Evaluation of Pain in Urinary Collections in Pediatric Emergencies in Children Who Have Not Acquired Cleanliness

NCT ID: NCT03263845

Last Updated: 2017-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-05

Study Completion Date

2017-01-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Observational study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Febrile urinary infections account for 5% of unexplained causes of fever in children up to 2 years of age. Urinary samples are therefore very common in pediatric emergencies. In children who have not acquired cleanliness, the most used method of collection is the placement of a sterile urine bag on the perineum. It allows a noninvasive urinary collection. However from a bacteriological point of view this method is debatable because the rate of contamination of the collections is important. This mode of collection is of interest only to exclude a urinary infection, by the realization of a urinary strip.

Pocket-collected urine is not reliable for bacteriological analysis in culture. For example, if the urine strip is positive, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends urine sampling by urine sampling (or other invasive methods) for culture.

The urine bag should be changed every 30 minutes to avoid the risk of contamination. The technique is wait-and-see, the installation of several pockets is often necessary before obtaining urine.

A study carried out in 2014 shows that in 39.4% of the cases the withdrawal of the urinary pouch was as much more painful than the urinary sounding, in the same patient. To our knowledge there is no other study dealing with the difference in pain engendered by these two methods.

Since the urinary catheterization is faster, bacteriologically justified and necessary if the pocket collection is positive, it seems legitimate to ask ourselves if we should not aim at a generalization of the urinary catheterization, as first intention, Having not acquired cleanliness, requiring a withdrawal of urine for suspicion of urinary infection.

Many centers continue to use urinary pocket collection mainly, as the survey technique seems too invasive and painful.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Tract Infections in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Children under 3 years of age who have not acquired the cleanliness present at the pediatric emergency department in Rennes, where urine sampling is necessary in case of suspected urinary tract infection.
Maximum Eligible Age

3 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rennes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amelie Rickewaert

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rennes University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rennes University Hospital

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

35RC16_3036_SONDAPU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.