High Dose Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Therapy in Treating Women With Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00003032

Last Updated: 2020-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

224 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1997-04-25

Study Completion Date

2008-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard therapy is more effective than high dose chemotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with that of standard therapy in treating women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer that has responded to previous chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the overall survival of women with metastatic breast cancer receiving either high dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell therapy or standard therapy following response to anthracycline or taxane based chemotherapy. II. Evaluate the final response rates between the two treatment arms. III. Compare the two treatment arms with respect to toxic effects. IV. Assess health related quality of life in both groups of patients.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, nonblinded, randomized study. Patients are stratified by type of induction chemotherapy, response status, presence of visceral disease, receptor status and tamoxifen therapy (ER negative; ER positive, no prior tamoxifen; ER positive, failed tamoxifen; receptor status unknown). A quality of life questionnaire is given to each patient before and during treatment, then every 3 months thereafter. Patients are assessed following 4 courses of induction chemotherapy. Those achieving complete remission, partial remission, or who have no evaluable disease are randomized to either treatment arm I or arm II. For treatment arm I, stem cells are mobilized by chemotherapy (courses 5 and 6) plus filgrastim (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone. Following course 6, patients receive daily doses of IV cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and carboplatin on days -6 to -3, followed by stem cell infusion on day 0 and G-CSF from day 5. In arm II, patients receive two further courses of standard induction chemotherapy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating physician. All patients with positive receptor status or unknown receptor status who have not previously failed tamoxifen therapy, receive tamoxifen at the completion of post peripheral stem cell transplant (arm I) or induction chemotherapy (arm II). Following hematologic recovery from high dose chemotherapy patients in arm I with limited disease receive consolidated radiation and may also receive surgical treatment for limited disease. In arm II, patients who completed courses 5 and 6 of induction chemotherapy receive involved field radiation at the physician's discretion. Patients from arm II may also receive surgical treatment following protocol therapy at the physician's discretion. Patients are followed every 3 months until death.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: This study will accrue approximately 50 patients per year for a total of 192 patients in 3.8 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

filgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

tamoxifen citrate

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically or cytologically confirmed breast cancer Metastatic disease and/or axillary node or chest wall recurrence following mastectomy diagnosed at least 3 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy Radiologic scans required No inflammatory carcinoma of the breast without metastases (i.e. T4d M0) No previously untreated inflammatory carcinoma of the breast (T4d) No recurrent breast cancer diagnosed less than 3 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy No history or evidence of CNS (brain or leptomeningeal) metastases Hormone receptor status: Not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 16 to 60 Sex: Female Performance status: ECOG 0-2 Menopausal status: Not specified Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Hemoglobin at least 100 g/L Granulocyte count at least 1500/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: AST and/or ALT no greater than 3 times upper limit of normal OR AST and/or ALT no greater than 5 times upper limit of normal, if liver metastases Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal Renal: Serum creatinine no greater than 2 times upper limit of normal Cardiovascular: No history of congestive heart failure OR At least 1 year since prior myocardial infarction LVEF at least 45% or normal (ECHO or MUGA are acceptable) Other: No prior or concurrent malignancies allowed, except adequately treated squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or cancer treated more than 5 years ago and presumed cured Not HIV positive No clinical evidence of AIDS Not pregnant or nursing Effective contraception required of fertile patients No major medical illness precluding safe administration of planned treatment or required follow-up

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No concurrent biologic response modifier therapy Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer Induction chemotherapy required Endocrine therapy: Prior hormonal therapy allowed No concurrent hormonal therapy Radiotherapy: Concurrent radiotherapy allowed for pain control or to solitary bone or soft tissue sites Surgery: Prior oophorectomy allowed See Disease Characteristics
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NCIC Clinical Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael R. Crump, MD, FRCPC

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tom Baker Cancer Center - Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

BC Cancer Agency

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

CancerCare Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Moncton Hospital

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Saint John Regional Hospital

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Nova Scotia Cancer Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

William Osler Health Centre

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Northeastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Sudbury

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Cancer Care Ontario-Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Cancer Care Ontario-London Regional Cancer Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hotel Dieu Hospital - St. Catharines

St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Northwestern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Thunder Bay

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Humber River Regional Hospital

Weston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Cancer Care Ontario - Windsor Regional Cancer Centre

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, PEI

Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada

Site Status

L'Hotel Dieu de Levis

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Department of Oncology

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hotel Dieu de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, Pavillion de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Crump M, Gluck S, Tu D, Stewart D, Levine M, Kirkbride P, Dancey J, O'Reilly S, Shore T, Couban S, Girouard C, Marlin S, Shepherd L, Pritchard KI. Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer: NCIC MA.16. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8851. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18025439 (View on PubMed)

Dancey J, Crump M, Gluck S, et al.: Quality of life (QOL) analysis of a randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with peripheral stem cell transplant (PSCT) versus standard chemotherapy (SCT) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study (NCIC CTG) MA-16 . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-3010, 749, 2003.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAN-NCIC-MA16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000065634

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MA16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.