Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery and an Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant for Disseminated Neuroblastoma

NCT ID: NCT00365755

Last Updated: 2013-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Giving combination chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. A bone marrow transplant, using bone marrow from the patient, may be able to replace blood-forming cells that were destroyed by chemotherapy. It is not yet know which combination chemotherapy schedule is more effective, when given before surgery and an autologous bone marrow transplant, in treating patients with disseminated neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different chemotherapy schedules to compare how well they work in treating young patients who are undergoing surgery and an autologous bone marrow transplant for disseminated neuroblastoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the response rates (bone marrow and primary tumor) in young patients with disseminated neuroblastoma treated with two different combination chemotherapy schedules comprising vincristine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, etoposide, and carboplatin followed by surgery and autologous stem cell transplantation.
* Compare the event-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the prognostic factors of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I (OPEC/OJEC): Patients receive OPEC combination chemotherapy comprising vincristine IV, cyclophosphamide IV, cisplatin IV continuously over 24 hours, and etoposide IV over 4 hours on day 1 of course 1. Patients then receive OJEC combination chemotherapy comprising vincristine IV, cyclophosphamide IV, etoposide IV over 4 hours, and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1 of course 2. OPEC and OJEC regimens alternate so that patients receive 4 courses of OPEC and 3 courses of OJEC over 18 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II (Rapid COJEC): Patients receive vincristine IV and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1 and etoposide IV over 4 hours on days 1 and 2 (regimen 1). Ten days later, patients receive vincristine IV followed by cisplatin IV continuously over 24 hours on day 1 (regimen 2). Ten days later, patients receive vincristine IV on day 1 and etoposide IV over 4 hours and cyclophosphamide IV on days 1 and 2 (regimen 3). Treatment continues for 10 weeks (with a 10-day interval between regimens in this order: regimen 2, regimen 1, regimen 2, regimen 3, and regimen 2) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients who achieve bone marrow complete remission then undergo surgery. Patients achieving bone marrow partial remission or less are removed from study.

After surgery, patients receive cyclophosphamide IV on day -7 and undergo bone marrow harvest on day 1. Patients then receive high-dose melphalan IV on day 1. Autologous bone marrow cells are reinfused on day 3.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 190 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuroblastoma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

disseminated neuroblastoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

melphalan

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

autologous bone marrow transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

conventional surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed disseminated neuroblastoma

* No local or regional neuroblastoma
* No disseminated disease that is demonstrated by meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan only
* Needle biopsy of primary tumor required

* Fine needle aspiration is not adequate

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* No prior chemotherapy
* No other prior therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charles Ross Pinkerton, MD

Role:

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Andrew David J. Pearson, MD, FRCP, DCh

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Newcastle Upon-Tyne

Ian J. Lewis, MD

Role:

Leeds Cancer Centre at St. James's University Hospital

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pearson AD, Pinkerton CR, Lewis IJ, Imeson J, Ellershaw C, Machin D; European Neuroblastoma Study Group; Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG formerly United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group). High-dose rapid and standard induction chemotherapy for patients aged over 1 year with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):247-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70069-X.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18308250 (View on PubMed)

Moreno L, Vaidya SJ, Pinkerton CR, Lewis IJ, Imeson J, Machin D, Pearson AD; European Neuroblastoma Study Group; Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG) (formerly UKCCSG). Long-term follow-up of children with high-risk neuroblastoma: the ENSG5 trial experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Jul;60(7):1135-40. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24452. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23281263 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDR0000454576

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-20592

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CCLG-NB-1990-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CCLG-ENSG-5

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id