A Randomized Controlled Trial on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children With Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

NCT ID: NCT00382343

Last Updated: 2015-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1999-11-30

Study Completion Date

2007-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing pyelonephritis and in avoiding the appearance of new scars in a sample of children under 36 months with vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In recent years, the effectiveness of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) has been intensely discussed. The question is not only whether antibiotics are effective in preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), but also whether they alter the natural history of disease and help to prevent the appearance of new kidneys scars. The evidence on the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis is scanty: randomised controlled trials (RCT) published until now are poorly designed and carried out in very heterogeneous samples of children, i.e. spanning from 6 months to 14-18 years of age and pooling patients with and without VUR. A recently updated Cochrane Systematic Review concludes that high quality RCTs are needed to determine the effectiveness of long-term antibiotics for the prevention of UTIs in susceptible children. Moreover, the presence of VUR has not been firmly shown to be a risk factor for recurrence of pyelonephritis, and a direct association between VUR and the presence of scars or the appearance of new scars has not been demonstrated; there is just an association between VUR of grade IV-V and prenatal renal dysplasia, almost exclusively in male infants. In spite of this uncertainty, several practice guidelines recommend long term antibiotic prophylaxis in children with different degrees of VUR.

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing pyelonephritis and in avoiding the appearance of new scars in a sample of children under 36 months with VUR.

Comparison: In a multicentre trial, 100 patients with VUR diagnosed with cystourethrography after a first episode of acute pyelonephritis or for prenatal evidence of pyelectasia will be assigned randomly to receive prophylaxis or not. Randomization will be carried out using a centralized minimization procedure to balance for sex, age group and VUR grade.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pyelonephritis Renal Scars

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Antibiotic prophylaxis with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim \[1-2 mg/kg trimethoprim and 5-10 mg/kg sulfamethoxazole once daily\]; in case of intolerance (leucopoenia) and for children younger than 6 months: nitrofurantoin \[2 mg/kg once daily\]

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Intervention Type DRUG

Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim prophylaxis

No prophylaxis

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim prophylaxis

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* presence of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) grade II, III or IV, based on the International Classification, mono or bilateral, diagnosed between one day and 30 months of age after a first episode of acute pyelonephritis, or after birth during diagnostic procedures planned as a consequence of prenatal ultrasonographic evidence of pyelectasia.

Exclusion Criteria

* previous episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI), even if only suspected (e.g. an episode of fever treated with antibiotics without performing urine culture);
* VUR grade I, because of the high probability of rapid spontaneous resolution;
* VUR grade V, as requested by the Technical Scientific Committee, concerned by the high incidence of associated renal dysplasia;
* recurrence of acute pyelonephritis before the first dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan, if this was positive for scars.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ronfani Luca

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marco Pennesi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sant'Orsola Hospital

Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Site Status

Bufalini Hospital

Cesena, Cesena, Italy

Site Status

San Polo Hospital

Monfalcone, Gorizia, Italy

Site Status

Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital

Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy

Site Status

Institute of Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

Trieste, Trieste, Italy

Site Status

San Daniele Hospital

San Daniele, Udine, Italy

Site Status

Sant'Antonio Abate Hospital

Tolmezzo, Udine, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pennesi M, Travan L, Peratoner L, Bordugo A, Cattaneo A, Ronfani L, Minisini S, Ventura A; North East Italy Prophylaxis in VUR study group. Is antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesicoureteral reflux effective in preventing pyelonephritis and renal scars? A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1489-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2652. Epub 2008 May 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18490378 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC 35/00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.