the recommendation of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, patients with inoperable breast cancer, such as inflammatory breast cancer, N3 nodal disease and T4 tumors are candidates for preoperative systemic therapy. As for those operable patients with HER2-positive disease and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), if T ≥2 or N ≥1, or large primary tumor relative to breast size in a patient who desires breast conservation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also preferred. Based on the results of NSABP-27 and Aberdeen clinical trials, chemotherapeutic drugs including taxanes (such as docetaxel, paclitaxel) and anthracyclines (such as doxorubicin, epirubicin) have become the standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early operable patients and for HER2-negative breast cancer patients, anthracyclines combined with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel is mostly common used.
Limited to myelosuppression and bone marrow repair, conventional chemotherapy cycle is usually set once every 3-4 weeks. Recent years, the application of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), which can shorten the recovery time of leukocytes, enables dose-dense chemotherapy (maximum tolerable dose, every 2 weeks as a cycle) to become a treatment option for high-risk patients. The concept of dose-dense chemotherapy is based on a mathematical model developed by Norton and Simon, and relies on an understanding of Gompertzian model of tumor growth. Gompertzian kinetics explain that human neoplasms do not grow in an exponential fashion, instead the cell-doubling time becomes progressively longer as the tumor growth. Thus, cancer treatments that reduce the size of a tumor can promote faster tumor regrowth between treatments indirectly. So Norton-Simon hypothesis suggests that the most effective strategy is to expose the tumor to cytotoxic agents as frequently as possible to minimize regrowth between cycles.
The CALGB 9471 used a randomized, 2×2 factorial design to prospectively compare sequential doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide with concurrent doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, and to compare dose-dense schedules with conventional schedules. A total of 2005 node-positive, previously untreated patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 36 months, dose-dense treatment significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with conventionally scheduled treatment. The GIM2 study also demonstrated that dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy (FEC-P and EC-P every 2 weeks a cycle) improved DFS and OS compared with standard interval chemotherapy (every 3 weeks a cycle). However, the studies on dose-dense chemotherapy is mostly based on postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. We aim to conduct a prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy (dd epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by dd paclitaxel (P)) and conventional chemotherapy (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by docetaxel (T)) as preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer in Chinese population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
epirubicin/CTX × 4 - docetaxel × 4, every 3 weeks a cycle
Cycle 1-4: Epirubicin i.v. 90 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide i.v. 600 mg/m2 (One cycle = 21 days); Cycle 5-8: Docetaxel i.v. 100mg/m2 (One cycle = 21 days) .
Epirubicin
i.v. 90 mg/m2
Cyclophosphamid
i.v. 600 mg/m2
Docetaxel
i.v. 100 mg/m2
epirubicin/CTX × 4 - paclitaxel × 4, every 2 weeks a cycle
Cycle 1-4: Epirubicin i.v. 90 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide i.v. 600 mg/m2 (One cycle = 14 days); Cycle 5-8:Paclitaxel i.v. 175mg/m2 (One cycle = 14 days) .
Epirubicin
i.v. 90 mg/m2
Cyclophosphamid
i.v. 600 mg/m2
Paclitaxel
i.v. 175 mg/m2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epirubicin
i.v. 90 mg/m2
Cyclophosphamid
i.v. 600 mg/m2
Docetaxel
i.v. 100 mg/m2
Paclitaxel
i.v. 175 mg/m2
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Histological confirmed with unilateral invasive carcinoma (all pathological types are applicable), clinical stage IIA-IIIA;
3. Definite reports on ER/PR/HER2 receptor showing all HER2 negative (HER2 is 0\~1+ or 2+ but determined negative via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or chemiluminescent in situ hybridization (CISH) detected (no amplification) is defined as HER2 negative);
4. According to RECIST 1.1, there is at least one measurable objective focus, tumor size \> 2cm;
5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score is 0 or 1;
6. Cardiac function: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≥55%;
7. Normal bone marrow function: White blood cell count \> 4 × 10\^9/l, neutrophil count \> 1.5 × 10\^9/l, platelet count \> 100 × 10\^9/l and hemoglobin 9g/dl;
8. Normal liver and renal function: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and ALT ≤2.5 folds of the upper limit of normal values, total bilirubin ≤1.5 folds of the upper limit of normal values; Serum creatinine ≤1.5 folds of the upper limit of normal value.
9. Informed consent form signed.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Metastasis at any location;
3. Previous neoadjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy;
4. Severe systemic disease and/or uncontrollable infection, unable to be enrolled in this study;
5. Known allergic or intolerable to chemotherapeutic agents;
6. Previously suffering from malignant tumors within 5 years (except for basal cell carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ), including contralateral breast cancer;
7. Cardiovascular disease: LVEF \<50% (echocardiography) of New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ grade 2;
8. Pregnant and breast-feeding women; Pregnancy test showed positive results before drug administration after enrolling in to the study; Women at childbearing age refuse to take contraception measures during the treatment and 8 weeks after completion of treatment;
9. Already enrolled into other clinical trials;
10. The researchers judged the patients who were not suitable for this study.
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University
OTHER
Changxing People's Hospital
OTHER
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Universiry
UNKNOWN
Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital
OTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yiding Chen
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;(30):96-102. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003469.
Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, Hoehn JL, Vogel VG, Dakhil SR, Tamkus D, King KM, Pajon ER, Wright MJ, Robert J, Paik S, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 10;26(5):778-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0235.
Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, Smith R, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, Margolese R, Theoret H, Soran A, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 15;21(22):4165-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.005. Epub 2003 Oct 14.
Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, Sarkar TK, Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, Smith I, Walker LG, Eremin O; Aberdeen Breast Group. Neoadjuvant docetaxel in breast cancer: 3-year survival results from the Aberdeen trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002 Oct;3 Suppl 2:S69-74. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2002.s.015.
Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081. Epub 2003 Feb 13.
Del Mastro L, De Placido S, Bruzzi P, De Laurentiis M, Boni C, Cavazzini G, Durando A, Turletti A, Nistico C, Valle E, Garrone O, Puglisi F, Montemurro F, Barni S, Ardizzoni A, Gamucci T, Colantuoni G, Giuliano M, Gravina A, Papaldo P, Bighin C, Bisagni G, Forestieri V, Cognetti F; Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) investigators. Fluorouracil and dose-dense chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer: an open-label, 2 x 2 factorial, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1863-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62048-1. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
Earl HM, Hiller L, Dunn JA, Blenkinsop C, Grybowicz L, Vallier AL, Gounaris I, Abraham JE, Hughes-Davies L, McAdam K, Chan S, Ahmad R, Hickish T, Rea D, Caldas C, Bartlett JMS, Cameron DA, Provenzano E, Thomas J, Hayward RL; ARTemis Investigators Group. Disease-free and overall survival at 3.5 years for neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2 negative early breast cancer: ARTemis Trial. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1817-1824. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx173.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-495
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.