High Dose Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Therapy in Treating Women With Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00003032
Last Updated: 2020-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
224 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1997-04-25
2008-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with that of standard therapy in treating women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer that has responded to previous chemotherapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standard Chemotherapy Compared With High-Dose Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Women With Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer
NCT00003680
Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in Treating Women With Stage IV Breast Cancer
NCT00012311
Combination Chemotherapy and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage IIIA Breast Cancer
NCT00003972
Combination Chemotherapy, Amifostine, and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Breast Cancer
NCT00003927
Combination Chemotherapy and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00004906
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, nonblinded, randomized study. Patients are stratified by type of induction chemotherapy, response status, presence of visceral disease, receptor status and tamoxifen therapy (ER negative; ER positive, no prior tamoxifen; ER positive, failed tamoxifen; receptor status unknown). A quality of life questionnaire is given to each patient before and during treatment, then every 3 months thereafter. Patients are assessed following 4 courses of induction chemotherapy. Those achieving complete remission, partial remission, or who have no evaluable disease are randomized to either treatment arm I or arm II. For treatment arm I, stem cells are mobilized by chemotherapy (courses 5 and 6) plus filgrastim (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone. Following course 6, patients receive daily doses of IV cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and carboplatin on days -6 to -3, followed by stem cell infusion on day 0 and G-CSF from day 5. In arm II, patients receive two further courses of standard induction chemotherapy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating physician. All patients with positive receptor status or unknown receptor status who have not previously failed tamoxifen therapy, receive tamoxifen at the completion of post peripheral stem cell transplant (arm I) or induction chemotherapy (arm II). Following hematologic recovery from high dose chemotherapy patients in arm I with limited disease receive consolidated radiation and may also receive surgical treatment for limited disease. In arm II, patients who completed courses 5 and 6 of induction chemotherapy receive involved field radiation at the physician's discretion. Patients from arm II may also receive surgical treatment following protocol therapy at the physician's discretion. Patients are followed every 3 months until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: This study will accrue approximately 50 patients per year for a total of 192 patients in 3.8 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
filgrastim
cisplatin
cyclophosphamide
mitoxantrone hydrochloride
tamoxifen citrate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 16 to 60 Sex: Female Performance status: ECOG 0-2 Menopausal status: Not specified Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Hemoglobin at least 100 g/L Granulocyte count at least 1500/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: AST and/or ALT no greater than 3 times upper limit of normal OR AST and/or ALT no greater than 5 times upper limit of normal, if liver metastases Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal Renal: Serum creatinine no greater than 2 times upper limit of normal Cardiovascular: No history of congestive heart failure OR At least 1 year since prior myocardial infarction LVEF at least 45% or normal (ECHO or MUGA are acceptable) Other: No prior or concurrent malignancies allowed, except adequately treated squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or cancer treated more than 5 years ago and presumed cured Not HIV positive No clinical evidence of AIDS Not pregnant or nursing Effective contraception required of fertile patients No major medical illness precluding safe administration of planned treatment or required follow-up
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No concurrent biologic response modifier therapy Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer Induction chemotherapy required Endocrine therapy: Prior hormonal therapy allowed No concurrent hormonal therapy Radiotherapy: Concurrent radiotherapy allowed for pain control or to solitary bone or soft tissue sites Surgery: Prior oophorectomy allowed See Disease Characteristics
16 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael R. Crump, MD, FRCPC
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tom Baker Cancer Center - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Moncton Hospital
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
William Osler Health Centre
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Northeastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Sudbury
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Cancer Care Ontario-Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Cancer Care Ontario-London Regional Cancer Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Hotel Dieu Hospital - St. Catharines
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Northwestern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Thunder Bay
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Humber River Regional Hospital
Weston, Ontario, Canada
Cancer Care Ontario - Windsor Regional Cancer Centre
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, PEI
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
L'Hotel Dieu de Levis
Lévis, Quebec, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
McGill University Department of Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Hotel Dieu de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, Pavillion de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Crump M, Gluck S, Tu D, Stewart D, Levine M, Kirkbride P, Dancey J, O'Reilly S, Shore T, Couban S, Girouard C, Marlin S, Shepherd L, Pritchard KI. Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer: NCIC MA.16. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8851. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
Dancey J, Crump M, Gluck S, et al.: Quality of life (QOL) analysis of a randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with peripheral stem cell transplant (PSCT) versus standard chemotherapy (SCT) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study (NCIC CTG) MA-16 . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-3010, 749, 2003.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAN-NCIC-MA16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000065634
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MA16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.